And also a 1 year rental...If they let Sherman go, our best trade piece is Byron. Young, good size and length, and obviously the athleticism. He's closer to the mold of Sherman than Scandrick, and maybe a guy you'd want to sign to a new contract.
You think Seattle wants to play Earl twice a year?
Except Jerry Jones. I hope Stephen talks him into doing something with Dez if he doesn't agree to a restructure.
3...2...1... Go
Charles Robinson
Been told by a few teams the #Seahawks had open ears at the #NFLCombine. Seattle trade commodities drawing interest: defensive tackle Michael Bennett and safety Earl Thomas. Nothing imminent. But hearing Seattle would like to remedy having zero draft picks in 2nd and 3rd round.
And also a 1 year rental...
He talked about retirement literally hours after suffering a broken leg and ending his season. It was an emotional response of a competitive, disappointed player. Had nothing to do with Eric Berry's contract.
You are right
So then you have to sign him because you can’t give a pick to rent one year
Also with tagging Dlaw and tendering Irving we’d probably have to clear some money too
We have contracts we can do though
My fear is what he wants to get paid
Its not a move Cleveland SHOULD make. But a move they wouldn't make? I don't know about that one. You seem to think its a one year rental. If so....with as many draft picks and young players they have.....a one year rental for a 4th round pick where their head coach's job is on the line? Wouldn't' put it past them.
And for the record I'm not saying the Browns would do this. There may be some teams that would. I don't really know who's in the market for Earl Thomas. I'd imagine that a lot of contenders are.
The thing about the NFL is that due to parity...everyone feels they are just a offseason away. Even at 0-4....they still think they have a shot.
Its not that easy. They've spent resources on that defense. But the problem has been when they fix one problem two more pop up. That's the story of the NFL. Their defense hasn't been terrible. They have never went after that easy fix in free agency. But I'm not sure if that easy fix was ever there in free agency.
Not only is that incorrect, when it was pointed out to you by other posters you then attempted to spin this nonsense into something else. Just admit you spoke off the top of your head and weren't aware of his comments. We're all allowed to be wrong sometimes. Later pretending you meant something else is just lame.
Seattle Seahawks safety Earl Thomas was asked Tuesday when he got over thoughts of retirement and decided he wanted to resume his career after breaking his leg in Week 13 of last season.
"I couldn't tell you exactly at what point," Thomas said. "It was a little bit of everything. I just felt like it wasn't time. I saw Eric Berry get that huge deal."
That is exactly why they wouldn't want Scandrick in trade either. It would defeat the purpose as they would have to absorb his salary.
Once again, it may "not be that bad", if their idea is to shed cap in chunks, they would not take tradeoffs to do it in smaller increments.Scandrick's contract is not that bad, tough. I think he's near $3M per.
RD3 for Thomas, and if it took a comp pick. Let it fly
You'd have to think that conversation already happened (either way).Kris Richards probably in Garrett’s office right now
I hope soYou'd have to think that conversation already happened (either way).
LmaoooI spent a good five minutes trying to figure out who RD3 was