News: Randle drug charges dropped; Ex-gf granted protection order

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,857
Protection from abuse order granted. Cut. Him. Now.

She was granted one without hearing from the accused pending a hearing to determine whether the case has merit.

I am fine with erring on the side of caution with such an injunction but the court will determine whether her case is valid.
 

MrPeanutbutter

What is this, a crossover episode?
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
3,099
In most jurisdictions, I could get the same order based on a statement, your name and address. Fair??

This is a stupid argument. I think he's gone. If he's indicted on domestic violence charges or assault with a deadly weapon, it's adios, but until then, there are bigger issues related to the Dallas Cowboys.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,857
This is a stupid argument. I think he's gone. If he's indicted on domestic violence charges or assault with a deadly weapon, it's adios, but until then, there are bigger issues related to the Dallas Cowboys.

They found no weapon. Good luck on the indictment.
 

MrPeanutbutter

What is this, a crossover episode?
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
3,099
They found no weapon. Good luck on the indictment.

We're all legal experts now. All I know is threatening is assault and a gun is a deadly weapon. I also know that if you go on trial for something like that, your employer is going to fire you weather or not you are found guilty.
 

DeaconBlues

M'Kevon
Messages
4,374
Reaction score
1,585
Protection from abuse order granted. Cut. Him. Now.

In most jurisdictions, I could get the same order based on a statement, your name and address. Fair??
This is a stupid argument. I think he's gone. If he's indicted on domestic violence charges or assault with a deadly weapon, it's adios, but until then, there are bigger issues related to the Dallas Cowboys.

Your entire argument hinges on the word "if".
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,857
They have eye witnesses

Sure do and as with the other charge that was dropped, the stories were “inconsistent stories, statements from individuals out there.”

http://crimeblog.***BANNED-URL***/2...-order-against-the-cowboys-running-back.html/

It's he said she said and there is no physical evidence. GL with that.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,857
We're all legal experts now. All I know is threatening is assault and a gun is a deadly weapon. I also know that if you go on trial for something like that, your employer is going to fire you weather or not you are found guilty.

I never claimed to be a legal expert. You sound petulant.

If there is no weapon and it's only a contested testimony as proof then GL with getting that to stick.
 

dillinger319

Striped Leopard
Messages
910
Reaction score
97
The Cowboys cannot cut him due to "these " circumstances without the league potentially filing a suit against the Cowboys or NFL. It's a shame but there is zero evidence against Randle. Only hearsay. (which could be dangerous)
 
Top