Romo versus Bledsoe

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Bledsoe I'd say is a lock to start. But Romo has an opening if he can light it up in preseason games. Say he has a few 15-19 200 yard games and moves the ball and scores points.

Does Parcells start him if Bledsoe is so/so?
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
No. But I like Romo better than Henson right now. However either one can have ups and downs which is expected with young QBs.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,956
Reaction score
8,173
Yes, because he has "moxie", has started more than 8 games since high school, is excellent at golf, and last but not least, he's not Drew Henson.
 

TheEnigma

Anomaly
Messages
1,055
Reaction score
180
SultanOfSix said:
Yes, because he has "moxie", has started more than 8 games since high school, is excellent at golf, and last but not least, he's not Drew Henson.

What does that have to do with him starting over Bledsoe?
 

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Nors, your not so subtle point that Henson has been eliminated from the competition did not go unnoticed.

But it will go uncommented on.

That Tony is capable of 'pushing' Drew Bledsoe is ludicrous. No matter how many camp fodder types he may light up in preseason.

Give the kid a break.

His competition is not with #11, it is with himself... and the guy on Tuna's speed dial.
 

Little Jr

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
2,337
I don't think Romo starts this year unless something happens to Bledsoe and we dont bring in a vet. But I think he will have a shot in 2006 to start.
 

ratpower

New Member
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
LaTunaNostra said:
Nors, your not so subtle point that Henson has been eliminated from the competition did not go unnoticed.

But it will go uncommented on.

That Tony is capable of 'pushing' Drew Bledsoe is ludicrous. No matter how many camp fodder types he may light up in preseason.

Give the kid a break.

His competition is not with #11, it is with himself... and the guy on Tuna's speed dial.

This sums it up, if Romo is an all pro in pre-season, he gets #2, that's it. I like the speed dial comment cuzz it's true...:starspin
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,291
Reaction score
63,974
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Nors said:
Bledsoe I'd say is a lock to start. But Romo has an opening if he can light it up in preseason games. Say he has a few 15-19 200 yard games and moves the ball and scores points.

Does Parcells start him if Bledsoe is so/so?
Being the Patriots fan that you are (just kidding, Nors :)), you fully know that it took a Mo Lewis hit to knock Bledsoe out of the starting slot for Belichick to replace him with Tom Brady. And that was during a 0-2 start for New England. Only a similar occurrence here will result in Bledsoe being benched this season.
 

scottsp

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,936
Reaction score
941
Bledsoe starts unless he goes down before the season begins, no matter how badly he might play in exhibition games. Hence, there really is no "versus."

As for Tony Romo, nothing has been settled with the number two spot. Has the important phase of evaluation really even begun? I would believe game action would be an important part of the equation.

Bill Parcells loves to point out how one can never really know about a player until "he is under duress."

I do not believe we have anything like that to go by at this point.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,439
Reaction score
6,850
I could be wrong but I think Nors was commenting on the fact that Romo went for a touchdown in the scrimmage yesterday with the second team offense against the starting defense and Bledsoe got a field goal with the starting offense against the starting defense.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
From all I've read Romo has distanced himself from Henson and most prepared to run an NFL Offense. Now that said - could he take over for Bledsoe? On Henson, he is relegated to #3 and thats my opinion. The battle is really Romo and that guy on speed dial. If its VT I will officially bash Parcells. That would set this team so far back emotionally.

Romo is subtly on the spot as I read into the dynamics. Henson is going nowhere and will also not be #2. Its up to Romo to win backup job. That said Romo can go from #2 to cut if he fails in next week to 10 days.......

I'm pulling for the kid. And who's on speed dial?
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Nors said:
From all I've read Romo has distanced himself from Henson and most prepared to run an NFL Offense. Now that said - could he take over for Bledsoe? On Henson, he is relegated to #3 and thats my opinion. The battle is really Romo and that guy on speed dial. If its VT I will officially bash Parcells. That would set this team so far back emotionally.

Romo is subtly on the spot as I read into the dynamics. Henson is going nowhere and will also not be #2. Its up to Romo to win backup job. That said Romo can go from #2 to cut if he fails in next week to 10 days.......

I'm pulling for the kid. And who's on speed dial?

where have you read anything about Romo distancing himself from anyone? I
I'm real curious, because I'd like to see it

I read his stats from last night but also read he was very underwhelming...he had one ball picked clean and two others that should have been picked...his td was a dink pass to a RB that ran the 15-20 yds to the endzone on his own

I also listened to Nick Eatman yesterday suggest if an outside QB is brought in to backup Bledsoe that Romo will probably be shown the door, and not Henson

that said, as I said in another thread I think Henson may have arm troubles and could end up on IR...you dont go from throwing the way he was to whats being reported now w/o something going on physically

David
 

NorTex

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
364
Ah, selective memory...Romo threw three balls that should have been intercepted (one was)...Bledsoe threw a great throw to Witten, that was dropped in the end zone.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
Nors said:
From all I've read Romo has distanced himself from Henson and most prepared to run an NFL Offense. Now that said - could he take over for Bledsoe? On Henson, he is relegated to #3 and thats my opinion. The battle is really Romo and that guy on speed dial. If its VT I will officially bash Parcells. That would set this team so far back emotionally.

Romo is subtly on the spot as I read into the dynamics. Henson is going nowhere and will also not be #2. Its up to Romo to win backup job. That said Romo can go from #2 to cut if he fails in next week to 10 days.......

I'm pulling for the kid. And who's on speed dial?



Please show me a link the these articles from anyone associated with the Dallas Cowboys



v1i14p1.2.gif
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,810
Reaction score
112,654
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Nors said:
Bledsoe I'd say is a lock to start. But Romo has an opening if he can light it up in preseason games. Say he has a few 15-19 200 yard games and moves the ball and scores points.

Does Parcells start him if Bledsoe is so/so?
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,810
Reaction score
112,654
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
SultanOfSix said:
Yes, because he has "moxie", has started more than 8 games since high school, is excellent at golf, and last but not least, he's not Drew Henson.
You forgot "he didn't play baseball".
 

SALADIN

Jumper
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
14
LaTunaNostra said:
Nors, your not so subtle point that Henson has been eliminated from the competition did not go unnoticed.


:lmao:

That train is always on time.
 

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Nors said:
I'm pulling for the kid. And who's on speed dial?

I'm pulling for him too, because what could be on speed dial is scary.

Has Blake been released from Philly, btw? Huard from KC? (as an example)

We won't have to worry about something as ancient as Chris Chandler, (not after Vinnie) but ANY vet QB who has seen several (or a hundred) system and doesn't require milk feeding could be on that dial.

If anyone scoffs and says 'Tuna only trusts his guys and won't sign someone he has no history with', I think they are mistaken. Bill's just run out of those.

I recall Tuna once sounding off on why Scott Zolak was an excellent back up... we know what he's doing these days, Nors, but anything similar any bit younger could be on that dial.

It's up to YOUR boy to make sure that Bill doesn't have to dial up 1-800-hasbeen quarterback.
 

Banned_n_austin

Benched
Messages
5,834
Reaction score
10
LaTunaNostra said:
I'm pulling for him too, because what could be on speed dial is scary.

Has Blake been released from Philly, btw? Huard from KC? (as an example)

We won't have to worry about something as ancient as Chris Chandler, (not after Vinnie) but ANY vet QB who has seen several (or a hundred) system and doesn't require milk feeding could be on that dial.

If anyone scoffs and says 'Tuna only trusts his guys and won't sign someone he has no history with', I think they are mistaken. Bill's just run out of those.

I recall Tuna once sounding off on why Scott Zolak was an excellent back up... we know what he's doing these days, Nors, but anything similar any bit younger could be on that dial.

It's up to YOUR boy to make sure that Bill doesn't have to dial up 1-800-hasbeen quarterback.

I applaud the fact that you're being realistic about this, Barb. You put some of the men on this board to shame.

I'm glad somebody gets it.

If only we could pull some of our other fellow fans heads' out of the sand.

This is a real possibility that another QB not on our roster could be brought in.

Why ignore it?

Props to you for not doing so.
 
Top