playmakers
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,238
- Reaction score
- 154
Back in the 50's, 60's 70' and even 80's players were much smaller and slower. There's always an exception but for the most part as a whole they were. Today you have guys like DeMarcus who is 6' 4, 260 pounds and can still run a 4.7. In most of the eras I just mention, Ware would of probably been a defensive tackle or offensive lineman. Ware is just one of many that size in the NFL now. This leads me to my question and that is should the NFL widen the fields by a yard of two? I'll make my case for it.
It wont be long before every player on the field is the same speed. Back in the 60s, if you would of said multiple players of today were 6'4 235 and runs a 4.5 or a 6 3 330 pound man can run a 4.8 on the dline, they would of probably laughed. Wide recievers and defensive backs can not get any faster imo. However, lineman most certainly can. In addition, the 6 foot four inch lineman (roughly average height of the starters) are now going to be the 6 foot 7 inch lineman. Will there be any room out there to move?
Another thing to consider with this is the advantage players of yesterday had in comparison of today. Take Jim Brown for example. Im going to guess and say his oline averaged say 6 feet 250 pounds and at the same time going to guess the average defensive lineman he played against were about the same. In todays game the avearge is probably 6 4 320 for an olineman and 6 2 290 for a dline(the dends really kill the averages). Lets do some comparing. A 6 feet 250 pound lineman gets you sent to D2. How would Jim Brown do against the pounding of a bigger player week in and week out. Anyways, Im not here to compare that but I will say you do the math. Another example is speed. Jim Brown was probably a 4.7 guy back then. 4.7 is a linebacker today and not only that, 65 percent of the playing field has a 4.7 or faster player on it. Back in the 60's-70's I say most players were 5.0 or more. Again, do the math.
If you have a field full of players bigger,faster, stronger but still play on the same size field as players who were considerably slower and smaller whose at a disadvantage? Today's players are. Adrian Peterson would put up 2700 yards a season back in the 60's-70's simply because theres more room out there for him to maneveur with. Pretty soon with the size of players every play is just going to be one big pile up in the middle. I say widen the field by one yard on each side (due to the expansion of size and speed) and give the players some wiggle room out there to do their thing. Anyone in favor? Eventually, this should come in question at an owners meeting. opinions
It wont be long before every player on the field is the same speed. Back in the 60s, if you would of said multiple players of today were 6'4 235 and runs a 4.5 or a 6 3 330 pound man can run a 4.8 on the dline, they would of probably laughed. Wide recievers and defensive backs can not get any faster imo. However, lineman most certainly can. In addition, the 6 foot four inch lineman (roughly average height of the starters) are now going to be the 6 foot 7 inch lineman. Will there be any room out there to move?
Another thing to consider with this is the advantage players of yesterday had in comparison of today. Take Jim Brown for example. Im going to guess and say his oline averaged say 6 feet 250 pounds and at the same time going to guess the average defensive lineman he played against were about the same. In todays game the avearge is probably 6 4 320 for an olineman and 6 2 290 for a dline(the dends really kill the averages). Lets do some comparing. A 6 feet 250 pound lineman gets you sent to D2. How would Jim Brown do against the pounding of a bigger player week in and week out. Anyways, Im not here to compare that but I will say you do the math. Another example is speed. Jim Brown was probably a 4.7 guy back then. 4.7 is a linebacker today and not only that, 65 percent of the playing field has a 4.7 or faster player on it. Back in the 60's-70's I say most players were 5.0 or more. Again, do the math.
If you have a field full of players bigger,faster, stronger but still play on the same size field as players who were considerably slower and smaller whose at a disadvantage? Today's players are. Adrian Peterson would put up 2700 yards a season back in the 60's-70's simply because theres more room out there for him to maneveur with. Pretty soon with the size of players every play is just going to be one big pile up in the middle. I say widen the field by one yard on each side (due to the expansion of size and speed) and give the players some wiggle room out there to do their thing. Anyone in favor? Eventually, this should come in question at an owners meeting. opinions
:
