Still loving Garrett?

10 games into his HC career, two games into Ryan's defense, and all without an offseason. Oh the horror.

Down, again, to their 4th & 5th CB, 4th & 5th WRs and URFA center.

Fire them all. Now.


UVAwahoos;4121271 said:
The coaching is clearly not on par yet.
 
TheCount;4121310 said:
Last week, people got upset that he threw it three times on the goal line. People need to make up their minds.

Different situations should not be managed the same way. I don't think I need to point out the vast differences in these two situations to you. The worst part about it is both situations resulted in a fumble, just this time we managed to recover it.
 
Cowboyz88;4121313 said:
10 games into his HC career, two games into Ryan's defense, and all without an offseason. Oh the horror.

Down, again, to their 4th & 5th CB, 4th & 5th WRs and URFA center.

Fire them all. Now.

Dude, he didn't hold a gun to Jerry's head to steal the job. If he wasn't ready, then somebody who is ready should have been put in here. The team is talented enough to win it all. We're not gonna beat better teams if we have to overcome coaching errors from our own sideline again and again.

The fact is that his playcalling is still atrocious consistently enough to be a problem. This exists both with and without injuries...
 
Cythim;4121349 said:
Different situations should not be managed the same way. I don't think I need to point out the vast differences in these two situations to do. The worst part about it is both situations resulted in a fumble, just this time we managed to recover it.

You clearly need to be lobotomized. Nuanced views are not welcome. You must love or hate everything about every player, coach and game.
 
Wolfpack;4121312 said:
I think he is a great head coach and willing to make the hard choices. His attention to detail and intelligence will shape this team over time, similar, I think to the Landry teams. Well coached and sharp.

Red the play caller leads alot to be desired still. He has made progress but still lacks game day awarness and misses some of the contextual things about play calling. I think someone else mentioned that he over thinks himself and I think that sums him up well as an OC. Love to see him bring in an OC to help him call the game and at least offer a countpoint to shotgun on 3-1.

I think this is reasonable. He is consistently putting this team in bad situations as an offensive playcaller. Someone like Sparano would be perfect to provide some balance.
 
Cythim;4121349 said:
Different situations should not be managed the same way. I don't think I need to point out the vast differences in these two situations to do. The worst part about it is both situations resulted in a fumble, just this time we managed to recover it.

He did handle both situations differently...

I mean I agree with you that he has room for improvement as far as game planning goes, but can you deny that today was a cleaner game overall than the last one?
 
I'm cool with him as our leader and head coach but I absolutely HATE his goal line offense. Just run the ball and go quick play action. Enough with spreading the offense out, the NFL defenses have figured it out, and it's not working anymore.

Use a traditional goal line offense. And our lack of Running game is really starting to irritate me. Free sucked today as well. Butttttttt, enough of that.

Thats all for my complaining though, Defense was awesome, I love Rob Ryan. I love Romo, Austin and Holley as well! :)
 
Shinywalrus;4121257 said:
Yep. Because anyone who doesn't think Garrett is perfect should have part of their brain surgically removed.

Jeez, why does everything have to be all the way and exaggerated around here, even with the moderators. How about being moderate from time to time? Is there no place for fans who think that Garrett is a great guy who is doing great things with this team but who outthinks himself on play-calling?

Or do we all need our brains removed for such heresy, Hostile? ******.


...try to THINK and read your 'posts' at least 5x before hitting the enter button....
 
TheCount;4121374 said:
He did handle both situations differently...

I mean I agree with you that he has room for improvement as far as game planning goes, but can you deny that today was a cleaner game overall than the last one?

The second half with Romo was much better, everything before that was worse.
 
TheCount;4121374 said:
He did handle both situations differently...

I mean I agree with you that he has room for improvement as far as game planning goes, but can you deny that today was a cleaner game overall than the last one?

Tonight was a cleaner game. Questionable situational play calling in spots - the reverse and Austin run come to mind - but cleaner.
 
newlander;4121391 said:
...try to THINK and read your 'posts' at least 5x before hitting the enter button....

Do you have a comment to make? Or do you think that it is impossible to have a nuanced, partially positive and partially negative view of Garrett?
 
Garrett comes up with the most off the wall garbage when the game gets out of it's flow and gets more situational.


My gosh I wanna like that guy but his playcalling HAS to improve. It just has to.
 
Joshmvii;4121090 said:
The niners were pretty good at home last year, and barely lost to Philly and New Orleans. They have a ridiculous front seven that is very hard to run on, and they rush the passer pretty well without having to blitz.

They're not nearly as bad as some are making them out to be. The only thing that matters is getting a win, even if you have to fight for it.


this/
 
Shinywalrus;4121362 said:
You clearly need to be lobotomized. Nuanced views are not welcome. You must love or hate everything about every player, coach and game.


...too much excitement for you lady. I mean, I assume your a lady with all this emotion in your posts...go lay down and take a valium.:)


.....just doggin' you a little from earlier man. Garrett looks bad because his OLine sucks...quick: name an oline as bad as this in the league but who's coach/ocoordinator is successful? That's right, you can't. Red's fine...but this line isn't. Until we run the ball, his play calls and the schitzo nature of this offense won't change: fact.
 
Cythim;4121392 said:
The second half with Romo was much better, everything before that was worse.

Second half was definitely better, but a lot of why the 1st half was so bad is that the QB and receivers simply weren't in sync and they got zero help from the run game.

Shinywalrus;4121394 said:
Tonight was a cleaner game. Questionable situational play calling in spots - the reverse and Austin run come to mind - but cleaner.

Yeah, definitely some questions on some of the playcalling but I am absolutely thrilled with the improvement in crispness, even if it took a while to come together.
 
TheCount;4121374 said:
He did handle both situations differently...

I mean I agree with you that he has room for improvement as far as game planning goes, but can you deny that today was a cleaner game overall than the last one?

All I am trying to say is that he clearly is not there yet as a playcaller, and his need for improvement is going to cost this team games if he continues to get outcoached. We should not have to overcome our own coaching blunders in order to pull out wins. This team won today because we are just way better. That's not always going to be the case.
 
Back
Top