Our Defense:

[ScipioCowboy]

see, you didn't listen due to your stubborness. Pierce was just 1 example of what they were missing.

front sevens are the d-line and linebackers

you said the giants strength was there d-line. they were missing there entire starting lb core.

our strength is our linebackers. i said now imagine our entire starting d-line missing.

It's clear to me that you can't even remember your own words:

you said the giants strength on defense is there d-line correct? i said they didn't have 1 starting linebacker playing. so since the linebackers are our strength i said imagine if our d-line was backups like the giants linebackers were. understand?

And...

trust me man. I live in Ny and see every giants game. Pierce is an average linebacker but he gets everybody lined up correctly and does his homework. imagine our defense missing all our starting d-linemen?

And...

the Giants didn't have 1 of there starting linebackers playing tonight and atleast 1 of there starting corners.

if you still don't understand than you're just not very smart.

Point of advice: You probably shouldn't be lecturing anyone on the merits of his intelligence when you're unable to keep your own arguments straight over a 10 minute span.

 

[Rampage]

It's clear to me that you can't even remember your own words:



And...



And...



Point of advice: You probably shouldn't be lecturing anyone on the merits of his intelligence when you're unable to keep your own arguments straight over a 10 minute span.

wow you seem about as smart as this kid tonight.

my arguement has been the same the whole time. read slower wiggum jr.

 

[jazzcat22]

I don't like what I'm seeing. Ware (I know, I know) has been invisible the whole preseason, our STARTING secondary is still beyond porous. We make NO plays, and yield stupid penalties like we're giving away Halloween candy. Our depth on DLine shows no ability to stop the run consistently. We do not account for backs out of the backfield. We might be the worst tackling team in the NFL. WTH is going on Wade?

They aren't game plannibg, and no way will they show any of their blitzes in pre season....chill out....it will be fine.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

wow you seem about as smart as this kid tonight.


my arguement has been the same the whole time. read slower wiggum jr.

You can read as slowly as you like. It won't change the words you initially typed.

Based on our exchange here, I've surmised that you struggle with basic reading comprehension. In order to remedy that, I suggest you go here.

I've heard that they work wonders!

 

[Rampage]

You can read as slowly as you like. It won't change the words you initially typed.

Based on our exchange here, I've surmised that you struggle with basic reading comprehension. In order to remedy that, I suggest you go here.

I've heard that they work wonders!

where did i change my arguement?

 

[windward]

no and it's not crap either. they have a solid o-line and running game. Sanchez also is looking good right now for a rookie qb. but than again you're only impressed by the cowboys every year so.....

I dunno, I seem to remember David trashing the Cowboys at certain points. He was pretty much the founding member of GROZ. I don't know where this idea that he's an uber-homer came from.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

where did i change my arguement?

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2911803&postcount=101

 

[Rampage]

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2911803&postcount=101

:laugh2: exactly what i thought.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

:laugh2: exactly what i thought.

Excellent!

Admitting your problem is the first step.

 

[Rampage]

Excellent!

Admitting your problem is the first step.

what did i change in my arguement? was cause i 1st said they didn't have 1 starting lb playing and than said they didn't have there entire starting lb core? i mean you really make no sense.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

what did i change in my arguement? was cause i 1st said they didn't have 1 starting lb playing and than said they didn't have there entire starting lb core? i mean you really make no sense.

I'm the one who makes no sense?

You claimed that the Giants without Pierce was equivalent to the Cowboys without their entire starting defensive line.

:laugh2:

 

[Rampage]

I'm the one who makes no sense?

You claimed that the Giants without Pierce was equivalent to the Cowboys without their entire starting defensive line.

:laugh2:

no i didn't. like i said pierce was just 1 example. the equivalent of the Giants without there starting lb core is us without our starting d-line. i already said this too in the post where you quoted me and picked it a part. you probably still won't understand because you're not very smart like i also said in that post. read a book man

 

[Chocolate Lab]

If we're still talking about our defense...

Didn't our starters only give up three points? Or was that some other game I was watching?

 

[ScipioCowboy]

no i didn't. like i said pierce was just 1 example. the equivalent of the Giants without there starting lb core is us without our starting d-line.

Yes. You did:

trust me man. I live in Ny and see every giants game. Pierce is an average linebacker but he gets everybody lined up correctly and does his homework. imagine our defense missing all our starting d-linemen?

you said the giants strength on defense is there d-line correct? i said they didn't have 1 starting linebacker playing. so since the linebackers are our strength i said imagine if our d-line was backups like the giants linebackers were. understand?

Your words are your words. You can't change them now. You should simply admit your error and move on.

i already said this too in the post where you quoted me and picked it a part. you probably still won't understand because you're not very smart like i also said in that post. read a book man

A good starting place for you would be rereading your own posts for clarity. Then, maybe you can move up to heavier reading, such as magazine advertisements and children's books.

 

[Rampage]

If we're still talking about our defense...

Didn't our starters only give up three points? Or was that some other game I was watching?

people are concerned with the lack of intensity(which comes in spirts from this team) and lack of turnovers(which since last season we just aren't very good at)

 

[windward]

If we're still talking about our defense...

Didn't our starters only give up three points? Or was that some other game I was watching?

Yeah but the fg was at the end of the half rather than say, the middle of the first quarter.

As I'm sure you're aware this is a much more serious affair, regardless if the quantity is the same.

Mathematically I've broken it down to a simple algebraic formula.

a > a

Makes sense , doesn't it?

 

[Rampage]

Yes. You did:





Your words are your words. You can't change them now. You should simply admit your error and move on.



A good starting place for you would be rereading your own posts for clarity. Then, maybe you can move up to heavier reading, such as magazine advertisements and children's books.

the 3rd quote in your post says it. I can't believe you don't see it. you're like a box of rocks up there man.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

the 3rd quote in your post says it. I can't believe you don't see it. you're like a box of rocks up there man.

I still can't believe you're trying to deny your words when they've been put right before you.

It ain't just a river in Egypt.

Oh, and when I said "magazine advertisements," I mean the ones in Children's Digest, Disney Magazine, and the like.

 

[Rampage]

I still can't believe you're trying to deny your words when they've been put right before you.

It ain't just a river in Egypt.

Oh, and when I said "magazine advertisements," I mean the ones in Children's Digest, Disney Magazine, and the like.

i'm not denying anything. you didn't understand something. i even made it easier to understand like in that 3rd quote and you still didn't get it.

here, this book fits you well

 

[ScipioCowboy]

i'm not denying anything. you didn't understand something. i even made it easier to understand like in that 3rd quote and you still didn't get it

The third quote? You mean this one?

you said the giants strength on defense is there d-line correct? i said they didn't have 1 starting linebacker playing. so since the linebackers are our strength i said imagine if our d-line was backups like the giants linebackers were. understand?

And let's not forget it was preceded by this one:

the Giants didn't have 1 of there starting linebackers playing tonight and atleast 1 of there starting corners.

Thanks for making my point for me.

And while we're on the topic of intelligence, I should mention that the correct usage is their, not there. Their is possessive.

One incorrect usage can be dismissed as a mistake. Repeated misuse through two posts constitutes a rather disturbing trend.

This may help: