Romo or Aikman 1995?

[mmillman]

Aikman had a stronger arm, was bigger, protected the ball, was a better leader, and was one of the most accurate passers in history.

Romo moves better and that is about it.

 

[Tusan_Homichi]

Romo will never, ever be even 1/4th of the QB that Aikman was. The OP should have his fan-card pulled for even creating this thread.

Now I think we're going a bit too far...

 

[The Quest for Six]

On this team (2009) with this coaching staff, who would put up more wins?

Romo of today or Aikman of 1995.

Replace Aikman's name with Danny White in your question, then you might have a credible question, otherwise, having Romo even in the same sentence as Aikman is ridiculous.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

A great part of Aikmans' game was decision making. Romo doesnt have that..... yet........ (I hope he gets it).

Anyone debating Romo/Aikman doesnt really know football. An accomplished 3 time champion, most wins of the 90's vs. a guy who has choked and hasnt won a playoff game.

Ya... no brainer.