Our Restricted Free Agents

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
18,436
Reaction score
25,817
Seeing a lot of news of other teams tendering or not tendering their free agents, anyone have any news on our players?

If not, does anyone know when the deadline to tender players is?
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,630
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Solving the Cowboys head scratchers in restricted free agency

4:33 PM Fri, Feb 26, 2010 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Todd Archer/Reporter Bio | E-mail | News tips

Stephen Jones said Thursday from Indianapolis that the team has some decisions to make regarding the 13 restricted free agents, saying there are some "head scratchers" in terms of whether to tender a player a deal or not.

Who is Jones referring to? Not Miles Austin, Stephen Bowen, Marcus Spears, Jason Hatcher or Gerald Sensabaugh. They will all be tendered and likely the high tender if not the highest (Austin). Cletis Gordon and Shaun Suisham are the easy non-tenders.

Then you get into guys like Cory Procter, Sam Hurd, Duke Preston, Junior Siavii and Pat Watkins and Pat McQuistan.

Procter has value because he can play guard and both center spots. Hurd is among the Cowboys best special teamers and has made plays at wide receiver too. Watkins is a good special teamer and is a decent backup safety. Siavii had a solid season as Jay Ratliff's backup at nose tackle. McQuistan has been around for four years so you don't want to give up on an investment. Preston didn't play a snap last season but he can play two spots, like Procter.

Hurd and Procter were given second-round tenders last year and no team made a play on them. That cost the Cowboys $1.545 million last year and would cost them $1.759 million this year.

If the Cowboys make a move on Ken Hamlin, would they like to have Watkins around as insurance in 2010? If they don't tender Siavii, then the Cowboys do not have a backup nose tackle on the current roster and would have to look in the draft or the lower end of the free agency pool.

McQuistan and Preston at least offer some familiarity but would cost at least $1.176 million to keep both of them. Would you want that much in a backup O-lineman that could be inactive every game? Well, they paid $2.5 million to Montrae Holland last year and got zero snaps from him, so there is a track record.

Just a guess, but in the end I think Procter, Hurd, Watkins and McQuistan get tendered. I think they try to sign the other guys to the minimum worth $630,000.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,807
Reaction score
112,646
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WoodysGirl;3289476 said:
Procter has value because he can play guard and both center spots. Hurd is among the Cowboys best special teamers and has made plays at wide receiver too. Watkins is a good special teamer and is a decent backup safety. Siavii had a solid season as Jay Ratliff's backup at nose tackle. McQuistan has been around for four years so you don't want to give up on an investment. Preston didn't play a snap last season but he can play two spots, like Procter.
Proctor, McQ and Preston - can they one day be starters? If not, let them go. McQ has been here 4 years and done nothing. Give up a investment? How about cut the fat of 4 wasted years and move on. Draft all their replacements in a couple of months.

Hurd and Watkins - yes they need to stay. Both are affordable and make plays.

Siavii - I'd like to see a upgrade here. If it weren't for the Cowboys, he would likely be out of the NFL.
 
Top