Sean Lee's week 2 game vs the eagles

BigD

Got 5? We do!
Messages
585
Reaction score
212
After starting out 2-0 it's still hard to believe we only won two more games the rest of the season after that philly win.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
After starting out 2-0 it's still hard to believe we only won two more games the rest of the season after that philly win.

That was an extremely dominant performance by the whole defense and fun to watch. Probably the best game plan Marinelli has put together since being in Dallas.

But all in all, it just goes to show you how deep the Romo Dependency runs.

The rest of the season was disrupted by a lack of faith in the offense to produce. Save the blitz happy first Commanders game, Marinelli did not do much to compensate in Romo-less games.

The Commanders was very much out of character with the pressure packages. The remainder of the time, he was trying to eliminate big plays and scoring, but teams simply chose to allow the defense to slowly bleed out because they knew our offense was incapable of getting leads and putting up points.
 

HomeBiscuit

Well-Known Member
Messages
309
Reaction score
985
Well he played at least most of season a couple of times. Added Romo since we saw what we are without him last year. And I think we would've gotten past the packers and Seattle with Lee.
 

pancakeman

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,171
Reaction score
2,856
If you listen to the Eagles making excuses afterwards, they seemed to be implying the Cowboys were somehow stealing their signals.



I have to admit, I was braced for a scandal, because it really did seem like the Cowboys knew the plays.
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,551
Reaction score
32,318
If you listen to the Eagles making excuses afterwards, they seemed to be implying the Cowboys were somehow stealing their signals.



I think it was just more about Chip Kelly being extremely predictable as opposed to us knowing the signs.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
I think it was just more about Chip Kelly being extremely predictable as opposed to us knowing the signs.

Perhaps true. It just was nice to see a nicely executed dominant defensive performance, no matter how it happened. They have been few and far between since Phillips was fired.

Plus I also think the Cowboys wanted that game badly, especially with the Murray factor. Lee certainly did.
 

TheHerd

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,543
Reaction score
15,007
That was an extremely dominant performance by the whole defense and fun to watch. Probably the best game plan Marinelli has put together since being in Dallas.

But all in all, it just goes to show you how deep the Romo Dependency runs.

The rest of the season was disrupted by a lack of faith in the offense to produce. Save the blitz happy first Commanders game, Marinelli did not do much to compensate in Romo-less games.

The Commanders was very much out of character with the pressure packages. The remainder of the time, he was trying to eliminate big plays and scoring, but teams simply chose to allow the defense to slowly bleed out because they knew our offense was incapable of getting leads and putting up points.

I think the game plan going into the Pats game was pretty good as well, but we failed to counter adjust after the Pats changed things up after halftime.
 
Top