Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
We talking about the same woman? How old is she?jobberone;2810290 said:She's too old for you, dude.
We talking about the same woman? How old is she?jobberone;2810290 said:She's too old for you, dude.
Hostile;2810325 said:We talking about the same woman? How old is she?
DaBoys4Life;2809897 said:I don't buy that one man can ruin the chemistry of a team of 52 other grown men but whatever.
Idgit;2809949 said:SLATE, if this board were a team, who do you think the Greg Ellises would be? To stick with the analogy here, we're looking for posters whose whininess is excessive considering the circumstances.
jobberone;2810354 said:I googled her and thought she looked in her 40s. You need a young chick. Besides you have a woman. OTOH, you ain't dead yet either.
How old is she and put her pic up will you?
Boyzmamacita;2810435 said:
She was born 12/06/62, so she's 46 at the moment.
SLATEmosphere;2810444 said:Wow what a
Hoofbite;2809703 said:What a coincidence. Get rid of the **** and the locker room no longer smells.
igtmfo;2809692 said:Makes me think the team was really a mess last year. Was it just Mr. Owens to blame? Sounds like it was a more widespread deal.
SultanOfSix;2810567 said:I didn't read this whole thread, but you guys do realize that there were more than just supposedly one person, i.e. the media's favorite target, affecting team chemistry in the locker room last year? Since Rat said some positive things about Owens, and mentioned that he was a scapegoat, it would make me believe that it was the others that were affecting team chemistry in a bad way more so than Owens.
SultanOfSix;2810567 said:I didn't read this whole thread, but you guys do realize that there were more than just supposedly one person, i.e. the media's favorite target, affecting team chemistry in the locker room last year? Since Rat said some positive things about Owens, and mentioned that he was a scapegoat, it would make me believe that it was the others that were affecting team chemistry in a bad way more so than Owens.
RCowboyFan;2810576 said:Nope, not entirely true. Yes there were others, as mentioned in this thread like Tank and Pacman primarily (which makes the whole Jerry wanting Pac back such an moronic statement by him, IMO). But Randy Galloway, mentioned on his show, that several players behind the scenes, although making public statements about TO being a good guy, told the management, not to pay attention to their statements. I.e. they just wanted to make sure they are good side of TO publicly. Which really reveals how much he had taken over the lockeroom, IMO.
Say whatever you want about Randy, his sources are rock sollid, when he reports based on sources, at least 90% of the time, since I have been listening to him on Radio for 5 years. His opinions are different matter though
Even the coaches were releaved by TO departure apparently. Hence there is more "Strictness" with coaches in off season and more demanding of players.
Jerry and players can keep playing public service to TO, but there is reason for TO being out of there. Its not because of tryhing to get young players more playing time as Jerry keeps trying to convince media.
Hostile;2809785 said:Call me crazy but I think stuff like the being had by Tulius is infectious to a locker room. If guys start genuinely liking each other we will become a better team. I know of one player who despised Owens last year. I know of more than one who are elated he is gone.
Chemistry does matter.
igtmfo;2809847 said:I bet Tank was no prize in the room either ...
I remember his quote after the Eagles game, when he reminded his teammates: "I'm a free agent, baby" to everyone who could hear him.
RoadRunner;2809982 said:Until you actually cite sources and name names its just all hearsay. It doesn't hold up in debate or a courtroom.
I could also claim that I know several players that are upset Owens is gone. I could also claim there is at least one player who despises Romo.
Obviously you have nothing to back you up.SLATEmosphere;2809718 said:Sure.
If your beef is with Ellis making his issue public, then I get it. What I dont get is how so many people have a problem with an individual trying to maximize his own income. Everyone here would do the exact same thing. No, he isnt starving, but why not make as much money as he can during his career so it is a non issue afterwards? What is so wrong with that?Angus;2810165 said:Which of those 31 teams elected to trade for him when the opportunity was offered?
Which of them has swooped in to make him a member of their team now that he can be had for free?
Greg Ellis is not a bad person and he did help some rookies, but he was a bad influence because his emphasis the last few years has been on 'me' and the 'bad front office treating me like this'. The only thing he was interested in was money and how he could make more of it. He knew airing his grievances couldn't help the team, but only hurt it.
A lot of us are that way, but our particular selfishness doesn't adversely impact chances for football championships. His did, IMO.
SLATEmosphere;2810424 said:DaBoys..ILoveMeSomeMe...JVita..Just to name a few.