bounce;5095467 said:Not a Mavs fan, but absolutely not. The major part of his career and accolades was as a New Jersey Net or a Phoenix Sun.
DFWJC;5095485 said:I think evenutally, they will consider it.
Kidd considers himself a Mav, the Mavs drafted him, and he won his (and the Mavs') only title in Dallas.
But he did go back on his word with Cuban when he bolted last year. Until then, I would have said it's a lock. Eventually, the two will patch things up (they've always gotten along great) and Cuban will consider letting Kidd retire his number in Dallas.
The other way around.ABQCOWBOY;5095492 said:Yeah, but I thought that the speculation was that Kidd went back on his word because of the interview Cuban had where he said he would not hang Kidd's Jersey?
Maybe I'm missing some pieces here.
TheCowboy;5095491 said:When he left Dallas for New York I don't think he deserves it. Plus most of his career was in New Jersey.
That's right.ABQCOWBOY;5095496 said:Why do I keep hearing this? He was in Dallas longer then he was in New Jersey.
LOL my bad didn't read the other posts. Still nonetheless I don't think his number should be retired.ABQCOWBOY;5095496 said:Why do I keep hearing this? He was in Dallas longer then he was in New Jersey.
DFWJC;5095493 said:The other way around.
Cuban said he wouldn't hang his Jersey because he was so upset that Kidd went back on his word.
:laugh2: I can see by a couple of your comments that you aren't much of a fan of Cuban as an owner?ABQCOWBOY;5095502 said:Auhh.... OK. Well, I wonder if Cuban will reconsider now that Kidd has retired? He would probably be the 1st Maverick player in the HOF. Cuban would look pretty stupid if he didn't have him retired and the guy was the only player in the Hall.
DFWJC;5095507 said::laugh2: I can see by a couple of your comments that you aren't much of a fan of Cuban as an owner?
Anyway. It'll happen.
Because he went back on his word, I suspect he will have to wait a very short time. But Kidd already is buttering his bread--as he said today he thought Cuban was one of, if not the, best owner in all of sports.
Then Dirk will be up there too and also in the HOF.
Fair enough.ABQCOWBOY;5095512 said:No, I think you would definitely be wide of the mark there. I don't love the guy, he has done some bone head things over the years but I don't hate him either. For the most part, he's pretty straight up in his opinions, right or wrong, so I can respect that from him.
It's not a personal thing for me. He is what he is.
ABQCOWBOY;5095477 said:Actually, and I could be wrong, the Mav's were the team he spent the longest with. 8 Seasons? He was drafted by the Mavs and his only championship was with the Mavs so I don't know that I agree with you there. However, it's really none of my business because I'm not a Mav's fan.
bounce;5095540 said:I didn't say he wasn't with Dallas the longest of any one team, I just mean that Jason Kidd's accomplishments as a Net or a Sun will be far more remembered than anything he did as a Mav. Championship with Dallas aside, the 12 year span in-between Dallas stints were what made Jason Kidd great. He was with Dallas longer than any one team, but he accomplished more individually, and built his HOF resume, in other uniforms.
joseephuss;5095563 said:For example, he made 2 All-star games as a Maverick while going to 3 as a Sun and 5 with the Nets.
ABQCOWBOY;5095570 said:On the other hand, he won 1 NBA championship as a Mav while winning zero as a Sun or a Net.
I think it's all in how you measure accomplishments. I would not have a problem with anybody who said his career was at it's height while playing for other teams but I can also see where a person can make an argument to say that his career reached it's zenith, while playing in Dallas and winning his only championship.