S. jones: starting safeties could be on roster already

[Doomsay]

No it isn't, the insurance remark refers to signing a veteran in free agency and with their cap situation is was always going to be a cheap alternative. When he was talking about biggest need he was referring to the draft and his reasoning had to do with both safeties coming off injuries. He even referred to Church's injury again in the recent interview and mentioned Johnson "could" be the guy:

First interview


Second interview

"Biggest need" <> "We may get some insurance there": Factually different statements.

 

[speedkilz88]

"Biggest need" <> "We may get some insurance there": Factually different statements.

No, he was talking about the draft that he felt safety was the biggest defensive need because they had two guys coming off injuries. That is fact. In this 2nd interview when he was talking about possibly signing a vet similar to the Ernie Sims signing for insurance. The reason being they never know who is going to be available when they pick and it's smart to at least have an vet option so you don't find yourself reaching in the draft. Nothing he said conflicts except in a warped mind that wants it to.

 

[TwoDeep3]

How many years has this management said something just like this about safety?