Romo Question?

[TEK2000]

Well that sorta screws up the whole one half vs. the other half. Because he sucked in the Giants game (2nd one) which you included in the first "half" of his season.

66.8 plays per game first 5 games (Carolina to Tampa Bay)
153 pass attempts
45.8% passes


55.4 plays per game the first 5 games (Giants to Detroit)
157 pass attempts
56.7% passes

Ok.. there ya go. Half and Half and they are still pretty much exactly what I said. What else do you have a problem with now?

 

[dargonking999]

5stars, no offense but you really can't talk abuot anyone's age, and how there acting, because well, your acting like a 12 year old kid. You should really lay off.

 

[dargonking999]

66.8 plays per game first 5 games (Carolina to Tampa Bay)[FONT=arial,verdana]Fan Zone Forum[/FONT]
153 pass attempts
45.8% passes


55.4 plays per game the first 5 games (Giants to Detroit)
157 pass attempts
56.7% passes

Ok.. there ya go. Half and Half and they are still pretty much exactly what I said. What else do you have a problem with now?

Your hair

 

[gbrittain]

I do not buy the game tape theory, other wise would it not be pretty common place for first time starting QBs to put up the kind of numbers Romo did last season?

Why didn't Jason Campbell put up Romo like numbers?

I do not know 100% that Romo is the answer or not, but I like the early returns.

I guess we call all rest easier if Romo would have put up an impressive 76.5 rating.

 

[superpunk]

His first 6 games, he had 180 attempts and the last 5, 157. That averages out to 30 attempts a game the first 6, and 31.4 the last 5. The stats don't bear out the Boys put the games on his shoulders, because surely his attempts would go up a lot more. *edited* For clarity purposes, it doesn't show that the Boys put the game on Romo's shoulders moreso in the latter half then in the first half.

initial point. firehak only uses the games Romo played in.

First six games Romo's passes accounted for 45.8 % of the offensive plays.
Last 5 games Romo's passes accounted for 57.1 % of the offensive plays.

refuted.

How about the first 5? Because you gotta disclude that game because he can't have passed for even 50% of that game. I bet his number is closer to 50% for the first 5 games he started. I don't feel like looking it up, but that game where he had to have closer to 30-35% of the offensive plays probably skews the stats a bit.

Besides, I think that's about average (57%). I'll have to look it up, but that can't be too terribly uncommon, where you have to pass a bit more then half of the time.

firehawk now decides it's not about whether we asked Romo to do more in one half versus the other - it's about the league average.

This has been a lesson in how NOT to construct an argument. Brought to you by the colors burgundy and gold.

 

[5Stars]

5stars, no offense but you really can't talk abuot anyone's age, and how there acting, because well, your acting like a 12 year old kid. You should really lay off.

Thanks for the info...young man. But, I like to come down to the level of a troll...it makes me feel young again!

Oh, and have you tried to "lay on"?

:laugh2:

 

[dargonking999]

Thanks for the info...young man. But, I like to come down to the level of a troll...it makes me feel young again!

Oh, and have you tried to "lay on"?

:laugh2:

No

i'd rather just get laid

 

[5Stars]

No

i'd rather just get laid

That's what I was insinuating...




Then go find a female...unless your....nevermind!

 

[dargonking999]

That's what I was insinuating...




Then go find a female...unless your....nevermind!

You failed at spelling that word, as well as correctly using it. But of course, i feel like being a prick today so its a wash.

And i like it right where im at thank you very much.

 

[5Stars]

You failed at spelling that word, as well as correctly using it. But of course, i feel like being a prick today so its a wash.

And i like it right where im at thank you very much.

Your telling me how to spell? :laugh2:

Come on, friend, don't go all Phoenix-Talon on me now!

 

[redskins1]

So, you are 44 years old, huh?

:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: Did you mean to type 14 years old or 24 maybe?

You like facts, old man? Try this fact!

5 -11 baby! Tuck that into your 44 year old brain...


:laugh2: (yeah right)...If you really are 44 years old (which I will ask your brother)...then you missed out on alot of school!

make fun of the spelling all you want to..when on a msg board folks are not concern about proper grammer..just pay attention to what is being said..folks who look for grammer dont like to look for the truth,its there way out..you found yours!!!

 

[03EBZ06]

make fun of the spelling all you want to..when on a msg board folks are not concern about proper grammer..just pay attention to what is being said..folks who look for grammer dont like to look for the truth,its there way out..you found yours!!!

Grammar, grammar...sorry, had to do it.

 

[5Stars]

make fun of the spelling all you want to..when on a msg board folks are not concern about proper grammer..just pay attention to what is being said..folks who look for grammer dont like to look for the truth,its there way out..you found yours!!!

I'm really not making fun of how you spell...(darking98453 or whateve his name is will do that)...I'm just hasseling you for your thoughts and comments...because they do not seem like something that somebody your age would do or say...but, then again, you are a RedStink fan...so...?


:laugh2:

 

[redskins1]

Grammar, grammar...sorry, had to do it.

point made!!

 

[Clove]

I'm actually beginning to wonder about Parcells offensive philosophy, in that when Bledsoe was in there, we couldn't move the ball well. I'm wondering if Romo just flat out bought more time to throw the ball, sending receivers too deep, not enough play making in the short game ie(running backs) not enough successful screens.

I think Peyton could've done wonders with Romo's game, and if we had a running back who could catch a freaking short dump off and get 12 yds a shot, Romo's numbers could be very impressive coming down the stretch.

This is why I'm hoping Garrett brings a touch of creativeness to the offense.

We need running backs getting nice chunks of yardage. We need Rb catching balls, we need way more protection that what either Bledsoe or Romo received. Remember, Bledsoe had a ton of pressure, that pressure doesn't get better cause a new QB's in there.

 

[dargonking999]

Your telling me how to spell? :laugh2:

Come on, friend, don't go all Phoenix-Talon on me now!

Now you're comparing me to a eagle fan?

Of all the people on this board you compare me to an eagle fan?

You seriously need to work on your insults. They need a Michael Jackson face lift

 

[5Stars]

Now you're comparing me to a eagle fan?

Of all the people on this board you compare me to an eagle fan?

You seriously need to work on your insults. They need a Michael Jackson face lift

Michael Jackson, or Jerry Jones facelift? Decisions, decisions...look it up or don't look it up?

I apologize, my good friend...comparing you to PT was a low blow!

 

[dargonking999]

Michael Jackson, or Jerry Jones facelift? Decisions, decisions...look it up or don't look it up?

I apologize, my good friend...comparing you to PT was a low blow!

When i make a really long, boring thread, thats filled with big words trying to show of my intelligence, only to make myself look like a really ignorant bafoon, about the eagles and cowboys, asking for the "real cowboy" fans to give me their opinions

THEN you can compare me to PT.

Kthx

 

[TEK2000]

I'm actually beginning to wonder about Parcells offensive philosophy, in that when Bledsoe was in there, we couldn't move the ball well. I'm wondering if Romo just flat out bought more time to throw the ball, sending receivers too deep, not enough play making in the short game ie(running backs) not enough successful screens.

I think Peyton could've done wonders with Romo's game, and if we had a running back who could catch a freaking short dump off and get 12 yds a shot, Romo's numbers could be very impressive coming down the stretch.

This is why I'm hoping Garrett brings a touch of creativeness to the offense.

We need running backs getting nice chunks of yardage. We need Rb catching balls, we need way more protection that what either Bledsoe or Romo received. Remember, Bledsoe had a ton of pressure, that pressure doesn't get better cause a new QB's in there.

My impression just from watching the games was that the OLinemen seemed more enthused and fired up when Romo was in there versus when Bledsoe was in there. The body language was very different. If Bledsoe was having a rough game, their body language just gave me the impression of them being frustrated, uninspired, and indifferent. When Romo was in there, they seemed fired up, enthusiastic, inspired, and more dedicated to doing their jobs.

As with many of the rest of the offensive players, they just seemed more into the game and like they "believed" they could do well when Romo was in there.

Like I say, just my impression from watching the games.

 

[5Stars]

My impression just from watching the games was that the OLinemen seemed more enthused and fired up when Romo was in there versus when Bledsoe was in there. The body language was very different. If Bledsoe was having a rough game, their body language just gave me the impression of them being frustrated, uninspired, and indifferent. When Romo was in there, they seemed fired up, enthusiastic, inspired, and more dedicated to doing their jobs.

As with many of the rest of the offensive players, they just seemed more into the game and like they "believed" they could do well when Romo was in there.

Like I say, just my impression from watching the games.

Interesting...that's what I thought also...

Bledsoe held the ball way too long, and the big boys got tired trying to hold the line...that would tire them out and that's why I think the team tanked at the end of the season.

When Romo came in...he got rid of the ball faster...