KingCorcoran
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,042
- Reaction score
- 5,890
Tagged he has degree of control of any trade. The tag doesn’t give him long term security, but it doesn’t give the Cowboys cap flexibility. If the Cowboys can sign the players they need to improve with 9% of the 2026 salary cap devoted to George Pickens then by all means tag him.I'm not giving him a max deal, or max aav deal. I'd rather let him play on the tag, but I would offer somewhere around 30 but with an out after 2 years. Or he can go someplace else as long as we get a good trade package. What I wouldn't do is pay him 35+ or let him go for a 3rd. I do prefer giving him options and sticking to it, this is what were willing to pay or you get tagged or you can be traded but here it is.
I don’t believe there is a team out there that thinks Pickens at $30+ million per year for the next three four years is a better VALUE than the wide receiver they can draft in the first round in April. And Pickens (Mulugheta) is not going to sign that tag unless he is getting the money he wants. Dallas can’t trade him until he signs the tag.
Jerry will mess around with Pickens, April will come and go, so now it’s about the 2027 draft. If it gets to mid-July, still no deal or trade, and George Pickens cannot be traded and he cannot sign a deal with the Cowboys. This is not how a team trying to build a winner goes about things. Pickens will play for Dallas, be in poor humor all season long, and lord forbid he suffers even a tiny injury, because that $28+ million tag salary is an absolute guarantee.
Tag him. See what happens. No team is stupid enough to trade significant draft capital for George Pickens. Not with the receivers available in this draft. George is in a good place.
