Score predictions if Cutler had played??
- Thread starter felix360
- Start date
DEMARC0MURRAY29
Active Member
- Messages
- 325
- Reaction score
- 146
McCown is better.
FLCowboyFan
Hoping to be half the man Tom Landry was.
- Messages
- 4,967
- Reaction score
- 3,555
49-28. Just the same as without him
- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
In this offense, he probably is.
ScipioCowboy
More than meets the eye.
- Messages
- 25,266
- Reaction score
- 17,597
It couldn't have gotten much worse.
felix360
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 21
I agree they did but they did score 3 FGS. could have been touchdowns with Cutler. Just Saying
Blackspider214
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,129
- Reaction score
- 15,994
How would Cutler have been any better than tonight? 8 possessions. 8 scores. You aren't getting better than that.
Tabascocat
Dexternjack
- Messages
- 27,779
- Reaction score
- 38,822
This, Cutler may never play another down for the Bears. I don't know his contract situation though, just saying
felix360
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 21
Not that hard to figure out, as I stated before, turn those 3 fg's into tds that worse than tonight.
Blackspider214
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,129
- Reaction score
- 15,994
Huh?? The score was 45-28. 3 FGs into 3 TDs is 12 extra points. You arrive at 57. Where is 63 coming from? Math? How does it work.
I still fail to see your point.
felix360
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 21
forget it u missed my point
Blackspider214
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,129
- Reaction score
- 15,994
No your point is very dumb. So because a starter plays, who is known for stupid decisions and turning the ball over, will get the same production, and have 8 TDS in 8 possessions.
And anyways, your math sucks.
felix360
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 21
The math is not the point here. Read the all the post correctly. I originally stated the thread saying my prediction if Cutler had played. Someone else posted saying it couldn't be worse than 8 posessions and 8 scores. MY POINT WAS THAT IT COULD BE WORSE IF THEY SCORED 3 TDS INSTEAD OF 3 FGS. AT THIS POINT I WAS NO LONGER WRITING ABOUT THE SCORE I PREDICTED. AT THIS POINT IN THE THREAD, THE TOPIC HAS CHANGED FROM THE PREDICTIONS TO HOW MUCH WORSE THE SCORE COULD HAVE BEEN. Again how is my point dumb? That was my whole point and why I mentioned the 3 fg's.