So I guess the real question is..

cowboyed

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,681
Reaction score
1,710
dargonking999;2372147 said:
Wow the serious responses in the post are even funnier than the OP.

You guys seriously need to work on the sarcasm meter.

The problem is there are enough earnest but off base threads started or replies indicating that we are going to automatically lose to the BUCS. It is not unreasonable to believe his thread was sincere.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Yes, Brett Favre would have played.

I am not a doctor, so I have no idea what long term risks Tony Romo could expose himself too, if he indeed player without being 100%

What is odd is that Tony Romo stated last week that he thought he could go, then doesn't play and the next thing you hear is that it will be about 3 weeks.

Jerry Jones and the Cowboys totally mismanaged the situation. Tony Romo should have kept his mouth shut and Wade Phillips and Jerry Jones should have been the ones feeding the media information.

Suffice it to say, I gurantee you if the season tanks, Tony Romo will be blamed because he didn't play, whether it is fair or not.

Also, does the OP suggest that we should have traded for Brett Favre for backup duties or as a fulltime starter? There is no way in hell Brett Favre comes to Dallas and rides the pine.

But it would be cool if he did come here as a backup, it would be fun to see him sling it around with all these weapons we have :eek:: .
 
Top