Well, I didn't know it was possible but the Cowboys future is more bleaker than ever. How many years will Jerry waste on his pet clown project??
However long Romo plays.
Sad that Romo has been saddled with Wade & Garrett throughout most of his tenure as a starter. We were extremely lucky to get a QB as good as Romo especially the way got him. His talent will end up being wasted on piss poor head coaches.
you are way over evaluating this. I don't garrett is that smart to pull strings like he is. a lot goes to Jerry the GM. for example the Callahan to OC was purely a Jerry move, Garrett opposed it and its well written about last year with a final meeting in Jerry's airplane....which later didn't work out and garrett took over and brushed it as an organizational change to make things more efficient (to satisfy the media pundits). now, jerry doesn't want to admit so he is leaving Callahan with his title, reduced responsibility. Linehan is a garrett recommended hire, because of their past relationship and as much as garrett may have wanted to give him title of OC, with Callahan there, he couldn't. Jerry is the cause of a lot of this mess.
Houck was also a jerry move, because he signed a bunch of crap told houck to make them into great football players and when he couldn't he assumed its the coaches fault for not turning his shiit to filet mignon. so he brough Callahan in to fix it and that's where Callahan succeeded and should have stayed. when he focused back on the OL, our running game got much better as opposed to when he was the OC.
All new coaches
I agree with you mostly. Garrett has been learning as he goes on Romo's time which sucks. The one thing I feel Romo should have adjusted to is his showing up to camp carrying more pounds than he should. I sense that his disk issue is weight affected and I believe he needs to shed a few as he ages.
This is just the eyeball test for me and easily could be wrong. I would just feel better seeing him lose a few to help his back. Otherwise, I am with you.
As a person who has had two different ruptured disc that required surgery to repair, I do not believe that weight has a whole lot to do with it. With my first ruptured disc, I was running 3 - 5 miles several times a week. I was in terrific shape and very trim yet I started having back problems. My second back issue, different disc seven years later, I weighed more than I did but was not overweight. My back problems can be traced back to the first real job I had which required a lot of lifting. I did not have any issues while doing the lifting at the time but the repetitive motion ended causing problems that manifested themselves years later. I can see where an extremely obese person could have back problems just carrying their own weight around but Romo is not nor ever has been obese.
BTW- my history with back problems makes me extremely skeptical Romo can return 100%. I can say from experience, I am not near the man I used to be before back problems and I do not get hit by 300 lbs. men for a living. Some people return 100% from back surgeries however I think they are the exception not the rule. I really hope Romo is an exception.
I feel for you bro. I had a herniated disk myself and know too much about these as well. I don't suggest Romo is too heavy personally, just that as he ages in nfl years, and continues to rely on his escapability, his weight and flex. Will need to change a little.
Love the guy. I think we are lucky to have him. I want him doing everything he can to carry this team and he has too. He goes down early and we are staring at a very high pick.
In 2013, the Cowboys ranked:
5th in offensive scoring
26th in defensive scoring
32nd in overall defense
That's the telling stat. What I do expect to see more of in 2014 is running the ball on 3rd and 1. I expect to see smart clockmanship. With all these great coaching hires Garrett needs to make sure that the Game is Managed. That is his only concern now.
I will keep my fingers crossed that Garrett finally figures out how to manage the clock and game but I have serious doubts. I would love nothing more for Garrett to make me look bad for all the complaining I do about him. I will proudly eat a large helping of crow if he finally figures it out!
Your stories trip me up. So Linehan is a Garrett hire, because of the past relationship and Houck isn't, when Houck was coaching in Miami with Garrett in the same offense that Garrett is essentially running now with the Cowboys, just a crappier version.
Not only that Houck runs a power-blocking scheme. And Callahan brought in the zone-blocking scheme, so whose idea was that? You know essentially he best part of the Cowboys improvement on offense.
houck was also a Jerry/Garrett hire. Houck was here before garrett with a the previous regimes and had relationships with Jerry.... however, letting houck go (yeah retired!!), was a jerry move because he couldn't turn shiet into filet mignon for jerry.
Garrett is getting pushed farther and farther away from the offense and made to wander the sidelines with no real job.
So a Garrett hire, right? You do realize that the reason they brought in Linehan was because they don't want to change the whole passing offense, cause Callahan is a West Coast guy. And they only did that once Linehan was scrapped from Detroit, otherwise Callahan was going to retain play-calling duties.
But they also they don't want to have a set back in the OL and running attack which is why Jerry didn't let Callahan interview in Baltimore. Either way , they have totally scrapped Garrett as a play-caller cause he sucks. And Callahan still remains and Garrett is getting pushed farther and farther away from the offense and made to wander the sidelines with no real job.
There are usually around 5 or 6 new head coaches every year, and then you have to figure there are another 5 or 6 who are on the hot seat for the next year. Most coaches get at least 3 years, so basically you have 15-18 coaches who are basically rotated in and out over the course of three years. That's at least half the NFL. The other half of the coaches in the league are usually accomplishing something...
Garrett somehow has managed to come out of that unscathed despite not accomplishing ANYTHING...
so you came to that conclusion all by yourself? so why is jerry keeping garrett around then? garrett is not part of defense. garrett is not part of offense. but conspiracy theorists say he was the reason wade was fired and that he is manipulating Jerry. yet you say exactly the opposite. could we get the two groups to chat and get back to the rest of us!!!!
Maybe because Jason is Jerry's golden boy of proving the doubters wrong. So tell me why are you arguing that Jerry is hamstringing Garrett, despite keeping him around? So now your not blaming Jerry for Garrett's failures and he's keeping him because he thinks he's brilliant? Got to love the Garrett homerism and their lack of consistency.