The Difference between the Colts, Eagles, Steelers and our Cowboys.

Cas2800

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
2,025
The difference is that all those teams, as well as any good team do, they do not led up when ahead. Instead once they are in the lead they go for the throat! They like to bury teams. They kick their opponents once they are down and then keep kicking. They attack and don't let up until they are about 30 points ahead. This breeds a confidence in their offense to knowing that their coach trusts them to do the right thing. If give them pride every time they score to know that they are putting the opponents further in the hole.

On the flip side it makes the defenses job much easier knowing that they have a 10 or 14 point lead.

In a Parcells lead offense he plays for the lead. Once he had the lead he plays not to lose. When he does this several things happen.

The offense sees that he does not have confidence in their abilities and causes them to go through the motions instead of having that killer instinct in taking pride that their coach believes in them. Once in the lead, Parcells play calling becomes predicable and conservative. He runs more and takes less chances down the field because he is afraid of turnovers. Defensive coordinators who know Parcells know this therefore they concentrate more on the run knowing his conservative play calling habits and know that he tries to play the "Odds." All that is good except when you have a young defense.

When Parcells play calling becomes conservative it puts more pressure on the young defense (or any defense in that matter). The defense knows they are one play away from losing the game causes an incredible amount of pressure. They know that EVERY game they have played has been decided by only a few points. And in those games the opponents have come back in the last 2 minutes to win the game. WHY?? Well because the defense is young and playing not to lose. But the biggest factor is because the opponents are attacking after throwing caution to the wind. Our young defense has had this happen to them before and in the back of their head they are thinking just like the average fan "OH NO NOT AGAIN."

Now instead of Parcells breeding confidence in his offense that they are better they the defense therefore they will keep attacking. He has placed doubt in their minds that they are not good enough. He allows opposing teams to know that they are only one play away from being back in the game. Knowing that a fumble, interception, or one bad play will out them back on top. They never feel defeated like they would of they were 14 points down.

In turn he has put extra pressure on the defense knowing what has happened in the past. They could be playing loose and with confidence knowing that they are up 10 points but instead are playing with fear.
They are a young defense and yound defenses cannot have this pressure week after week. If so it causes a defense which has played very well all year long to start to doubt themselves.

Bill Parcells needs to ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK, until he has a comfortable lead. He needs to build confidence in his offense while taking pressure off the defense. Now im sure people will stick up for Parcells and place blame on the Bledsoe, the offensive line and everyone else. But there is a definite change in play calling once Parcells gets a lead. Why wasn't it so hard to move the ball in the first half? Because we were in attack mode. But once we got the lead Parcells figured his defense would hold. That placing a lot of pressure on the defense when the offense is not moving the ball and you are being attack on every series because the other team is behind.

People will also stick up for Parcells with a number of excuses and even blame Payton for conservative play calling. But let face it This has been Parcells way of coaching for years with the Giants and Payton is just a puppet that does what Parcells says.

I asked what is the difference between the Colts, Eagles, Steelers and the Cowboys is. The answer is that those teams attack, attack, attack while Parcells tries to sit on a lead instead of attacking.

I love Parcells but this type of coaching is killing our team. Its killing a young defense that fights like hell only to lose in the last few minutes because the opposing team is still on attack mode because they are down and only 1 play from winning the game.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Cas2800 said:
The difference is that all those teams, as well as any good team do, they do not led up when ahead. Instead once they are in the lead they go for the throat! They like to bury teams. They kick their opponents once they are down and then keep kicking. They attack and don't let up until they are about 30 points ahead. This breeds a confidence in their offense to knowing that their coach trusts them to do the right thing. If give them pride every time they score to know that they are putting the opponents further in the hole.

On the flip side it makes the defenses job much easier knowing that they have a 10 or 14 point lead.

In a Parcells lead offense he plays for the lead. Once he had the lead he plays not to lose. When he does this several things happen.

The offense sees that he does not have confidence in their abilities and causes them to go through the motions instead of having that killer instinct in taking pride that their coach believes in them. Once in the lead, Parcells play calling becomes predicable and conservative. He runs more and takes less chances down the field because he is afraid of turnovers. Defensive coordinators who know Parcells know this therefore they concentrate more on the run knowing his conservative play calling habits and know that he tries to play the "Odds." All that is good except when you have a young defense.

When Parcells play calling becomes conservative it puts more pressure on the young defense (or any defense in that matter). The defense knows they are one play away from losing the game causes an incredible amount of pressure. They know that EVERY game they have played has been decided by only a few points. And in those games the opponents have come back in the last 2 minutes to win the game. WHY?? Well because the defense is young and playing not to lose. But the biggest factor is because the opponents are attacking after throwing caution to the wind. Our young defense has had this happen to them before and in the back of their head they are thinking just like the average fan "OH NO NOT AGAIN."

Now instead of Parcells breeding confidence in his offense that they are better they the defense therefore they will keep attacking. He has placed doubt in their minds that they are not good enough. He allows opposing teams to know that they are only one play away from being back in the game. Knowing that a fumble, interception, or one bad play will out them back on top. They never feel defeated like they would of they were 14 points down.

In turn he has put extra pressure on the defense knowing what has happened in the past. They could be playing loose and with confidence knowing that they are up 10 points but instead are playing with fear.
They are a young defense and yound defenses cannot have this pressure week after week. If so it causes a defense which has played very well all year long to start to doubt themselves.

Bill Parcells needs to ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK, until he has a comfortable lead. He needs to build confidence in his offense while taking pressure off the defense. Now im sure people will stick up for Parcells and place blame on the Bledsoe, the offensive line and everyone else. But there is a definite change in play calling once Parcells gets a lead. Why wasn't it so hard to move the ball in the first half? Because we were in attack mode. But once we got the lead Parcells figured his defense would hold. That placing a lot of pressure on the defense when the offense is not moving the ball and you are being attack on every series because the other team is behind.

People will also stick up for Parcells with a number of excuses and even blame Payton for conservative play calling. But let face it This has been Parcells way of coaching for years with the Giants and Payton is just a puppet that does what Parcells says.

I asked what is the difference between the Colts, Eagles, Steelers and the Cowboys is. The answer is that those teams attack, attack, attack while Parcells tries to sit on a lead instead of attacking.

I love Parcells but this type of coaching is killing our team. Its killing a young defense that fights like hell only to lose in the last few minutes because the opposing team is still on attack mode because they are down and only 1 play from winning the game.
Yeah, the Eagles really put their foot on San Diego's throat today. :rolleyes:
 

Cas2800

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
2,025
Im talking about how those teams play game after game not on todays game. What a narrow mind.....LOL. :bang2:
 

btcutter

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
2,584
Hmmmm....they got better OL than we do? They manhandle people upfront whereas we get pushed back ending in negative plays. If we had the OL of the 90's, we would be running down peoples throats with A train and sitting 7-0.
 

NorTex

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
364
All the Steelers do is run the ball. They just do it better than we do right now.

The Eagles are lucky to be above .500.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,144
Reaction score
20,600
It's hard to ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK when your whole OL is being pushed back into your QB.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
Zman5 said:
It's hard to ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK when your whole OL is being pushed back into your QB.


A c'mon, Zman, we all know it's all on the playcalling!



It's pouring rain which makes it hard enough to pass yet people are complaining we run too much (eventhough we seemed to be getting some push today). And then when we do pass either the OL completely whiffs on their blocks or Bledsoe holds the ball too long. PLAYCALLING!!!


Then it's "We're too conservative". Yeah, a flea flicker sure is a "conservative" call, right? The reason that flea flicker didn't work is the same reason most of all our other plays didn't work... we didn't execute. Period.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,369
Reaction score
8,144
I agree Rack. Parcells' conservatism in the game came about after Bledsoe kept getting sacked by a pretty bad Dline for the Seahawks.
 

brucem78

Benched
Messages
161
Reaction score
0
bbgun said:
All those teams have vastly superior offensive lines.

I agree. We aren't going anywhere with this OL. This unit is holding our team hostage. Same problem we had during the Campo years.
 

Murph80

Member
Messages
974
Reaction score
0
The difference between those teams and the boys is YOUTH. Bottomline. The future is now for those teams. The cowboys have a strong future.
 

Phoenix-Talon

Eagles Fan Liaison
Messages
5,021
Reaction score
0
jimmy40 said:
Yeah, the Eagles really put their foot on San Diego's throat today. :rolleyes:

I know you were being faceous, but the Eagles really did put their foot on San Diego's throat! Allow me an opportunity to explain before you think I'm merely being homeristically argumentative.

I'm saying that even if the "Bolt" had won, the Eagles would have still put their foot on their throats. We practically shut down the Bolts running game and LT.
Giving credit to the caliber of offense that the Bolts have, the Eagles defense were all over them with blitz packages. Again, I'm not talking win or loss, I'm talking about which team dominated when it counted the most.

Ok, now, youu can think I'm being homeristically argumentative ...but at least now you understand the point ...or not.:rolleyes:
 
Top