Pft: 7/23

JonCJG

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
162
POSTED 7:21 p.m. EDT, July 23, 2006

PFT PRESEASON POWER RANKINGS: NUMBER 13

Yes, we've missed a couple of days of this Power Rankings thing. And we've received surprisingly few complaints about it.

Makes us wonder whether anyone really (sniff, honk) cares.

Well, we still care -- and we've got a baker's dozen of prime pastries still to offer up.

Now that we've waded through the Salisbury steak, we sure as hell aren't going to drop the ball as we get to the filet mignon table.

Of course, before we start plowing through the playoff-level teams, there's one small matter to deal with. The last team that, per our list, is on the wrong side looking in (for now) on the postseason tournament.

The Dallas Cowboys.

They're a trendy pick to make it to the Super Bowl, due in large part to the addition of receiver Terrell Owens.

But even though T.O. is among the handful of NFL wideouts who can stretch the field and command double coverage, we don't think he's enough of a force to push a team that was merely on the fringes of the playoffs in 2005 to the top of the toughest division in the league.

Really, how much of a net impact did he have on the Eagles? They'd been to the NFC title game three years in a row before he arrived, and they made it all of one step farther in 2004 -- with an injured Owens on the sidelines leading cheers and shouting for the only time in his Philly career, "We love we some we."

And the NFC East was a lot less competitive in 2004. The Giants were breaking in Eli Manning, the Commanders were breaking in Joe Gibbs, and the Cowboys were breaking in Vinny Testaverde.

This time around, Owens lands in an NFC East that is far more competitive, and which might provide far stiffer challenges to his team, even when two defenders are tracking his every move.

The other newcomers of note on offense are linemen Kyle Kosier and Jason Fabini. Long-time fixture Larry Allen is long gone.

On defense, La'Roi Glover got the boot, as an overdue byproduct of the team's switch to the 3-4. Also gone is linebacker Dat Nguyen, who retired.

The new addition to an otherwise young defense is old-man safety Marcus Coleman.
The draft brought linebacker Bobby Carpenter and tight end Anthony Fasano in the first two rounds. Unless the Cowboys plan to make Fasano a lineman, it looks like there will be plenty of double-tight-end sets in the team's future, given the recent signing of Jason Witten to a long-term deal.

The biggest question mark, in our view? Can the offensive line give aging Drew Bledsoe enough time to get the ball to T.O., Terry Glenn, Witten, etc? Think back to 2005, when Randy Moss landed in Oakland and the pundits were panting over the possibilities, given Kerry Collins' cannon arm. The only problem was that Collins spent more time looking out of his earhole than he did searching for Moss in the secondary.

And if Bledsoe should get the Mo Lewis treatment in 2006, who takes Drew's place?

Tony Romo? Drew Henson?

Bottom line -- the arrival of Owens has prompted most members of the media to overlook this potential flaw, and if Bledsoe can't get the ball into the hands of Owens on a consistent basis, it's going to get ugly very quickly in Big D.

Now, for the fantasy grades:

Quarterback: Bledsoe was solid in 2005, and Owens should make him better. His passer rating and his total yards were the highest since his first season in Buffalo. He also started every game for the fourth straight season. Still, his touchdowns-to-picks ratio was a little high, and we're concerned about those 3.1 sacks per game that he took in 2005. He gets a B.

Running back: Julius Jones was expected to be one of the top running backs in 2005. He didn't even crack the 1,000 yard mark. Whether he's the go-to guy is unclear at this point, given that Marion Barber matched him in average yards per carry. Our guess is that they'll split touches, making Jones a C+ at best.

Wide receiver: Owens remains one of the best in the sport, and he's good for roughly one touchdown per week. With that said, we'd be leery about the guy, given everything that has happened over the past year. In most leagues, there will be someone who'll make him one of the first few picks in the draft. Even though we still rate him as an A-, let the guy or gal who's convinced he's an A+++ take him higher than he should go. That said, we'd be sure to throw a middle-round pick on Terry Glenn, who will get plenty of single coverage across from Owens. Glenn could be the SOFD.

Tight end: Jason Witten's numbers weren't far behind Keyshawn Johnson's last year, and Witten likely will get plenty of looks down the middle as defenses try to cope with T.O. and T.G. We give Witten a B.

Defense: A middle of the pack unit in 2005. Pick them if all of the obvious targets are gone.

Kicker: Mike Vanderjagt likely will get drafted higher than he should in most leagues, based on name recognition and 2005 numbers. But he still could have a solid year in Dallas. We give him a B+.


POSTED 6:16 p.m. EDT, July 23, 2006

CHIEFS, LAW TIE THE KNOT

Adam Teicher of the Kansas City Star reports that the Chiefs have reached an agreement with cornerback Ty Law.

It's a five-year deal. Earlier on Sunday, the Boston Globe reported that the pending offer was worth $30 million.

"It got to a number where we were comfortable and they were comfortable," Chiefs president/general manager Carl Peterson said. "Hopefully, he will be well worth the effort."

Law definitely improves a defensive backfield that needs plenty of help, and he'll rejoin in Kansas City his head coach in New York from 2005, Herm Edwards.

The fact that the deal took so long to get done suggests that Law finally reduced his inflated asking price. We also suspect that the contract is, in reality, a one-year deal worth $5 million or so, with incentives that can push it higher.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,309
Reaction score
102,232
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Dangerous Dave said:
Bledsoe(34) is 'aging', but McNair(33) is a 'veteran' .......

whatever

consider the source...and not a very good one at that
 

littlewebs

Everything I type is a lie. Except that. And that.
Messages
433
Reaction score
0
Dangerous Dave said:
Bledsoe(34) is 'aging', but McNair(33) is a 'veteran' .......

whatever

That's weird... someone bashing Drew Bledsoe.

If I didn't know any better, and just believed what I read, "Drew" is not really Bledsoe's first name. It is his second middle name. His first name is "Immobile" and his first middle name is "Quarterback," making his official full name Immobile Quarterback Drew Bledsoe.

Who would name their kid that?
 

Shaun

Member
Messages
326
Reaction score
5
Dangerous Dave said:
Bledsoe(34) is 'aging', but McNair(33) is a 'veteran' .......

whatever

I've never understood that term. Everyone is aging.
 

Hiero

New Member
Messages
3,075
Reaction score
0
pft is filth. big surprise nobodys complained they havent been writing because nobody likes them
 

Kobal

Member
Messages
334
Reaction score
1
KD said:
POSTED 7:21 p.m. EDT, July 23, 2006

PFT PRESEASON POWER RANKINGS: NUMBER 13

Yes, we've missed a couple of days of this Power Rankings thing. And we've received surprisingly few complaints about it.

Makes us wonder whether anyone really (sniff, honk) cares.

Well, we still care -- and we've got a baker's dozen of prime pastries still to offer up.

Now that we've waded through the Salisbury steak, we sure as hell aren't going to drop the ball as we get to the filet mignon table.

Of course, before we start plowing through the playoff-level teams, there's one small matter to deal with. The last team that, per our list, is on the wrong side looking in (for now) on the postseason tournament.

The Dallas Cowboys.

They're a trendy pick to make it to the Super Bowl, due in large part to the addition of receiver Terrell Owens.

But even though T.O. is among the handful of NFL wideouts who can stretch the field and command double coverage, we don't think he's enough of a force to push a team that was merely on the fringes of the playoffs in 2005 to the top of the toughest division in the league.

Really, how much of a net impact did he have on the Eagles? They'd been to the NFC title game three years in a row before he arrived, and they made it all of one step farther in 2004 -- with an injured Owens on the sidelines leading cheers and shouting for the only time in his Philly career, "We love we some we."

And the NFC East was a lot less competitive in 2004. The Giants were breaking in Eli Manning, the Commanders were breaking in Joe Gibbs, and the Cowboys were breaking in Vinny Testaverde.

This time around, Owens lands in an NFC East that is far more competitive, and which might provide far stiffer challenges to his team, even when two defenders are tracking his every move.

The other newcomers of note on offense are linemen Kyle Kosier and Jason Fabini. Long-time fixture Larry Allen is long gone.

On defense, La'Roi Glover got the boot, as an overdue byproduct of the team's switch to the 3-4. Also gone is linebacker Dat Nguyen, who retired.

The new addition to an otherwise young defense is old-man safety Marcus Coleman.
The draft brought linebacker Bobby Carpenter and tight end Anthony Fasano in the first two rounds. Unless the Cowboys plan to make Fasano a lineman, it looks like there will be plenty of double-tight-end sets in the team's future, given the recent signing of Jason Witten to a long-term deal.

The biggest question mark, in our view? Can the offensive line give aging Drew Bledsoe enough time to get the ball to T.O., Terry Glenn, Witten, etc? Think back to 2005, when Randy Moss landed in Oakland and the pundits were panting over the possibilities, given Kerry Collins' cannon arm. The only problem was that Collins spent more time looking out of his earhole than he did searching for Moss in the secondary.

And if Bledsoe should get the Mo Lewis treatment in 2006, who takes Drew's place?

Tony Romo? Drew Henson?

Bottom line -- the arrival of Owens has prompted most members of the media to overlook this potential flaw, and if Bledsoe can't get the ball into the hands of Owens on a consistent basis, it's going to get ugly very quickly in Big D.

Now, for the fantasy grades:

Quarterback: Bledsoe was solid in 2005, and Owens should make him better. His passer rating and his total yards were the highest since his first season in Buffalo. He also started every game for the fourth straight season. Still, his touchdowns-to-picks ratio was a little high, and we're concerned about those 3.1 sacks per game that he took in 2005. He gets a B.

Running back: Julius Jones was expected to be one of the top running backs in 2005. He didn't even crack the 1,000 yard mark. Whether he's the go-to guy is unclear at this point, given that Marion Barber matched him in average yards per carry. Our guess is that they'll split touches, making Jones a C+ at best.

Wide receiver: Owens remains one of the best in the sport, and he's good for roughly one touchdown per week. With that said, we'd be leery about the guy, given everything that has happened over the past year. In most leagues, there will be someone who'll make him one of the first few picks in the draft. Even though we still rate him as an A-, let the guy or gal who's convinced he's an A+++ take him higher than he should go. That said, we'd be sure to throw a middle-round pick on Terry Glenn, who will get plenty of single coverage across from Owens. Glenn could be the SOFD.

Tight end: Jason Witten's numbers weren't far behind Keyshawn Johnson's last year, and Witten likely will get plenty of looks down the middle as defenses try to cope with T.O. and T.G. We give Witten a B.

Defense: A middle of the pack unit in 2005. Pick them if all of the obvious targets are gone.

Kicker: Mike Vanderjagt likely will get drafted higher than he should in most leagues, based on name recognition and 2005 numbers. But he still could have a solid year in Dallas. We give him a B+.


:jerk:
 

the_h0wey

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
2,228
weird i thought we picked up a totally solid MLB named Ayodele but i guess not this article from a "expert'' doesnt mention anything. I think Akin will have a huge impact on our defense next year more so than anyone thinks
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
All you need know is that PFT's "Super Bowl team" last year was - get this - the Oakland Raiders!

:lmao:
 

dmq

If I'm so pretty, why am I available?
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
941
Even if they pick us #1, we still have to play the season.
 

SA_Gunslinger

Official CZ Ea-girls hater
Messages
4,788
Reaction score
0
KD said:


And the NFC East was a lot less competitive in 2004. The Giants were breaking in Eli Manning, the Commanders were breaking in Joe Gibbs, and the Cowboys were breaking in Vinny Testaverde[/FONT]​


that's pretty funny right there!!!



true, we don't have proven backups at QB, and julius jones needs to stay healthy, and the o line needs to protect, and all the second year guys need to step it up....but these are all "if's" that are very attainable.


barring injury, this is easily a playoff team.
 

ravidubey

Active Member
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
20
The 2004 Eagles were doing what they should have to the weak NFC, running the table. It took the Steelers to actually defeat them. The closest the NFC East, or anyone, got to taking them down was when Roy knocked out TO!

Beyond that, the Eagles had two meaningless losses playing their scrubs in the final two games! They had already clinched HFA throughout the playoffs.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
KD said:
Really, how much of a net impact did he have on the Eagles? They'd been to the NFC title game three years in a row before he arrived, and they made it all of one step farther in 2004

Hilarious line of questioning. The Eagles could only go one step further. Nothing else was even possible. But, they fault him for not having that much of a "net" impact on that team, even though he was the ONLY Eagle to even show up in the super bowl. How much of an impact did he REALLY make?

All he could, ******.:rolleyes:
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
superpunk said:
Hilarious line of questioning. The Eagles could only go one step further. Nothing else was even possible. But, they fault him for not having that much of a "net" impact on that team, even though he was the ONLY Eagle to even show up in the super bowl. How much of an impact did he REALLY make?

All he could, ******.:rolleyes:

yeah, and considering having TO for a regular season, DNabb had his most productive year, by far, as a pro, and the Eagles had their best regular season ever in that run
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
the_h0wey said:
weird i thought we picked up a totally solid MLB named Ayodele but i guess not this article from a "expert'' doesnt mention anything. I think Akin will have a huge impact on our defense next year more so than anyone thinks

i agree 100%...he will be a vast improvement over scott shanle :shootfoot

also look for ryan fowler...ppl have said it before here but i really like his attitude and size to be able to spell ayodele or james and still make plays, especially stuffing the run
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
Article fails any credibility check when the only thing of note it can say about the defense is that they lost Glover and Dat.

Forget that it's their 2nd year in the 3-4, the defense Parcells has been itching to get back to, but the one he just now has the personel to flourish with.

Nevermind the fact that last year the defense was loaded with brilliant rookie talent who this year will be 2nd year vets with a whole season under their belts.

And there should be no need to mention whatsoever that Big Bill and company went heavy on defense in the draft again as well as in free agency, with their recent success picking them on that side of the ball and all.

Oh yeah and I'm sure Anthony Henry being back at full health shouldn't raise any eyebrows at all. Since all that does is guarantee Dallas as good a CB group 1 thru 4 as there is in the league.

Because none of that would be relevant to how the team might perform this season.

I hope these journalists keep fixating on TO and the offense, that way when what I believe is going to be the strength of the team jumps up and steals the day, I'll be able to gloat because all of my suspicions will have been confirmed. That they have absolutely no idea what the hell they're writing about.
 

jrockster77

New Member
Messages
292
Reaction score
0
the_h0wey said:
weird i thought we picked up a totally solid MLB named Ayodele but i guess not this article from a "expert'' doesnt mention anything. I think Akin will have a huge impact on our defense next year more so than anyone thinks

Isn't Ayodele an OLB?? Just askin...
 
Top