Speculation: L.A. gets a team in 2009....

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
Official: NFL to play in Los Angeles next season

By Jennifer McLain and Ben Baeder, Staff Writers
Article Launched: 08/27/2008 09:55:14 PM PDT



var requestedWidth = 0;
if(requestedWidth > 0){ document.getElementById('articleViewerGroup').style.width = requestedWidth + "px"; document.getElementById('articleViewerGroup').style.margin = "0px 0px 10px 10px"; } INDUSTRY - Developer Ed Roski Jr.'s business partner says he has "no doubt" a National Football League team will play in Los Angeles in 2009, most likely at the Rose Bowl. Majestic Realty Vice President John Semcken also said he believes there is a possibility two NFL teams could wind up playing in the $800 million stadium Roski wants to build in Industry.
"We are going to have a team here next September," Semcken said Tuesday afternoon.
"I personally believe, yes," two teams will come to L.A., he said. "Because the economics are so (good). All I want is one. All our analysis is based on one. If a second team came it would just be a tenant. We're only going to own one."
Roski is a billionaire listed in the Forbes 500 list of the world's richest people. He is president of Industry-based Majestic Realty, part-owner of the NBA's Lakers and NHL's Kings, and co-owner of the Staples Center.
In April, Roski unveiled his plan to build a state-of-the-art football stadium and entertainment complex on a 600-acre plot of land that was previously slated for commercial and retail use.
The anticipated stadium pricetag of $800 million would be about $1 billion less than was spent on the new home of the New York Giants and Jets, Semcken said.
Roski wants to buy a controlling interest in an NFL team and move it to his new stadium, planned to be built near the intersection of the 57 and 60 freeways. Semcken said that Roski has a "handshake deal" with
Advertisement
GetAd('tile','box','/news_article','','www.sgvtribune.com','','null','null');​

Rose Bowl officials to allow an NFL team to play in Pasadena for two seasons, until his new stadium is finished.
Semcken also said NFL executives asked him to make sure the stadium and its training facilities could accommodate two teams.
"Every owner I have talked to is interested in coming," Semcken said. "The idea of moving here is like Nirvana to them."
NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said that the league has long identified the Los Angeles region as a two-team market.
The L.A. area has been home to two pro football teams before. The NFL's Rams and the American Football League's Chargers both played in Los Angeles in 1960. When the Rams moved to Anaheim in 1980, it opened the way for the Raiders to move to the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum from Oakland. They did so in 1982.
Both the Rams and Raiders played in Southern California through the 1994 season, when the Rams moved to St. Louis and the Raiders returned to Oakland.
"It doesn't mean that we will have two teams there next season, but we have looked at an option that would provide flexibility so that should we have a team there someday. The site could also accommodate another team," McCarthy said.
Seven teams have expressed interest coming to Roski's stadium, but Semcken declined to name them. He said identifying teams could hurt ticket sales in their current stadiums.
In April, Roski listed the New Orleans Saints, Buffalo Bills, Minnesota Vikings, Jacksonville Jaguars, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and San Francisco 49ers as teams that might move to L.A. and his new stadium.
If a team agrees to move and Roski acquires at least part ownership, Semcken said it would play at the Rose Bowl for two seasons while the Industry site is developed. The stadium is expected to be completed in time for the 2011 season.
Semcken said an NFL team playing in the Rose Bowl would not negatively impact UCLA, which is the Rose Bowl's main tenant.
"We've had just very preliminary talks so far," said Darryl Dunn, general manager of the Rose Bowl. "We are definitely interested in anything that could bring in revenue."
Any agreement the NFL reaches would need to be approved by the Rose Bowl officials, Pasadena and UCLA, Dunn said. UCLA officials did not return calls Wednesday.
"The Rose Bowl Operating Company does not have a handshake deal with Majestic Realty for an NFL team," said Charles Thompson, spokesman for the Rose Bowl Operating Company.
Bringing an NFL team to Pasadena - even temporarily - would require community and council support, said Pasadena city spokeswoman Ann Erdman.
In 2006, Pasadena voters rejected Measure A, which would have allowed the NFL to renovate the stadium for NFL purposes.
"As it stands now, the stadium is not NFL ready," Erdman said. "So, therefore, should there sometime in the future be a major renovation to make it NFL ready, there would be many, many processes to go through."
Norman Parker, president of the Linda Vista/Annandale Association, said that the community has had a fine relationship with Rose Bowl management.
"For a couple of years, we could manage with (an NFL team) quite well, and the Rose Bowl would get some well-needed revenue," Parker said. "We look forward to working with them."
Roski's Los Angeles Stadium would seat 75,000 fans, have 175 suites, could have up to 5 million square feet available for commercial use, and provide nearly 6,000 jobs.

Saints.my guess.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
thewireman;2217375 said:
Geez why does California need 4 football teams? Seems a little excessive to me

The question is, how many times will the NFL give a franchise to LA only to have it leave? Will the NFL ever learn?
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
I could care less what a "developer" thinks. Until a league official confirms it, it's all BS.
 

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
I think its the Saints,that city cannot afford pro sports,last year in the NBA playoffs they couldnt even sell out games.They actually got caught fibbing the numbers meanwhile a pile of empty seats were in the rafters.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
thewireman;2217375 said:
Geez why does California need 4 football teams? Seems a little excessive to me

B/c CA has 15 million more people then next largest state?

Just a guess.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
juckie;2217413 said:
I think its the Saints,that city cannot afford pro sports,last year in the NBA playoffs they couldnt even sell out games.They actually got caught fibbing the numbers meanwhile a pile of empty seats were in the rafters.

I would have agreed before Katrina now I think the NFL will do whatever they can to keep the Saints in New Orleans
 

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
Lets do this....

We move to NFC South.Where we belong.
Saint in LA go to NFC West.
St.Louis to Nfc east.

Yeah baby we win the division every year:lmao2:
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
AbeBeta;2217419 said:
B/c CA has 15 million more people then next largest state?

Just a guess.

Cowboys have 15 million more fans than all other teams and they require all 50 states for their fans. :laugh2:
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
juckie;2217429 said:
Lets do this....

We move to NFC South.Where we belong.
Saint in LA go to NFC West.
St.Louis to Nfc east.

Yeah baby we win the division every year:lmao2:

Jerry Jones would fight that tooth and nail just as he did the last time we did realignment. NFC East is where we belong
 

Da Hammer

The Natural
Messages
10,604
Reaction score
1
nyc;2217386 said:
The question is, how many times will the NFL give a franchise to LA only to have it leave? Will the NFL ever learn?
Exactly this stupid obsession of the NFL wanting to have a NFL team in Los Angeles needs to stop already! The NFL has proven already they dont need Los Angeles to thrive tremendously!
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
Da Hammer;2217468 said:
Exactly this stupid obsession of the NFL wanting to have a NFL team in Los Angeles needs to stop already! The NFL has proven already they dont need Los Angeles to thrive tremendously!

But if they can net one penny more, they'll do it.

Homer: You know, Mr. Burns, you're the richest guy I know. Way richer than Lenny.

Burns: Oh yes. But I'd trade it all for a little more.
 

Da Hammer

The Natural
Messages
10,604
Reaction score
1
bbgun;2217481 said:
But if they can net one penny more, they'll do it.

Homer: You know, Mr. Burns, you're the richest guy I know. Way richer than Lenny.

Burns: Oh yes. But I'd trade it all for a little more.
i undestand that point but so far they havent been able to succeed in Los Angeles. Maybe i missed something,,, did something change to convince the NFL that all of a sudden the people of Los Angeles will support their team???
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
thewireman;2217459 said:
Regardless 4 teams for a single state is to much
The state has nothing to do with it. Los Angeles is market number 2 in the country and doesn't have a team. That's ridiculous, and the NFL could make a lot more money in LA than they can in Buffalo, New Orleans, Minnesota or Jacksonville. New York has three teams and one of them is in Buffalo, which is the number 45 market in the US. New Orleans is number 42 and Jacksonville is number 40. (These are 2003 numbers)
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
peplaw06;2217568 said:
The state has nothing to do with it. Los Angeles is market number 2 in the country and doesn't have a team. That's ridiculous, and the NFL could make a lot more money in LA than they can in Buffalo, New Orleans, Minnesota or Jacksonville. New York has three teams and one of them is in Buffalo, which is the number 45 market in the US. New Orleans is number 42 and Jacksonville is number 40. (These are 2003 numbers)

I agree that is why the NFL continues to push it. Outside of New York, LA is the biggest media market and home of the major networks.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
Da Hammer;2217523 said:
i undestand that point but so far they havent been able to succeed in Los Angeles. Maybe i missed something,,, did something change to convince the NFL that all of a sudden the people of Los Angeles will support their team???

Because LA is a much bigger market than Jacksonville and it's all about ratings and potential ad revenue.
 

Big Country

Rolling Thunder
Messages
3,761
Reaction score
40
What the heck does LA need a football team for??? They never wanted the last two that occupied that smoghole. They have the LA Beckhams anyway
 
Top