Future
Intramural Legend
- Messages
- 27,566
- Reaction score
- 14,714
What, this again? It is. Well, 55.5 is, but whatever.Just to keep tabs, you’re the same guy that:
You’re “winning” luuulz.
- Still thinks 55 is 150% of 37
37x1.5
What, this again? It is. Well, 55.5 is, but whatever.Just to keep tabs, you’re the same guy that:
You’re “winning” luuulz.
- Still thinks 55 is 150% of 37
That's a false comparison, its like saying one guy got hurt in a boxing match while the other got hurt in a yoga class.
The 1989 team was the worst team in the league with a horrible OL, Aikman took a pounding on every series. There was a lot of speculation Aikman wouldn't recover, similar to what happened to David Carr in Houston. 1989 was long before the rules changed to protect QBs from taking hits, defenders could take a running start to crush the QB and often did. Wentz played in an era were Randy Gregory was flagged for roughing the passer because he pulled Wentz down by his thighs.
Wentz was playing behind an OL with multiple Pro Bowl players and had a lot less rushing plays than Prescott. Prescott has also been injured in games repeatedly where he didn't leave the game.
what im saying is most qbs improve dramatically from their rookie year. Favre was awful, steve young was awful, aaron rodgers was substandard the first year he started. Using rookie year to determine who's better 4 years down the road doesnt really make sense.
Dak has had better stats cumulatively because of his rookie year, sure. But that has no bearing how he is as a qb today.
With Troy you have the benefit of hindsight which the Eagles do not. Right now the only thing anyone can know for sure, Wentz gets hurt a lot and going to back to College has not finished the season 4 consecutive years.
I agree that Dak and Wentz aren't that far apart (though, as a passer, I don't really think it's close), but you're badly overstating Dak's last 10 games. There were some big plays that nullified poor performance (i.e. Philly, Atlanta), but other than the Giants game week 17, he was pretty pedestrian. Better than the back half of 2017 and pre-Amari 2018, but that's a really low bar.That’s true. The rookie season doesn’t.
Then again, if we are talking about most recent performance. Dak was playing at a very high level the last half of the season and playoffs.
If he continues to play at that level or improves from there, then the team will be in good shape. Dak was playing really well overall the last 10 games he has played in.
Dak’s performance has taken an uneven trajectory, as opposed to Wentz which has been a more even trajectory.
But if we are going based off RIGHT NOW they are also still pretty even. As Dak’s stats the last 10
Games are so are probably very close to Carson’s I would imagine. I don’t know for sure but I am estimating.
Wasn't the worst team in year 2 or 3 infact they made the playoffs in year three, Aikman still missed many games his first 3 seasons
Pretty much.That was a completely different era. If Aikman played under the "put a dress on the QB" rules he never would have missed a snap.
That was a completely different era. If Aikman played under the "put a dress on the QB" rules he never would have missed a snap.
That was a completely different era. If Aikman played under the "put a dress on the QB" rules he never would have missed a snap.
That’s true. The rookie season doesn’t.
Then again, if we are talking about most recent performance. Dak was playing at a very high level the last half of the season and playoffs.
If he continues to play at that level or improves from there, then the team will be in good shape. Dak was playing really well overall the last 10 games he has played in.
Dak’s performance has taken an uneven trajectory, as opposed to Wentz which has been a more even trajectory.
But if we are going based off RIGHT NOW they are also still pretty even. As Dak’s stats the last 10
Games are so are probably very close to Carson’s I would imagine. I don’t know for sure but I am estimating.
Ya whatever because players don't hit as hard today...lol and aren't way bigger now than they were 30 years ago
Ya whatever because players don't hit as hard today...lol and aren't way bigger now than they were 30 years ago
However big they are, they aren't allowed to put their body weight on a QB or hit the QB after more than 2 steps. You clearly didn't watch the games back in Aikman's era.
Of course i did and that rule you mentioned is 1 year old not 10 or 15 years and it doesn't say you can't hit hard it says you can't "drive " the QB into the ground
What, this again? It is. Well, 55.5 is, but whatever.
37x1.5
150% more isn't what you said originally in this thread.We already went through this and I even posted the links (and post #s).
“Cowboy have almost 150% more Rushing TDs from 2016 to 2018”:
https://cowboyszone.com/threads/goff-vs-prescott.428409/page-13#post-9026994
What’s comical is he thinks my description error somehow trumps his documented actual mathematical error.
I guess if you don’t grasp basic arithmetic ignorance becomes bliss.
Read Article 9 of the actual rulebook -
https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/2018-nfl-rulebook/#penalty-summary
150% more isn't what you said originally in this thread.
150% of and 150% more aren't the same thing.
- Still thinks 55 is 150% of 37
55 is 150% of 37.
55 is not 150% more than 37.
Don't give me the nonsense of arithmetic ignorance, because you're saying two different things. I don't remember where it came from, it was pointless to bring up again.
LMAO keep thinking that but from day one throw one, snap one you keep those stats for life and you are discounting Daks Rookie year and asking us to do so for Wentz just because he wasn't good..lmao bro..Dak should get credit for being BETTER his rookie year and so far hes been available and head to head having as good career as player who was picked 3 rounds higher and many draft picks giving up to go get him that was on the bench while his backup one the ring..) im supposed to commend him for that while discounting daks early success? its hard as rookie isnt it yet 4th round QB blew a 1st rounder off the final the first year..think hard about that..how wentz do in last years playoffs? oh right he held an Ipad for foles..)what im saying is most qbs improve dramatically from their rookie year. Favre was awful, steve young was awful, aaron rodgers was substandard the first year he started. Using rookie year to determine who's better 4 years down the road doesnt really make sense.
Dak has had better stats cumulatively because of his rookie year, sure. But that has no bearing how he is as a qb today.
150% more isn't what you said originally in this thread.
150% of and 150% more aren't the same thing.
- Still thinks 55 is 150% of 37
55 is 150% of 37.
55 is not 150% more than 37.
Don't give me the nonsense of arithmetic ignorance, because you're saying two different things. I don't remember where it came from, it was pointless to bring up again.