JustChip
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,138
- Reaction score
- 5,726
The question is not whether there are better coaches out there than Garrett. No one has asserted he's the best HC. And while some have asserted he's the worst, that is incorrect.
Would you rather have Reid, Tomlin or any HC with a good playoff record? Of course you would but that is not the choice. The choice is Garrett or an unknown HC that fits the requirements, should he get canned.
If you are going to compare coaches that could have done better, is it not fair to do the opposite? He's not the worst we could get just like Booger is not the worst GM. When anyone takes the extreme position, it really weakens the argument.
I do not see how anyone can really discuss this subject without considering the circumstances of his employment, They are not two separate issues, they are conjoined.
As Big Tuna says, you are what your record says you are. Jason Garrett is better than same, not as good as some, and relatively the same as some. He has strengths (yes, contrary to the emotional hyperbole espoused by most on here, he does have strengths) and weaknesses, both of which are different than every other coach. That's no different than every other human being.
I think Jason can lead this team to a Super Bowl, but can't guarantee it. By the same token, I don't care who replaces him, I wouldn't be able to guarantee that coach could either. I will say though that Jason's skills may be in building a roster and culture to prepare the team for the next level, but isn't what is needed to take them there. It's similar to an entrepreneurial skillset is right for growing a fledgling business and taking it to a certain level, but that same individual isn't what's needed when the business matures.