dogunwo
Franchise Tagged
- Messages
- 10,320
- Reaction score
- 5,700
Did Dak keep the ball?I took it as if Beasley was almost apologizing for not getting into the endzone for Daks 1st passing TD.........
Did Dak keep the ball?I took it as if Beasley was almost apologizing for not getting into the endzone for Daks 1st passing TD.........
Dak still isn't throwing the sorts of 25 yards down the middle throws that true elite quarterbacks make. But the thing is that we have an offensive line that doesn't hold and doesn't give up negative plays, at least against the bad teams we've played so far. With an offense like that, a guy who is really accurate in the 8-12 yard range is tremendously effective, because you're never having to go 3rd and 12. That's great for now. We'll see as we move on.
41 of 54 76% 540 yd 10.0 ypa 1 td 0 int 113.2
Schawing!!!!And two rushing TDs......
It looked like Beasley was ripping Dak for the under throw on the goal line pass.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Did Dak keep the ball?
To put with his other 59 silly.Why would Dez need that ball?
Why would Dez need that ball?
Here's the play:I took it as if Beasley was almost apologizing for not getting into the endzone for Daks 1st passing TD.........
Neither does Russell Wilson. Stop sounding like a back in the day old man. The job gets done either way.Dak still isn't throwing the sorts of 25 yards down the middle throws that true elite quarterbacks make. But the thing is that we have an offensive line that doesn't hold and doesn't give up negative plays, at least against the bad teams we've played so far. With an offense like that, a guy who is really accurate in the 8-12 yard range is tremendously effective, because you're never having to go 3rd and 12. That's great for now. We'll see as we move on.
I think Beasley was upset he didnt score, and was pointing to Dak that he would get it next time. that's how i took it.Here's the play:
http://www.nfl.com/videos/dallas-co...tt-comes-1-yard-short-of-first-career-TD-pass
It's open to interpretation since we can't hear what Beas is saying, but my guess is that he's fired up for the throw and catch that they just made happen. I took Beas pointing to Dak as saying "damn that was a hell of a throw, you are the man" or something along those lines. And also maybe a little bit of, "Damn I wish I could've gotten in for you." I could be wrong.
Edit: Damn, that throw was a beauty!
On the second score of Dallas, the field goal, Dak put it right on the money for Butler which was a clear PI on the Bears DB.
He probably should have had another TD on that drive.. He was absolutely killing the Bears in the first half.
Would love for Garrett to incorporate some of the Qb friendly things Wentz gets to use...
did I miss something?
Really impressive.41 of 54 76% 540 yd 10.0 ypa 1 td 0 int 113.2
The offense is too talented to take anything away. If you keen in on Beasley (LOL), we will beat you with Dez or T-Will. This offense is running beautiful under Dak, and it's reminiscent of our 2014 offense.Dak played very well today, but Ive been saying it for several weeks now and I think most people are blinded by the 3 fairly good (all in all) performances from Dak thus far - the coaching staff is putting him in the best possible place to succeed. Plays designed for his strengths, not running the whole offense...if you've noticed, its all been short stuff. Not a lot of deep shots or intermediate throws that require more timing down the field. I feel like once defenses really start trying to take away the Dak n Dunk as one poster put it, we'll start to see some of those rookie warts.
No rookie QB is going to keep this up (or what Wentz is doing, for that matter). Even the great ones struggle.
I still think that when Romo is ready to come back, he'll come back as the starter. Dak would have to be having the greatest rookie QB season in NFL history to match typical Romo output.