bbgun
Benched
- Messages
- 27,869
- Reaction score
- 6
Plenty of good announcers out there that were also former players.
I agree. But can you name one crew at CBS, NBC, Fox or ESPN that doesn't have an ex-jock on it? That can't be a coincidence.
Plenty of good announcers out there that were also former players.
lane said:i can't stand baldinger and maas....
Can you get rid of the sideline reporters first?bbgun said:Is there some sort of rule that you have to have an ex-athlete in the booth? Can't you just have two people who are, you know, knowledgable about football? Isn't it enough that the neanderthals and ebonics crowd dominate the pre-game shows?
VACowboy said:Hmmm. I never liked Sterling Sharpe when he was at ESPN and haven't seen him since. Has he really improved that much?
Far as jocks who DON'T belong in the booth, Theezman gets my vote. He's pure idiot with the mouth to prove it.
I love Jaws, Aikman, Moose, Madden and, unlike most people, I enjoy Collinsworth's glass half full commentary.
VACowboy said:Hmmm. I never liked Sterling Sharpe when he was at ESPN and haven't seen him since. Has he really improved that much?
I prefer to have someone with first hand knowledge of the game. I think Dierdorf does a very good job when you get past his speech impediment. And guys like Howie, Jaws, Jimmy Johnson, Moose, Aikman and Marino to name a few do a very good job as analyst. I would certainly rather hear any of them than some jerk like John Clayton, Skip Clueless or Kornholio.bbgun said:Ditka, Parcells at ESPN, Goose on the sidelines, Dierdorf, etc.
Pretty much, but I thought he was too much into himself then.VACowboy said:LTN, were you a Sterling fan when he was at ESPN?
Come on Jack, nobody can belt out "You're Just Too Good to Be True" like Tony.JackMagist said:...articulate and intelligent (note that this description does NOT apply to Goose...you are absolutely right about that buffoon).
They all do that when they first get into the business...it is the only point of reference they have. The good ones grow out of it and these days I am actually starting to like Sterling Sharp myself.LaTunaNostra said:Pretty much, but I thought he was too much into himself then.
He's matured, and no longer thumps his own chest and calls attention to his past career.
That was the only thing I didn't like about him.
TruBlueCowboy said:So here's a fun question: Which of the current Cowboys (player or coach) do you think has the most potential in the broadcast booth or pre-game shows? Back when they were playing, honestly.. i never thought Aikman would make it. Moose I knew had the potential, as well as Nate Newton. Deion Sanders and Michael Irvin were going to get a chance. Always had a high opinion of Darren Woodson and knew he was going to move up fast too. (Which he has.)
Of the current players... maybe Terrell Owens? They'll throw him in on name value alone. He's a competent interview guy but not as insightful as an ex-player like Darren Woodson or Moose. Marco Rivera? Drew Bledsoe would probably be my favorite pick. He's a smart fella, good with the media, and any half-famous QB is automatically reserved a spot somewhere. Jason Ferguson has the personality.
LaTunaNostra said:Yeah Fergie, does have a lot of persoanlity, but he isn't overly ambitious and I doubt a nose tackle will get many ops unless he is. He's funny, but low key.
Bledsoe is a bloody bore. (which doesn't mean he can't do tv - after all, Steve Young does.)
I don't know about TO. He isn't as quick witted as some of the other flamboyant receivers (aka MI and Key -who seems a "natural".
My guess tho, to answer your question, is Roy.
LaTunaNostra said:My guess tho, to answer your question, is Roy.
I agree, I wouldn't pick Roy as one even though he's a "star." After every interview he's done, I've always been like, "Did he say that?"godofwar said:Don't get me wrong, I loves me some Roy. After the Commanders game, he was interviewed, and did not seem to speak very well when having to think on his feet. Granted he was just coming off the field, tired, and he probably had his mind elsewhere. I remember thinking to myself that he interviews the same way Emmitt did. He may have something to say, but just has a hard time articualting it to the masses.
Of course, this is only one example I'm thinking about.