Pft

JonCJG

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
162
POSTED 6:58 a.m. EDT, June 22, 2006

BOOM OR BUST FOR BROOKS


At a time when character for NFL players matters more than ever (at least in 29 or 30 NFL cities ), the fate of former Virginia linebacker Ahmad Brooks is squarely up in the air.

A league source tells us that, if Brooks is healthy and can get his weight in the range of 260 pounds, he will be in demand. Before an injury that limited him to only six games in 2005, some scouts regarded Brooks as the best linebacking prospect in the last 30 years.

Teams will get a first-hand look at Brooks on Thursday in Charlottesville, for an individualized Pro Day session that will be closed to the media and the public. Brooks will be available via the NFL's Supplemental Draft on July 13.

In 2004, Brooks was a second-team All-American as a sophomore for Al Groh's Cavaliers. In March, he and two other players were dismissed from the team. Groh never cited any specific reason for the decision, relying generally on the concept of "violation of team policy."

Surely, though, Groh's old friends in the NFL (such as Bill Parcells) have gotten the real story on Brooks. But it still will be hard to decipher the truth. As we see every April in the days and weeks preceding the draft, the teams interested in Brooks will start spreading bad stuff about him -- and the teams who aren't interested will start singing his praises in the hopes that a competitor will piss away a high pick in the Supplemental Draft, which results in a forfeiture of the corresponding selection in the 2007 draft, and which then automatically pushes the field of available players in April one spot closer to the other 31 teams.

With all that said, we're hearing that the Giants, Dolphins, and Bucs might be interested in Brooks. Whether they really are remains to be seen.
But the Bengals also should be interested, at least in theory. After all, Brooks was arrested in March 2003 for marijuana possession. He pleaded no contest and was sentenced to six months' probation.

Given the unusual rules that apply to the Supplemental Draft (which we'll dig up at some point over the next couple of weeks), an odd poker game of sorts can unfold regarding the specific round in which a team puts in a claim for a given player. In 2003, the Cowboys arguably duped the Texans into burning a second-round pick on Georgia Tech running back Tony Hollings, a speed back with limited college experience. He was a complete and total bust, and the Texans cut ties with Hollings earlier this year. He signed with the Bears in May.

Over the years, the first-round picks in the Supplemental Draft have been quarterback Dave Brown (Giants) in 1992, receiver Rob Moore (Jets) in 1990, running back Bobby Humphrey (Broncos) in 1989, quarterback Timm Rosenbach (Cardinals) in 1989, quarterback Steve Walsh (Cowboys) in 1989, linebacker Brian Bosworth (Seahawks) in 1987, quarterback Bernie Kosar (Browns) in 1985, and quarterback Dave Wilson (Saints) in 1981.

Since the NFL launched its free agency/salary cap system in 1993, no team has devoted a first-round pick to the Supplemental Draft. And that makes sense. With players available every March at every position via unrestricted and restricted free agency, team needs and wants are filled long before July, reducing the temptation to use a pick merely for the purposes of picking up another player.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Given the recent off field problems Cincy has had with 2 of their draft picks, Steelers problems with Holmes, etc., there's 2 teams not interested in Brooks. I'm not surprised that Giants, Buc or Dolphins interested as I think all 3 will take chance on just about anybody. On second thought, Dolphins might bow out given them most recent problems with Ricky Williams.

Wonder if Parcells interested cause we all know he loves Lbs but like they say he knows whole story from Groh. If Cowboys do bid for Brooks doubt it would be higher then a 4th given at least 2 problems that we know Brooks has had. And Groh certainly doesn't kick a quality player like Brooks off the team for minor problem.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
>>>As we see every April in the days and weeks preceding the draft, the teams interested in Brooks will start spreading bad stuff about him<<<

teams wont have to look very hard to find the "bad stuff"

David
 

JonCJG

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
162
Could be a good pickup if

1. He's in shape
2. We get him with a day 2 pick
3. Parcells deems him Draft worthy

If we have Bradie or Akin go down, it sure would be nice to have a young stud to step in.
 

lspain1

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,372
Reaction score
33
Unless Parcells knows that this guy has changed, I would be surprised if the Cowboys had any interest.
 

lurkercowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,066
Reaction score
1,352
The best LB prospect in 30 years!!??!!??!!

That is a heck of a statement considering some of the LBs that have come down the pike in that time. But we have to remember that Brian Bosworth was a highly rated prospect also.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,683
Reaction score
12,392
Longboysfan said:
Were set at LB - let's move on.

What a silly comment.

in the 3-4 you are NEVER set at LB.

let me ask this -- if James or Ayodele go down what does our ILB corp look like? Fowler? Shanle? Burnett playing there for the first time? One of the UDFAs?

That doesn't sound set to me.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Roll the dice Jerry & Bill. Listen to Chris Canty. No guts, no glory.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
He's worth a 5th rounder.

Nothing more.

If you spend a pick on this guy and bring him in he will already be behind all your other rookies and will have missed half your summer workouts. AND this is a guy who needs workouts and structure.

All that and he flatly was poor last season. He would not have been a day 1 prospect had he entered the draft which is why he did not. After getting kicked off his college club his stock only rises amongst the most bored.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
jterrell said:
He's worth a 5th rounder.

Nothing more.

If you spend a pick on this guy and bring him in he will already be behind all your other rookies and will have missed half your summer workouts. AND this is a guy who needs workouts and structure.

All that and he flatly was poor last season. He would not have been a day 1 prospect had he entered the draft which is why he did not. After getting kicked off his college club his stock only rises amongst the most bored.
I'll bet he goes higher than round 5.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Hostile said:
I'll bet he goes higher than round 5.

and as many have speculated on here, including me, that Oakland will probably be the culprit, Al loves athletes

still can't believe they used a 2nd on Stephen Routt(SP)
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
MarvinTurds.jpg

As it turns out, Marvin demonstrated at a young age an affinity for picking turds.

Gotta admire their propensity for subtlety and nuance.
 

Chief

"Friggin Joke Monkey"
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
4
InmanRoshi said:
Gotta admire their propensity for subtlety and nuance.


:muttley:

Photoshop and the Internet are a great recipe for comedy.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
Hostile said:
Roll the dice Jerry & Bill. Listen to Chris Canty. No guts, no glory.

No guts, no glory? Well, I say, without guts, you have no poo.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
AsthmaField said:
No guts, no glory? Well, I say, without guts, you have no poo.
A wise old cowboy once told me "that man is all gurgle and no guts."

We took a risk at WR, take one at ILB in a 3-4.
 
Top