your original claim: "Amari Cooper's stats before and after coming to Dallas. It's clear as day he got paid because he came to Dallas and was able to "elevate" his game playing with Dak. He wasn't doing it in Oakland with Carr." That was your original response to the Claim of "It's the opposite for Amari, he helped rejuvenate Dak's career when it was at a low point." when in reference to Pickens going to get rich because of Dak.
I've pointed out, that considering that Dak was getting national flack at the time for being on a downward trend, that Amari Cooper coming to Dallas rejuvenated Dak's career, which is fact given that Dak failed to elevate the receivers he had, a mid season trade had to be made to save the season, and the result were that Dak ended up having a respectable season instead of a failed season because of Amari Cooper making Dak look good again after a bad start to a season. you had said before and after when referring to Amari's stats but failed to provide the stats after he left the cowboys? Was that still oversight or bad faith? Amari had respectable stats before, during and after the cowboys, which is fact. Yes, his numbers went down in Oakland, but at the time before he came to the cowboys and after he helped in the turn around, there were sport analysts saying that the blame may have layed more on the hands of a badly run organization that the Raiders were. It is also true that at the time, many in the media were speculating that Dak was just a gimmick quarterback, something he deserves credit for overcoming, but also something that Amari coming to Dallas helped stop talk thereof. I think Amari could've found success on many other teams besides the Cowboys, but it is fact him coming to Dallas helped Rejuvenate Dak's career as supported by Daks stats with and without Amari playing.
