The Cowboys were stars at the "Pro Bowl"

But only because he had 2 #1 receivers on the roster who had a monster year far better than Dak's. They also had a good running game for the first time in a while.

But all the credit goes to Dak........ right?
So what? That doesn’t discredit him because others played well. What is this nonsense? So Aikman sucked because he played with hall of famers? This logic is flawed.

You guys are a mess lol.
 
you know why. You basically make it seem like Dak makes THEM better. It's the other way around...they are carrying HIM.
I never said any of that. I told
You I don’t rank top 5 or 20 I’ll let you do it. You replied to the post I said it in. Now that @SteveTheCowboy replies to that same post now you’re saying i said he makes the better? :laugh: Stand on your own two feet. You only responded like this because you saw someone else do it.
 
I never said any of that. I told
You I don’t rank top 5 or 20 I’ll let you do it. You replied to the post I said it in. Now that @SteveTheCowboy replies to that same post now you’re saying i said he makes the better? :laugh: Stand on your own two feet. You only responded like this because you saw someone else do it.
Okie dokie. I'll take this response as the white flag. It's just ramble babble.
 
We've gotten the formula wrong for Dak.

He needs reliable (not superstar) receivers, an elite running game, and a top 5 defense.

CeeDee, despite the drops, is a chain mover and could fit that 'reliable' mold.

Concentrating resources into the WR group (Pickens) would be a mistake unless the plan is truly a Philly style "all-in" where we mortgage the future.
We should mortgage our future.
 
Dak did his job last year, no one here can deny that. Its impossible for a qb to be perfect on every play and dak had no margin for error. The defense was an embarrassment of all embarrassment. To sit here and bash the guy who was the reason for the #1 offense is wild. Says a lot about you.
He's a Dak Hater.
 
Ferguson, CeeDee and Pickens were featured at the game.

Dak played too. Edit: I forgot Turpin too!

Bottom line? Dak has an EMBARRASSMENT OF WEAPONS and an embarrassing $60mm/year salary.

We need guys for special teams so that the opposing team isn't starting on the 40. We need help on all 3 levels of the D.

Dak is a like a fixer-upper house...a potential money pit. The money is better invested in the land and not the house.


Just to clarify: you're using something that happened at the Pro Bowl ....the ProBwol.... to make a real football point?
 
But only because he had 2 #1 receivers on the roster who had a monster year far better than Dak's. They also had a good running game for the first time in a while.

But all the credit goes to Dak........ right?
What kind of dumb BS is this?

George Pickens by far had his best season this year in his career and for the first time under Dak. Far better than when he was playing at Pittsburgh under different QBs.

CeeDee has played mostly under Dak but also under Cooper Rush or another backup when Dak has been injured. Guess under which QB CeeDee has by far played his best football?

Do you get it? Dak definitely makes them better, hence why Dak deserves credit.
 
Ferguson, CeeDee and Pickens were featured at the game.

Dak played too. Edit: I forgot Turpin too!

Bottom line? Dak has an EMBARRASSMENT OF WEAPONS and an embarrassing $60mm/year salary.

We need guys for special teams so that the opposing team isn't starting on the 40. We need help on all 3 levels of the D.

Dak is a like a fixer-upper house...a potential money pit. The money is better invested in the land and not the house.


Its flag football. Teen girls play it too.
you-need-to-chill-out-nathan.gif
 
So what? That doesn’t discredit him because others played well. What is this nonsense? So Aikman sucked because he played with hall of famers? This logic is flawed.

You guys are a mess lol.
Did I say Dak sucked? I didn't, so stop putting words in my mouth. All I am saying is that having 2 #1 receivers on the roster is what helped Dak look better because Dak didn't do it on his own. Lamb missed 3 games this season - if #3 isn't there to take up the slack, how does #4 look in those games? He looks like he did in 2018 before Coop comes on board.

The whole offense looked better this season, including Dak, but who is always given most of the credit?
 
Did I say Dak sucked? I didn't, so stop putting words in my mouth. All I am saying is that having 2 #1 receivers on the roster is what helped Dak look better because Dak didn't do it on his own. Lamb missed 3 games this season - if #3 isn't there to take up the slack, how does #4 look in those games? He looks like he did in 2018 before Coop comes on board.

The whole offense looked better this season, including Dak, but who is always given most of the credit?
Who do you give credit to is the question?

What others do shouldn’t matter. Do you give the offense their credit. If you do then fair enough.
 
What kind of dumb BS is this?

George Pickens by far had his best season this year in his career and for the first time under Dak. Far better than when he was playing at Pittsburgh under different QBs.

CeeDee has played mostly under Dak but also under Cooper Rush or another backup when Dak has been injured. Guess under which QB CeeDee has by far played his best football?

Do you get it? Dak definitely makes them better, hence why Dak deserves credit.
So Dak doesn't need #1 receivers on the roster. This is what I'm reading. He makes everyone else better.

Did you forget 2018?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
472,165
Messages
14,392,796
Members
24,192
Latest member
Jacksonhill
Back
Top