Orton didn't want to retire?

[Nightman]

Playing cards with Kenny Rogers can be boring to a rook as well...and if you don't like style, ignore content and move on, bud...this isn't a popularity contest around here.

As to content, this is full of attitude...so?

Build a stance upon first and third person, don't just use second person and leave a dump...that only takes a five gallon can of diesel and a shovel to get rid of. Oh yea, you never made it to Viet Nam or stayed around camp enough to do anything but on the block antics. Just go figure..

You make zero sense, I will take you up on the ignore part.

 

[CCBoy]

You make zero sense, I will take you up on the ignore part.

There are two you's and no content...no contribution...zero, zilch, and instead of wishing to conduct a parade with cliché. Two points higher in IQ and that qualifies for a status of sedimentary rock...by all means, move on, instead of dumping as you repeat.

Maybe one can work the bravery up to comment on topic...instead of hiding behind other's word on subject.

By the way, bother to read the top posting by Reality...who has paid his dues in the early star wars on the net, unlike what this shows.

 

[TheDude]

I love Moe. He's my favorite Stooge.

Moe Hill is the lost stooge..you may be thinking of Moe Howard.

I'm off to bed need to profit for additional funds tomorrow

 

[CCBoy]

English lesson 101:

First person is used to denote directions and thoughts form the person forming a sentence.

Third person is used in a sentence to formulate or describe a working relationship that is being shown by the person. It is the element used for an educational or perspective addition.

Second person, you, is generally used to denote an insult, attack of a person, or confrontation in style. It is anatagonistic in nature...it should be used in a discretionary basis only. Never for the continual meat of anyone's observations...period.

 

[TheDude]

There are two you's and no content...no contribution...zero, zilch, and instead of wishing to conduct a parade with cliché. Two points higher in IQ and that qualifies for a status of sedimentary rock...by all means, move on, instead of dumping as you repeat.

Maybe one can work the bravery up to comment on topic...instead of hiding behind other's word on subject.

By the way, bother to read the top posting by Reality...who has paid his dues in the early star wars on the net, unlike what this shows.

What is your aversion to the second person pronoun "you?"

Do you like to be referred to as the "one who stands to my opposite when in person?" Or the "one who scribes second order metaphors based on his personal selective experience?"

 

[TheDude]

English lesson 101:

First person is used to denote directions and thoughts form the person forming a sentence.

Third person is used in a sentence to formulate or describe a working relationship that is being shown by the person. It is the element used for an educational or perspective addition.

Second person, you, is generally used to denote an insult, attack of a person, or confrontation in style. It is anatagonistic in nature...it should be used in a discretionary basis only. Never for the continual meat of anyone's observations...period.

Never mind previous posts.

Sounds like you are intentionally looking for a fight. You is a totally appropriate pronoun. Are you hungry, how was your day? You look pretty?

Not that I want to get into a philosophical discussion, but I is a much more inflammatory pronoun stated or implied

 

[CCBoy]

What is your aversion to the second person pronoun "you?"

Do you like to be referred to as the "one who stands to my opposite when in person?" Or the "one who scribes second order metaphors based on his personal selective experience?"

Naw, and the answer is obvious. I like to hear more direct comments about the game, and not sing along crap tossings. Understand...and implied second person still works for a dysfunctional brain bias.

You were just screwing around, above, and not even attempting a topical approach that does work in 3rd and 1st person...but as to your blatant and intended insult of topic...grow up!

But a real expression of today's youth and who believe they know all before experiencing it all...and that involves correct communications, not turd tossing. Implied works just fine, but touches other aspects that aren't insulted if honest in observing.

NTIG..(oh, figure that one out, dullie)

 

[TheDude]

Naw, and the answer is obvious. I like to hear more direct comments about the game, and not sing along crap tossings. Understand...and implied second person still works for a dysfunctional brain bias.

You were just screwing around, above, and not even attempting a topical approach that does work in 3rd and 1st person...but as to your blatant and intended insult of topic...grow up!

But a real expression of today's youth and who believe they know all before experiencing it all...and that involves correct communications, not turd tossing. Implied works just fine, but touches other aspects that aren't insulted if honest in observing.

NTIG..(oh, figure that one out, dullie)

Definition of sad curmudgeon ^^^^

Yesteryear is over...you would get more respect if you showed it.

I won't engage you anymore. I feel guilty.

Dullie out

 

[CCBoy]

Never mind previous posts.

Sounds like you are intentionally looking for a fight. You is a totally appropriate pronoun. Are you hungry, how was your day? You look pretty?

Not that I want to get into a philosophical discussion, but I is a much more inflammatory pronoun stated or implied

You stated first: you are intentionally looking for a fight. The reason for an approach in sentence structure was presented and explained. You really that biased?

You is totally appropriate pronoun. If used constructively, but continually passed off is about as appropriate an expression as **** head.

Are YOU hungry...building on insult alone.

How was Your day? Not applying the start of what was a discussion on merit along topic, before personalith, instead of discussion in sentence structuring. Oh yea, a return to you again was used, instead of putting into perspective of a style excuse instead of reasoning on subject.

That, if disagreed with, is alright, but to insult, and continue in a insultive vein and intended insultive vein is something else. That all is upon a concept. You are singled out only if you feel intimidated.

Don't want to be singled out for a continual demeaning style, don't use it or insult another for using a completely proper non use of inflammatory initiated distractions.

Don't like MY comments, the YOU can ignore or continue to butt heads on non - issues that are twisted into insult, instead.

I'm not sorry that I grew up when Sir was the first word out of a youth's mouth and where time was spent in discussing elements and why something was proper, and acceptable to stand up for...and simple sentence structure still formats into a paragraph. Even if in two or three sentences...they are supposed to be contributory, that statements with elements of tar and feathers behind them.

Place me on ignore as well, but if one takes your approach, it will be confronted in a similar manner. Or, one could just be polite, on topic, and stay away from band wagon insults.

My posts become informationally directed and news imputs other wise. But take your own medicine..

 

[CCBoy]

Definition of sad curmudgeon ^^^^

Yesteryear is over...you would get more respect if you showed it.

I won't engage you anymore. I feel guilty.

Dullie out

Yea, and a bear doesn't dump in the wild...dullie, for informational purpose, is the affectionate term for a first year Cadet at the Air Force Academy...but irony here is still in the second person. And in someone already possessing an earned degree, function isn't at the core of issue here...perhaps less trips to arrogance wouldn't be objected to, AROUND HERE

 

[CCBoy]

This is discussion...McLovin, you saying Orton is sainted or a dude taking excesses with the system?

 

[TheDude]

Yea, and a bear doesn't dump in the wild...dullie, for informational purpose, is the affectionate term for a first year Cadet at the Air Force Academy...but irony here is still in the second person. And in someone already possessing an earned degree, function isn't at the core of issue here...perhaps less trips to arrogance wouldn't be objected to, AROUND HERE

Yeah well in the 21st century dullie is short for dullard and stupid...the onus is not on me t google every obscure military centric reference to derive your intent. This a social norm and modicum of respect. I wouldnt engage you on obscure musical ref such as "The locrian mode is strong with this one".

This is a football board not the sentence diagramming of Tolstoy's work on the Russian revolution re-drafted for 1950s Korean war jargon.

I don't put people on ignore - its an extremely cowardly move -imo. Nothing anyone writes on the internet is going to affect my day.

 

[Nightman]

Yeah well in the 21st century dullie is short for dullard and stupid...the onus is not on me t google every obscure military centric reference to derive your intent. This a social norm and modicum of respect. I wouldnt engage you on obscure musical ref such as "The locrian mode is strong with this one".

This is a football board not the sentence diagramming of Tolstoy's work on the Russian revolution re-drafted for 1950s Korean war jargon.

I don't put people on ignore - its an extremely cowardly move -imo. Nothing anyone writes on the internet is going to affect my day.

At least I'm not the only one. Dude is off his rocker.

 

[CCBoy]

Take out the misspellings, time elapsed removed that additional editing ability, and the reading is a lot smoother as to continuity with points and directions. That doesn't go to sanity issues, although...just typing skills.