Rumor: Dallas was prepared to take DT Marcus Thomas in the 4th rd

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,651
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Investigation Into Marcus Thomas Swayed Broncos GM
By Andrew Mason, DenverBroncos.com

(CBS4/DenverBroncos.com) ENGLEWOOD, Colo. The sun had barely escaped from the horizon on the eastern plains of Colorado in the post-dawn hours of Aug. 29, but Ted Sundquist was not in the mood for a tranquil ease into a Sunday morning offseason routine.

The Broncos' general manager began that day -- the second of the 2007 NFL Draft -- by arriving at the club's headquarters and resuming the quest he commenced the night before, dialing one team after another, searching for a deal that would allow the Broncos to trade into the middle rounds and select before its next scheduled pick in the sixth round.

"I got in an hour early on Sunday and started calling and went through every single team until I got to 121, when Minnesota finally said yes," Sundquist said.

"I tried not to get too overextended. I'd have about four or five (at a time). I'd call when they were on the clock, as well, when I could see where they were at, and then I'd go right down the row. There were a couple of teams that had multiple fourth-rounders; I caught them on the front side and they said, 'Nah, I don't think so,' and I said, 'I'll see you on the second one.' Then we got back around and Minnesota was willing to do it.

"I called every single team and offered them the exact same thing that Minnesota took at the end of the fourth round and nobody would take it. (Other teams) had their players they wanted. Or, they weren't willing to move themselves out of the third round for next year's third-rounder. They still wanted the player, so what you saw were trades where teams would move back five or six spots in exchange for a fourth."

As it turned out, Sundquist said, the swap with the Vikings was timely if the Broncos were going to select Marcus Thomas, whom they had targeted to acquire since they selected Notre Dame offensive tackle Ryan Harris with the 70th overall pick.

"Marcus Thomas was going to be picked at 122 (a selection held by the Dallas Cowboys)," Sundquist said. "We had been told that."

If the Broncos had been able to retain the No. 86 selection that was dealt to the Jacksonville Jaguars in the trade to move up and pick Jarvis Moss in the first round, Thomas "probably" would have been Denver's second third-round choice.

THE COST OF THE TRADE

Eyebrows of draft observers arched at what the Broncos yielded in order to pick Thomas. It wasn't so much the sixth- and seventh-round choices that caused the stir, but the decision to send a third-rounder to the Vikings in the trade, moving the Broncos down to a pair of first-day selections next year.

At Head Coach Mike Shanahan's press conference following the Thomas selection, Shanahan was asked whether the package of picks was a "steep price to pay."

"It's not a very steep price to pay unless he is not with our program two weeks from now," Shanahan said.

Days later, Sundquist remained nonplussed by the notion.

"The 'steep price to pay' thing, once again, I'm baffled by, 'Why?'" Sundquist said. "It's too steep of a price if we end up picking in the top five of each round. But when has that happened in the life of most of our fans?"

Not since 1983.

"To me, when you identify a player that you feel like can come in and contribute to your football team now, I'm not going to sit and wait and say, 'It's too steep a price,' because there's this fictional ghost player in the third round next year that we could take -- and no one knows who that player would be," Sundquist continued.

"Is that guy (a 2008 third-rounder) going to have as big an impact on your football team as Marcus Thomas would have in '07? You have to ask yourself that. You don't know who that player is."

And on the Broncos' draft board, Thomas -- in terms of talent -- was close to first-round target Justin Harrell.

"Here's a guy who we feel may be as talented as Justin Harrell," Sundquist said.

The often-chronicled, character-based reasons why Thomas' draft stock descended from the first round down into the middle rounds meant the Broncos had to engage in a scrutinous investigation of Thomas' background before deciding whether he was worth a mid-round flyer.

"I think that due diligence was done in our interviewing of the player, our interviewing of people who coached and mentored this player and disciplined this player over the four years at Florida," Sundquist said.

INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING AND ANALYSIS

"I can assure the fans that it wasn't groupthink, that it wasn't about hearing what we wanted to hear," Sundquist said of the internal discussions that the Broncos brain trust conducted as they dissected Thomas' reume and decided whether to prioritize him on the draft board.

"I'll be honest with you -- when we first talked about this, I, the general manager, was not real happy with the scenario -- that this guy was one of the senior leaders, had an opportunity, blew his opportunity and let his team down," Sundquist said. "I spoke up during the meetings about that, and it bothered me -- it bothered me quite a bit.

"But as we dug deeper and deeper into what the real circumstances were surrounding what went on, I became more comfortable with the risk that we were taking versus what I felt like we were getting from Marcus as a football player both on and off the field, and his leadership ability. You ask those guys down there (at the University of Florida) who the leader of that team was -- it's Marcus."

But the Broncos' investigation went deep, contacting anyone they could find with even a passing connection to Thomas -- past and present coaches, football support-staff personnel, professors, instructors. Their primary scouts in the region are director of player personnel Jim Goodman and his son, scout Jeff Goodman; both are Florida alumnae, and Jim Goodman was on the Florida staff from 1989-90.

"The area scouts, when they go into the university, it's their responsibility to speak to as many different sources as they possibly can about the character of any player," Sundquist said. "We're not searching to find what we want to find; we're searching to find the truth. Then we have to make the final decision as to whether we want to 'take that risk' or bypass that risk."

Shanahan also coached on the Florida staff from 1980-83.

"Our ins with Florida when it comes to getting to the bottom of some of these (character) questions are as good or better than anybody in the league," Sundquist said.

The Broncos then supplemented that research by interviewing him at the Scouting Combine, bringing him to Dove Valley for a pre-draft visit, and scouring for information, even studying the video of his Combine press conference. No stone was left unturned.

"Our visits weren't publicized. There was a reason for that," Sundquist said, "but he was brought in here for a visit."

"As it became clear (Thomas) could help us, then we went back and rechecked and maybe we went to some other sources and talked to some other people, but it was as thorough a job as we've done," Sundquist said. "There's a gamut of other things that we use with regards to testing and things like that, and this kid is very, very high on those charts.

"We battled this darn thing out and talked about it and went back. Even after we had done the initial interviews, we went back and talked to more people and asked them, 'Really - what is going on here?'

"I got swayed to where I was willing to take the risk. Initially, I said, 'Guys, no.'"

But Sundquist proved malleable and open to the notion that Thomas could atone for his past problems.

"We're comfortable with the decision we made," he said.

LINK
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
it's funny, posters sometimes are angered by a perceived lack of a team trying to pick a player from a "needed" position, when in fact, they do try to pick them, but it sometimes just doesn't work out that way

w/ us trying to select Thomas in the 4th round when some fans say they were kinda miffed that Dallas didn't get a DT, and last year, when they were complaining that we waited too long to draft an Olineman when in fact, we were trying to draft Daryn Colledge in the 2nd, but we got beat to the punch, just like w/ Thomas

idk, it's just funny
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
That would have been an interesting choice. I recall thinking that once Denver jumped ahead of us. This might be one to keep an eye on as one that "got away".

He's a first round talent, no doubt about it.
 

junk

I've got moxie
Messages
9,294
Reaction score
247
Weren't they supposedly targeting Zak DeOssie in the fourth as well as Doug Free, Stanback and now Thomas?

They had their eyes on a lot of guys in 4.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
junk;1497385 said:
Weren't they supposedly targeting Zak DeOssie in the fourth as well as Doug Free, Stanback and now Thomas?

They had their eyes on a lot of guys in 4.

Yet, amazingly, we got the "guys we wanted".:eek::
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
i am kinda glad we didnt get him, i think in time he will prove what he is, spots are hard to change, and denver is well noted for taking character bad boy players, and in time, that can cost you salary cap money if the player gets in trouble, possibly even a draft choice.

The new commissioner, to my mind will crack down on teams like bengals, denver that takes character issue players and that get into trouble. So, in long run, i think were better off not getting him, and taking a chance on stanback.

and its true, we have our offensive line fixed now i think with Doug Free, Colombo, Leonard Davis, Marten, and Mcquistan, so now what we need to concertrate with next draft is a young WR if Stanback doesnt work out, if he does, then go after a young NT and super running back McFadden if he is there with browns top draft choice.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,651
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Alexander;1497391 said:
Yet, amazingly, we got the "guys we wanted".:eek::
Well with two 4th rounders, it's possible they had a few guys at each slot, they wanted to take. And depending on who was available determined which one they got.

So, it doesn't mean they didn't want the guys they got, just that there were other guys they considered too. Same thing I remember reading about the Spencer pick.
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
Alexander;1497391 said:
Yet, amazingly, we got the "guys we wanted".:eek::


Yes, we always pull it off in April.......then by Sep....it is like what did we do?
 

StanleySpadowski

Active Member
Messages
4,815
Reaction score
0
These type of stories float around every year after the draft. 99% of them are bogus, started by teams to CYA as to why they took a player when they did....the so-and-sos were going to take him x picks later so we had to make a move.....it wasn't a reach...
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
31,231
Reaction score
72,767
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Alexander;1497391 said:
Yet, amazingly, we got the "guys we wanted".:eek::
We "always" get the guys "we wanted" :) :)

.. spin .. spin .. spin ..
 

Sandyf

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,248
Reaction score
1,379
Good article and interesting. Makes sense to why we didn't go there the rest of the draft.

Makes one wonder what we really would have done especially with Free there also at 122. According to the various rumors we were high on Free and Thomas at 122 and with Denver taking Thomas it made our decision easy.

I wonder though would Jerry have taken the deal with Denver for the same thing (3rd in 2008, 6th and 7th this year) and then tried to trade back in the round to get Free.

Or would we have taken Thomas and also tried to trade back to get Free. Interesting stuff but it happens ever year.

Teams have certain guys they want but someone else takes them and you settle for someone else. Lets just hope that Free becomes our next great LT.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,113
Reaction score
11,458
StanleySpadowski;1497415 said:
These type of stories float around every year after the draft. 99% of them are bogus, started by teams to CYA as to why they took a player when they did....the so-and-sos were going to take him x picks later so we had to make a move.....it wasn't a reach...

Exactly. Two words:

Quincy. Raiders.

:eek::
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Everyone gets guys they wanted. If they didn't want a guy, they wouldn't draft him.

Is it really that difficult to figure that out?
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,998
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Sounds like spin from Denver but who knows.

I just know when the cowboys were on the clock leading up to that second 4th round pick they were all celebrating and happy their guy fell to them and it happened to be Free.

I would doubt they would be celebrating like that if they lost out on the guy they really wanted but who knows.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,683
Reaction score
12,392
Reality;1497419 said:
We "always" get the guys "we wanted" :) :)

.. spin .. spin .. spin ..

I don't mind the "we got the guy we wanted" spin - what I DO mind is the "we were going to take him in the (fill in earlier round) spin"
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
You know, there is also the chance that Dallas had a trade in place for someone to get to #122 if Thomas was still there? The way Jerry was working the phones I actually see this as more likely. The only player I believe we had hoped for in the 4th was Zak DeOssie.
 

Angus

Active Member
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
20
Hostile;1497483 said:
You know, there is also the chance that Dallas had a trade in place for someone to get to #122 if Thomas was still there? The way Jerry was working the phones I actually see this as more likely. The only player I believe we had hoped for in the 4th was Zak DeOssie.

I think this is the real state of the affair. Dallas was not going to take a guy with that baggage, but likely another team had arranged to take him with the Dallas pick if he was still there. The Denver story doesn't say Dallas was going to take him at 122, but only that they knew he would be taken then. There almost had to be another team involved for Denver to know that. Somebody leaked.

:)
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Angus;1497546 said:
I think this is the real state of the affair. Dallas was not going to take a guy with that baggage, but likely another team had arranged to take him with the Dallas pick if he was still there. The Denver story doesn't say Dallas was going to take him at 122, but only that they knew he would be taken then. There almost had to be another team involved for Denver to know that. Somebody leaked.

:)
Wasn't there a report that he was the only player off our Draft board? I really think someone else was taking him at 122 and had a deal with us for that pick and it got pulled off the table.
 

5mics

Next Year's Champions
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
0
WoodysGirl;1497363 said:
Investigation Into Marcus Thomas Swayed Broncos GM
By Andrew Mason, DenverBroncos.com



LINK
I wanted a NT real bad w/ one of our 4th BUT would have rather had Soliai (who we did have a shot at but bypassed) instead of Thomas. I'm very happy we took Free and Thomas wasn't around (in case the story was true). Free & Marten will be our bookend tackles in the near future, imo.....
 
Top