Richard - I think he's why we don't draft safeties

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,747
Reaction score
20,826
I like Richard's philosophy for the secondary. SS in the box, CBs playing press and underneath, FS protecting all over the top.

This strategy calls for and *allows* bigger, stronger, longer, but maybe not so fast, at all DB positions but FS. That's also *cheaper* at all positions but FS.

If an Earl Thomas comes along for FS, we might try for him. We did, in fact. But I doubt any of the safeties at 58 and beyond were supposed to be Earl.

Looking at the guys we took, I see size and *long arms*, and guys we didn't have to spend premium picks on.
CB - Mike Jackson - 6-1 32 1/2
SS - Donovan Wilson - 6-0 33 3/8
CB - Mike Westry - 6-4 33 3/4

Everything is going exactly as planned. Teams thinking we were going to pick a safety high served our interests.

But not taking strong safeties or CBs early is a feature and benefit of a Richard secondary. Get used to it.

EDIT: I would change the title to "Richard - Not picking SSs or CBs early is a feature, not a bug"
 

gmoney112

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,589
Reaction score
15,694
We never really drafted safeties.

I believe during the draft Richards actually said something about the Hill/safety debate. Something along the lines of he can't make a safety pressure the QB into bad decisions.

He'd probably like a talented safety to pair with Woods, he just wanted a pressure player more, and in this case interior pressure. Because ours wasn't very good. I don't know if that's Hill, but I agree with him.
 

85Cowboy85

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,519
Reaction score
1,664
I've gotten the sense we value free safeties who have the athleticism to play single high. That's why they were in on Earl Thomas and that's why they drafted Byron Jones over Landon Collins.

I don't think we place much value on strong in the box type safeties. Much like the 3 tech vs the 1 tech. They will take players like that but only in the late rounds of the draft or as low tier free agent signings.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,510
Reaction score
31,877
I'm done trying to guess why they do what they do

I'm done trying to justify it

If you are going against the traditional model, show me the results or get lost

That's my mantra for this year

Show me Garrett, Moore, Marinelli and Richard

Or get lost
 

CT Dal Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,516
Reaction score
20,386
The bottom line is the Cowboys like what they have at safety more than we do.

The playoff loss to the Rams was due to getting beat badly along both the defensive and offensive lines. Dallas addressed those spots with their first two picks; so I guess there's not much to debate after all.
 

Hennessy_King

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,623
Reaction score
25,418
This is really simple - your entire secondary gets better when you put more pressure on the quarterback. The coaches believe in focusing on the defensive line.
This is not 100% true especially with our bend dont break style defense. We play off and keep everything in front of us. Mediocre secondary play allows QBs to get rid of the ball faster due to our trash scheme of playing off and not being aggressive. It's actually counterintuitive
 

TheSkaven

Last Man Standing
Messages
7,021
Reaction score
5,775
This is not 100% true especially with our bend dont break style defense. We play off and keep everything in front of us. Mediocre secondary play allows QBs to get rid of the ball faster due to our trash scheme of playing off and not being aggressive. It's actually counterintuitive

That changed with Richard. I don’t have the official stats in front of me - but I’m certain that we blitzed a lot more in 2018 than in 2017. They played more aggressive, played closer to the line and took more chances, played more man than ever before. Let’s see if the trend continues.
 

Maxmadden

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,143
Reaction score
4,369
This is not 100% true especially with our bend dont break style defense. We play off and keep everything in front of us. Mediocre secondary play allows QBs to get rid of the ball faster due to our trash scheme of playing off and not being aggressive. It's actually counterintuitive
That's why we took an interior DL to get more pressure up the middle.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,747
Reaction score
20,826
I've gotten the sense we value free safeties who have the athleticism to play single high. That's why they were in on Earl Thomas and that's why they drafted Byron Jones over Landon Collins.

I don't think we place much value on strong in the box type safeties. Much like the 3 tech vs the 1 tech. They will take players like that but only in the late rounds of the draft or as low tier free agent signings.

That's about how I see it.

They'll spend to get a true single high FS. For in the box guys, they think they can get them cheaper. And they're right. Barry Church cost nothing to draft and little to extend, although I thought we were paying too much at the end.

Frazier just didn't pan out for us.
 

Hennessy_King

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,623
Reaction score
25,418
That changed with Richard. I don’t have the official stats in front of me - but I’m certain that we blitzed a lot more in 2018 than in 2017. They played more aggressive, played closer to the line and took more chances, played more man than ever before. Let’s see if the trend continues.
When marinelli is not the DC with his trash scheme then there might be a difference.
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,747
Reaction score
20,826
That being said, it has been reported that at pick 90, they would have taken SS Will Harris if he was there. So they were willing to take certain guys that fit.

I'm surprised at that one. Doesn't have the long arms of the other guys.
 
Top