Hook'em#11;3130655 said:
Garrett has a lot of good plays.
When executed correctly. They work. Who would of thought?
I did like that play though, very nice, crisp. Upon seeing that play again, I can't believe how this team lost that damn game. LOL.
OK, it was a good play, so what? One good play among a littany of many other bad plays does not cut it for me, sorry!
For a team that has done a pizz-poor job executing in the red-zone all season, this one play hardly absolves the coordinator. In fact it helps support the argumnet that poor red-zone execution is not necessarily the players' faults.
This play was well executed because it was well designed - set up well by the coordinator - finally. For once the coordinator did the baiing, unlike the hundreds of other failed red-zone plays that the coordinaor gets baited into by defenses, thus, not allowing player execution to have a fair chance of happening.
What this one play does is prove that continued offensive success falls on Garrett before the players. These players have battled injury all season and have still stepped up. Now it's up to the coordinator to not onl step up but stay up. So far he has not proven that he can. At least now he has the chance to do it and PROVE his contractual worth.