Sturm On Cowboys Contract Handling

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Now, there is one thing that I continue to be dissatisfied about, and that is the way they write their contracts. They do not write contracts that they intend to honor as written. They write contracts to allow them multiple restructures to accommodate other contracts that they have already restructured to make room for contracts that they wrote before that were restructured. And so on and so on and so on. There was some back and forth on this behavior this past week when Stephen Jones again defended the fine art of credit-card juggling.

They have so much dead money on Player A, that they must restructure Player B to free up the room. But, then, Player B cannot be cut because he isn't very good anymore, since the restructure guaranteed money for him in Year 3 of his deal (because of Player A's situation), so now we must restructure Player C's deal to accommodate Player B, who is only in his spot because of Player A. It is maddening. But, perhaps not as maddening as knowing we have all be desensitized to it as a poor way of doing business.

There are media folks who tell us "everyone does it", which is sort of true, but not. Yes, everyone you know uses credit cards. So, you can justify your credit card use by looking around the room and seeing everyone uses them. But, does everyone open up new credit cards to pay off the old ones? Does everyone max them out and have to sit out shopping because of the unpaid balances?

The Cowboys are doing better, but a sign that they are still in a weird spot is that they definitely need to retain some players, but in order to do so, they have to figure out how to restructure more deals to make even a little room.

http://sportsday.***BANNED-URL***/d.../2017/03/06/cowboys-money-problem-free-agency
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The thing I don't like about restructuring is that it pushes money up front and pays guys early.

That kills the motivation for some players.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,203
Once Romo's off the books and we have some cap room they can stop this practice.


It wont be long before Dak gets a ridiculous salary and we are strapped by his contract.


I've just gave up on us ever being players in FA.

This wasn't the worst FA to not be apart of.. I'd like to have signed Gillmore long term but that is just not the type of move we would make.
 

Denim Chicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
24,569
It wont be long before Dak gets a ridiculous salary and we are strapped by his contract.


I've just gave up on us ever being players in FA.

This wasn't the worst FA to not be apart of.. I'd like to have signed Gillmore long term but that is just not the type of move we would make.

Well, Martin will be first, but the point is once we have some cap space we can draft more traditional contracts and stop kicking the can.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I think he did.

Stop restructuring and just pay your bills.

Restructuring is part of the process. It gives you flexibility as to when and where you spend money. (and the ability to have money to spend when you need it) Otherwise, you are locked up in a jail with absolutely zero flexibility.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
It wont be long before Dak gets a ridiculous salary and we are strapped by his contract.


I've just gave up on us ever being players in FA.

This wasn't the worst FA to not be apart of.. I'd like to have signed Gillmore long term but that is just not the type of move we would make.

Free agency is reason #1A for causing dead money which is the only real way to get yourself in cap trouble.

A majority of the time you resign your own players. That really doesn't come into play as often. FA = Bad unless you are adding the last missing piece. Right now, our defense needs more than 1 missing piece. Spending big in FA when you need lots of piece is a recipe for disaster.
 

ChooChoo73

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
603
Agree with the article completely. It suggests the Cowboys behavior is not on their own terms and as a strategy but out of necessity because of he hamster wheel they are stuck in. I like to look at how the consistently good teams behave and they don't seem to touch the extremes of restructuring that this team does. They are almost alone in this behavior and without any consistent success to show for it. They also have a lopsided team of good offense and bad defense and can't do anything about it because of their poor cap situation. Those arguing for this style state that they focus on keeping their own but that's not really true. They focus on keeping their own "superstars" but who doesn't.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,203
Free agency is reason #1A for causing dead money which is the only real way to get yourself in cap trouble.

A majority of the time you resign your own players. That really doesn't come into play as often. FA = Bad unless you are adding the last missing piece. Right now, our defense needs more than 1 missing piece. Spending big in FA when you need lots of piece is a recipe for disaster.

No team is 1 missing piece away unless its a QB.

We however need pressure players desperately and 1 pressure player could make a huge difference for our entire team.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,010
Reaction score
76,713
I'm sorry but how does restructuring contracts hurt them? As long as they have money to re-sign their guys I don't see the problem.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
No team is 1 missing piece away unless its a QB.

We however need pressure players desperately and 1 pressure player could make a huge difference for our entire team.

Yep, pressure. Charles Haley and the 92' Cowboys.

Signing Charles Haley wouldn't help this defense win a championship.
 

LittleD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,848
Reaction score
6,086
I'm sorry but how does restructuring contracts hurt them? As long as they have money to re-sign their guys I don't see the problem.

It doesn't really if it is managed and I bet they do. Using the CAP credit card is just have leverage. As long as the cap rises 10-12mil per year
you can keep spending as long as most of the players you restructure play up to or above the money you give them. Tony leaving will certainly open up the spigot for a couple of years before Dak gets his first contract extension. Jerry always operates just at the CAP and can open the credit card
if someone they really like is available. All teams can to some extent. Stephen has a whole staff of capologists.
 
Top