JPM
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,301
- Reaction score
- 1,236
Look closer it's actually 2 pancakes.iceberg;2644516 said:where's a rabbit with a pancake on it's head when you need one?
Look closer it's actually 2 pancakes.iceberg;2644516 said:where's a rabbit with a pancake on it's head when you need one?
bbgun;2644411 said:Someone changed the thread title. Now my joke makes no sense.
Doomsay;2644931 said:There probably would be a drop-off in pass production w/o TO, but hopefully our rushing yardage would increase without him. Without TO, we'd need somebody to stretch the field - maybe that's Austin.
Good thing is that this strategy would likely result in fewer turnovers and our completion rate and TOP would go up.
zrinkill;2644867 said:You know this how?
YoMick;2645311 said:Romo can be good to very good.
Manning is upper eschelon. Elite.
Doomsday101;2645323 said:Romo has only been starting 2.5 years Manning was not winning playoff games during his 1st 3 season and the numbers are pretty much the same.
YoMick;2645327 said:Well. We werent talking playoff games.
What I said was... Romo doesnt touch those stats without TO whereas Peyton could with lesser WR's.
windward;2644589 said:Terrell Owens implying Jeff Garcia is gay? All due to Tony Romo's lack of leadership skills.
It all makes sense now.
well, by all accounts... YEAH!!! Try to keep up.tyke1doe;2644716 said:So football is going to stop when TO leaves?