Prescott: Pickens must be re-signed

Did we win one last year? When we had Pickens,Lamb and Dak?

No team is going to win a Superbowl with a 32nd ranked defense. There isn't an offense in NFL history that could win with the defense we had, so Dak, Pickens and Lamb weren't the problem.
 
Listen yall are confusing me wanting a better D with hating on Pickens. I’ve been on this board saying he’s better than CeeDee at times. My issue is sinking that much money into a WR corp. Of course he was a good teammate…it was a contract year. See what happens when the guy is locked for 3-4 yrs. I’d rather have a team like the playoff ones who can play tough D and still create with thr weapons they have, last year looked “glossy” but it hit us 7 wins
Tagging him sinks $28 million against the cap in 2026. If it’s a cap issue, signing him is better than tagging him.
 
No team is going to win a Superbowl with a 32nd ranked defense. There isn't an offense in NFL history that could win with the defense we had, so Dak, Pickens and Lamb weren't the problem.
Thats the point ....... why spend more money on an offense that was not the problem or the solution?

We need to spend money on the defense ....... the highest paid QB in history does not need 2 number one receivers.
 
I agree we've seen teams do it....Eagles...I just don't think our guys know how to do it and then we look like we have most of the cap dedicated to a rootin, tootin, high scorin offense and people will say "Dak gets no D help." Don't trust Daddy or sons to get it done correctly.
yeah i don’t expect them too, just saying it’s doable. and the backlash from fans over daks contract gives them cover and the perfect built in excuse
 
Thats the point ....... why spend more money on an offense that was not the problem or the solution?

We need to spend money on the defense ....... the highest paid QB in history does not need 2 number one receivers.

While I agree with your point, I believe our biggest problem defensively was scheme and coaching.
 
So Mah is batteries now? Amazing.....

So when you said Dak - ("Mah stats" )im not sure what battery stats are.
It's okay, I got your intent, which is why I responded the way I did.

I know you need the attention though so I decided to entertain you.

Carry on with your agenda .. I'm sure there are some who will appreciate it.
 
Yup, I know, just taking a good natured shot at Dak, for being the highest paid player in the NFL and then pushing for us to spend more cap on offence.
I’m pretty sure his thinking is “this guy balled out last year and scored lots of touchdowns and makes crazy catches” and not “we need to spend more of the cap on offense”
 
Personally, if you didn't leave money on the table to spread to other "important pieces", don't comment on who needs to be signed, especially when we have a maxed player at said position.
 
But they are not going to ........ they have shown they are more interested in making money than making a winning team.

If we sign the second #1 wide receiver ........ other positions are gonna suffer ....... did you just start watching this team? Do you not know how the front office works?
Thats fair. I will hope for both, however unlikely. This entire off season grade for me will be based on "change." I don't want to hear their crap about cap constraints.
 
While I agree with your point, I believe our biggest problem defensively was scheme and coaching.
There is no scheme in the world that could help Murray The worst line backer in history. How about that sanborn. The whole defense was trash
 
But they are not going to ........ they have shown they are more interested in making money than making a winning team.

If we sign the second #1 wide receiver ........ other positions are gonna suffer ....... did you just start watching this team? Do you not know how the front office works?
This...
 
Back
Top