News: PFT: Decision to take 64-yard field goal off the board changed everything for the Cowboys
- Thread starter Reality
- Start date
Reality
Staff member
- Messages
- 31,186
- Reaction score
- 72,433
I knew the moment they took the points of the board any remote chance of winning the game was completely gone.
You have a team struggling to score points and you take a 64-yard field goal off the board.
What was McCarthy expecting? They would get closer to try another shorter field goal?
You have a team struggling to score points and you take a 64-yard field goal off the board.
What was McCarthy expecting? They would get closer to try another shorter field goal?
ChronicCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,420
- Reaction score
- 15,804
It was the right move. Going for it on 4th down at the 5 was dumb. Fake punt early in the game was stupid. But any team would have accepted the personal foul.
Streifenkarl
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,041
- Reaction score
- 4,352
I agree. No one would have taken the 3 points here.
Creeper
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,581
- Reaction score
- 19,745
I think you get a 15 yard penalty and an automatic first down you have to take the penalty and a fresh set of downs. There is a chance they score a TD, but you have to think you can at least get the FG back if you can't get the TD. I mean you have the best kicker in the league you can't lack the confidence to use him. But if you use that thinking, then when it is 4th and 5 you have to kick the FG.
BotchedLobotomy
Wide Right
- Messages
- 15,416
- Reaction score
- 23,406
I am confident that every single coach in the league would do the same thing.
Reality
Staff member
- Messages
- 31,186
- Reaction score
- 72,433
You would normally if you had your starting quarterback and had an offense that could put up points by scoring touchdowns.
The Cowboys though were struggling for points and they had 3 already on the board.
They gambled the 3 for an extra 4 using an anemic offense that's realistic best-case scenario would have been yet-another-field-goal attempt that might be missed or blocked.
- Messages
- 101,362
- Reaction score
- 111,011
Reality
Staff member
- Messages
- 31,186
- Reaction score
- 72,433
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
- Messages
- 37,017
- Reaction score
- 11,185
Um, no. That didn't change anything. We were always losing that game.
links18
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,258
- Reaction score
- 19,996
As an anemic, this offends me. I could run a better offense than what the Cowboys are putting out there right now.
sunalsorises
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,275
- Reaction score
- 5,175
Dallas shouldn't punt or kick a FG the rest of the year. They should go for it on fourth down no matter what, honestly. They can't stop anyone so they might as well try to score as many TDs as possible.
John813
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,620
- Reaction score
- 36,552
So, you want them to be shutout most games? lol
sunalsorises
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,275
- Reaction score
- 5,175
Is there a difference between 34-10 and 34-7? Be exciting the rest of the year. While we're at it, they should always go for 2. They could have lost that game 34-8.
Whirlwin
Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
- Messages
- 25,982
- Reaction score
- 17,600
Never, take points off the board. That’s my personal opinion.
hutch1254
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,792
- Reaction score
- 589
I felt the same way. My thought was because of who you have currently on the field. The odds of this offensive group on the field committing a mistake or failing to execute a play (4th down in this instance) are currently at their highest. I had no faith they could continue on after the penalty and get a touchdown. Maybe a shorter FG yes but I felt pretty solid the unit would walk away with a shorter FG or nothing. What a mess things are. I'm resigned to trying to watch player development for a future that is restricted by the GM.