Romo's comment on top 100 players

[Califan007]

How's that?

I'm gonna assume you've read the thread and already know the answer to your question lol...

 

[DFWJC]

So in response to this laughable top 100 list...that even left Jimmy Graham totally off the list--Kurt Warner gave his top 10 QBs today.

Yes , Romo made the top 10, so he would have been ahead of 7 on that dumb list, vs not on it at all.

 

[DFWJC]

I think their suggestin to make it an online drag and drop thing for the voters would help.
Plus, picking the top 20 is not enough.
I mean, if that is all they picked,it means someone out there put the Minnesota tight end in their top 20 overall players. It would have had to be real high too get him in the to 100.

If people are picking honestly,there are a bunch of obvious top 100 players that would never make any honest top 20 list. Pick 50-60 maybe. Even then it'll be massively flawed, as A voting WR may ave no idea how good various olineman are around the league, other than hearsay.

I didnt notice, but I assume players cannot vote for their own teammates.

 

[Califan007]

So in response to this laughable top 100 list...that even left Jimmy Graham totally off the list--Kurt Warner gave his top 10 QBs today.

Yes , Romo made the top 10, so he would have been ahead of 7 on that dumb list, vs not on it at all.

If Romo isn't on the list, it's flawed...I get it. Maybe if he were #91 again like last year the list would be more valid?...Or, say, #70?...

But again, even if every single player voted, ranked their top 100 players in order and gave a 3-paragraph written essay on why each player is ranked where they are, it still wouldn't be a valid list if Romo wasn't on it or if he wasn't on it high enough to satisfy you. I get it.

What I don't get is why it bothers you...it apparently doesn't bother Romo lol...and it shouldn't.

 

[AsthmaField]

If Romo isn't on the list, it's flawed...I get it. Maybe if he were #91 again like last year the list would be more valid?...Or, say, #70?...

But again, even if every single player voted, ranked their top 100 players in order and gave a 3-paragraph written essay on why each player is ranked where they are, it still wouldn't be a valid list if Romo wasn't on it or if he wasn't on it high enough to satisfy you. I get it.

What I don't get is why it bothers you...it apparently doesn't bother Romo lol...and it shouldn't.

It wouldn't be a valid list if they had Romo at #5. It is hopelessly flawed in its current format, and frankly, I don't know that you could ever come up with a top 100 that wasn't total crapola.

Just that Pitta is on that list and Jimmy Graham isn't tells you all you need to know about how useless it really is.

 

[Califan007]

It wouldn't be a valid list if they had Romo at #5. It is hopelessly flawed in its current format, and frankly, I don't know that you could ever come up with a top 100 that wasn't total crapola.

Just that Pitta is on that list and Jimmy Graham isn't tells you all you need to know about how useless it really is.

If you are trying to place some type of importance on the list, I agree with you 100%.

(By "you" I don't mean you specifically, by the way lol)

 

[DFWJC]

It wouldn't be a valid list if they had Romo at #5. It is hopelessly flawed in its current format, and frankly, I don't know that you could ever come up with a top 100 that wasn't total crapola.

Just that Pitta is on that list and Jimmy Graham isn't tells you all you need to know about how useless it really is.

True....