Peterson has ligament tear

03EBZ06

Need2Speed
Messages
7,984
Reaction score
411
November 12th, 2007 – 12:47 PM by Judd Zulgad

Rookie running back Adrian Peterson has a partial tear of his lateral collateral ligament but won’t need surgery, Vikings coach Brad Childress said at his press conference today at Winter Park. Peterson has been ruled out of Sunday’s game against Oakland but the team is not yet certain how much time he will miss.

Childress, however, did say he’s been told that the injury is not season-ending. The LCL is much less commonly injured than the anterior cruciate, medial collateral and posterial cruciate ligaments. The LCL holds the outside of the knee together, keeping the leg from collapsing outwards.

Medically speaking, a sprain is the same thing as a partial tear. On a scale of 1 to 3, with 3 being the most serious, Peterson’s sprain is “2-plus,” Childress said.

Childress said the “good news” is that Peterson’s knee is otherwise stable. “The PCL, ACL, meniscus, all the other structures are good in that knee,” Childress said. “I’m told that’s a good healing ligament. If it was a lineman they would be braced up and play, maybe. We’ll reserve judgment on what’s appropriate for that at the time. Everybody heals differently.”

Asked about the best-case scenario for Peterson’s recovery, Childress said: “I’m real hesitant to put a timeline on that thing. … He was wanting to go back in the game yesterday, but we didn’t think that was obviously a prudent thing to do with where the game was.”

Peterson was hurt in the third quarter of the Vikings’ 34-0 loss Sunday at Green Bay after catching a screen pass. Peterson took off up the middle for an 11-yard gain but was brought down when cornerback Al Harris dived at the rookie’s knees to make the tackle.

“It’s a stability factor,” Childress said. “It’s [Peterson’s] right leg, when he rushes right, he would notice that. He’s not going to feel anything when he’s running straight ahead but obviously he’s not a straight-ahead guy and he plays and stuffs that leg in the ground much different than an offensive lineman probably would.

“We’re not going to put him out there until he can protect himself. He wouldn’t have all of his faculties. You’d make him worse.”

According to Childress, there will a “whole protocol” of treatment for Peterson’s knee that will include range of motion work, weight work and icing.

“It’s not a significant amount of swelling that goes on with that thing,” Childress said. “He’ll work just as hard at treating it to get back on the field.”

Childress admitted he was relieved to find out the injury wasn’t worse. ”One of those other bodies in there, the anterior cruciate, you’re talking about a season-ending injury and ramping up to try to get back for training camp,” Childress said. “That’s not one of those.”

Childress did not feel Harris’ hit on Peterson was dirty. Peterson said the same thing after the game. ”It just looked like somebody was trying to enter and get him on the ground,” Childress said. “I didn’t think it was a particularly malicious hit.”

As for whether Peterson could have avoided the hit, Childress said: “[It was] probably just a football play he couldn’t avoid. The guy was probably a little out of his scope of vision, so he was straight up and down. The safety and Al kind of entered in the side. No, I don’t think he could [have done anything].”

This means Chester Taylor will return to his starting job and get the majority of carries in the upcoming weeks.

“I think Chester did a great job of entering the game [at Green Bay] and picking up some slack,” Childress said. “He obviously has a track record. He’s a good player as well. Just like I mention to you every week, we expect somebody to pick up from there, both him and Mewelde Moore as well.”

http://www.startribune.com/blogs/vikings/?p=1129
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Why would you risk this guy?

I Minnesota doesn't sit him down for the rest of the season, they will prove themselves to be the idiots we all believe them to be.

Seriously, they should fix that knee now and give him as much time as possible to ready himself for the next season. There not going anywhere this year. Might as well protect the best player they've ever had at that position.

JMO
 

StanleySpadowski

Active Member
Messages
4,815
Reaction score
0
Does this really surprise anyone?

Was anyone really naive enough to believe that Peterson was going to play all 16 games this year?

Great talent but the injury history really has to be taken into account and another reason that RBs should never be taken in the top 10 of the draft.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
StanleySpadowski;1762112 said:
Does this really surprise anyone?

Was anyone really naive enough to believe that Peterson was going to play all 16 games this year?

Great talent but the injury history really has to be taken into account and another reason that RBs should never be taken in the top 10 of the draft.

:hammer:
 

PBJTime

Semper Fidelis
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
1
StanleySpadowski;1762112 said:
Does this really surprise anyone?

Was anyone really naive enough to believe that Peterson was going to play all 16 games this year?

Great talent but the injury history really has to be taken into account and another reason that RBs should never be taken in the top 10 of the draft.

Did you see the hit his knee took? Injury history has nothing to do with it. Like I've said before, McNabb played every game in college. There are no guarantees with anybody. But, alas, people have been waiting to say, "I told you so."
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
ABQCOWBOY;1762157 said:

Bump? You don't want McFadden?



Guess you weren't a big fan of Tony Dorsett either, huh?


:D
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Rack;1763102 said:
Bump? You don't want McFadden?



Guess you weren't a big fan of Tony Dorsett either, huh?


:D


I don't see the correlation myself. I mean, yeah, I think McFadden is a great player but I dont' think we need him. In the time TD played, high draft picks represented talent and that's significant but in todays game, high draft picks represent money and cap and that's a huge deal. To me, I don't see the need for trading up for a back like McFadden, which is what we would have to do. I'd rather take a guy who can add to the offense as a piece of the running game as opposed to a guy who is coming in to be the franchise back. We have a feature back in MBIII. To me, he's the right guy for our offense. If we can get a guy who can come in and make something happen on third down or be a carry the load back if needed for a few games, that would be ideal to me. I think those guys can be found later in the draft. That's kind of how I see it.
 
Top