Peterson wants at least 25 Million guaranteed to sign with Dallas

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
If we had to pay a rb 25 million guaranteed. I'd rather give it to a than Murray.

Don't want AD for that kind of money.
 

Fredd

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,995
Reaction score
2,238
It's great to want things...

...if this quote is true, then I wouldn't even consider talking to him...no thanx
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
McCoy got 26.5 million in guaranteed money.

If we could get AP for a 4 year 32 million dollar contract with 25 million guaranteed, it would make a lot of sense for us. 12 million dollar signing bonus


Year 1 - 3 million dollars
Year 2 - 4 million dollars
Year 3 - 6 million dollars
Year 4 - 7 million dollars

Prorated bonus would be 3 million a year

first two years would cost us 13 million dollars.

If you wanted to cut him in year 3 it would cost 9 million in dead money, but you could split the cost over two years. Likely you keep him at least for the first 3 years.

No thanks.
 

Mookie

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,096
Reaction score
2,213
All I know is he is the only player in Free Agency that makes me think our odds of winning a Superbowl go drastically up if he is on our roster.

That's what the Vikings thought back in the day with Herschel Walker. I don't know. A runningback that age with his injury history. I'd rather go young or cheaper, and get defensive playmakers plus a #2 WR.
 

Danger

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
945
Guess you won't be wearing the star for the foreseeable future AD
 

BigStar

Stop chasing
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
17,081
Not just me Garrett talked about the notion of plug and play RB is a load of BS. It is for the simple mind and your madden players. there are a lot of bust RB who come into the league. It is not that easy finding an all purpose RB and I have see coaches like a BP and Jimmy who would not start a RB who can't block. When you have Blitzer's coming that RB often is the only thing between a sack and a big play, you can't have RB whiffing on blocks. In terms of rushing Murray has proven himself as a tough runner and is also very good out of the backfield. I agree there is a limit that Dallas should spend but thinking anyone can do the job is pure BS

That's coaching and willingness on the RB (pass blocking) and scouts should be resp. for drafting these features as potential attributes to work on, etc But you can't coach the running skills (draft = cheap). Of course a young vet RB who has knowledge of the scheme will naturally be better at picking up blitzers. But you don't overpay for the intricacies, you pay for the running skills. RBs with running skills can be taught PB @ a much cheaper rate that allows you to allocate resources properly (QB, OL, DL, CB, WR) esp when your DL is as weak as ours.
 
Last edited:
Messages
10,108
Reaction score
7,327
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Not just me Garrett talked about the notion of plug and play RB is a load of BS. It is for the simple mind and your madden players. there are a lot of bust RB who come into the league. It is not that easy finding an all purpose RB and I have see coaches like a BP and Jimmy who would not start a RB who can't block. When you have Blitzer's coming that RB often is the only thing between a sack and a big play, you can't have RB whiffing on blocks. In terms of rushing Murray has proven himself as a tough runner and is also very good out of the backfield. I agree there is a limit that Dallas should spend but thinking anyone can do the job is pure BS

http://i22.***BLOCKED***/albums/b318/dscuyamungue/petersonspanking_zps1781c053.jpg
 

DallasDW00ds0n

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,179
Reaction score
11,634
Okay that's his contract demands but what are the vikings demands now just to get him
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
That's coaching and willingness on the RB (pass blocking). You can't coach running skills. Of course a young vet RB who has knowledge of the scheme will naturally be better at picking up blitzers. But you don't overpay for the intricacies, you pay for the running skills. RBs with running skills can be taught PB @ a much cheaper rate that allows you to allocate resources properly (QB, OL, DL, CB, WR) esp when your DL is as weak as ours.

Romo and his back would beg to differ.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,683
Reaction score
18,036
In all seriosity, AP would, at the toppermost of the poppermost, be a stop-gap RB for us. Even the immortals have limited shelf space in the NFL. Too old, too expensive, too much baggage. Pass, Jerra, pls.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,420
Reaction score
212,337
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yeah, I'd probably pass.

But if the alternative is handing out a long term deal to DeMarco Murray, I'd rather go with Peterson.

I coveted Peterson. It's to the point now where I just don't want Murray.
 

BigStar

Stop chasing
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
17,081
Romo and his back would beg to differ.

So we are seriously going to pay this ransom for pass blocking? Not to mention it makes our coaching staff look inept if they can't teach a young player this resp? We can coach that up in a rookie, or allow Randle/Williams to handle that role if the potential rook is slow in this dept (work them in throughout the year).
 
Top