mattjames2010
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,835
- Reaction score
- 20,691
Why did the NFLPA run to Minnesota court for the Brady case, if not Judge cherry picking, they picked the judge that hates the NFL, well known and why they run there.. Brady doesn't live or play there, the NFL offices aren't there, are you clueless to what the NFLPA does!
The NFL gave a statement overview of the case decision ,
I can suspend an employee for company code of conduct, walmart can and so can the NFL
Again, I am not interested in the silly arguments of biased courts/judges. I just don't care, and honestly, it's completely irrelevant where they take it. At the end of the day, the NFL has to have reasonable rulings or they can have their ***** handed to them. Yet again, this isn't like having a job at Walmart. There contracts, there are protections that players have along as rights - which, once again, why they are able to appeal and why NFL suspensions are often reduced or removed. Is that enough now, can we stop with these circles?
Everything in the NFL statement was laid out - they do not have enough evidence to 100% say Zeke abused her. It's simple as that, did you read the entire statement or no? They can suspend Zeke, no one is denying that. But again, their decision must be reasonable and have sufficient evidence to suspend a player. Why are you even arguing this? Whether they go to Minny or New York for better leverage, it doesn't matter - players can still appeal and the NFL must show they had reason to suspend.