- Messages
- 101,886
- Reaction score
- 112,857
If we could only draft WR's and develop them we wouldn't have to trade or sign free agent WR's seemingly every off season.
theogt;2053175 said:I remember when everyone was raggin' on me for saying I'd do it for our 1st and 3rd a month or so ago.
It wasn't just you. And if it were an option on the table, we'd take it in the heart beat I'm sure. It'll likely take more unfortunately.FuzzyLumpkins;2053558 said:That was me and its still stupid.
Dude isnt a good route runner, is always hurt and will come next year anyway.
Anytime you let Matt friggin Millen set those terms you have an issue.
theogt;2053561 said:It wasn't just you. And if it were an option on the table, we'd take it in the heart beat I'm sure. It'll likely take more unfortunately.
Proven WRs are more valuable than unproven RBs.FuzzyLumpkins;2053585 said:yeah because there is an indication that we would do that. eh has said hes not trading up for top5 and what that will take for McFadden but now you think that this is what 'we'll' be willing to do for a lesser player for more money.
theogt;2053595 said:Proven WRs are more valuable than unproven RBs.
over 900 yards per season in his first 4 seasons in the NFL. It usually takes 2-3 years to develop as a WR, so I'd say that's pretty damn good.FuzzyLumpkins;2053602 said:Yeah hes real proven....
Probably better than what we might get today.theogt;2053612 said:over 900 yards per season in his first 4 seasons in the NFL. It usually takes 2-3 years to develop as a WR, so I'd say that's pretty damn good.
15.0 YPA. Not too shabby.