The latest on George Pickens and his future

Tag and trade.
Tag and keep. The talent between him and our 3rd receiver is a chasm and we can't blow a pick on getting a legit #2.

If he screws up, merely discard him after the 1 year lease and move on .

Not sold on flournoy as a real #2
 
It depends on what you want to do. Do we want the big cap hit now? Or 3 years down the road? That's really the only difference. Might as well be now since they have no intention of signing any big name players. Tag him now, and you all but guarantee no action in free agency.
3 years down the road, sellout for the next 2 years to make the best chance of getting a SB under our belt.

other teams do it, they comeback from being bad to contending and possibly winning. you just have to time it correctly.
 
If Jerry doesn’t sign Pickens he’s an idiot
agreed, we need a high powered offense right now. Lamb , Pickens ,Flournoy and maybe even J WIlliams give us that possibility. then put everything else into a tackle and defense.
 
Why can't we just trade him for Crosby, yes we will need a receiver, I don't have much faith drafting a DE generally speaking your waiting until year 2 to see dividends. Raiders should really want a wr if they get qb at one.
There’s no way the Raiders do that
 
Seems like the best move — by tagging him you:
A) see how he reacts to it. Is he mature enough that you want to make a bigger investment in '27?
-and-
B) probably get him cheaper than you would by signing him.
-and-
C) create unnecessary drama because you’re cheap and further show that negotiating with Jerry is unpleasant

Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.
 
Interested in hearing more about this 'mood thong'. If a pair of underwear can solve the wife's mood swings, I'll be in debt to you for bringing this to my attention.
I heard the “mood thong” was what Zeke wore during his negotiations with Jerry in his private office—strictly business, obviously.
 
-and-
C) create unnecessary drama because you’re cheap and further show that negotiating with Jerry is unpleasant

Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.
That's fair of you to say.

And I'm not saying I definitely would tag him if it were my choice but I'd consider it. However, if I were in that spot, I'd like to think I'd know the player well enough to know whether or not I want him on my team long-term.
 
Tag and keep. The talent between him and our 3rd receiver is a chasm and we can't blow a pick on getting a legit #2.

If he screws up, merely discard him after the 1 year lease and move on .

Not sold on flournoy as a real #2
There is zero chance he plays under the tag.
 
3 years down the road, sellout for the next 2 years to make the best chance of getting a SB under our belt.

other teams do it, they comeback from being bad to contending and possibly winning. you just have to time it correctly.
Yes. Agreed. But that means extending Pickens. Not tagging him. People seem to think that giving a player a long term deal is some kind of risk. It is not. No risk at all. It just cost the owner more money in real dollars. But it is always better for the team whether or not the player pans out. Tagging Pickens means they are not serious about the next two years. Just worried about losing money.
 
I dont see a scenario where he isnt tagged. Only question is if the Cowboys can reach a long term agreement with him after the tag or not. I'd offer him a Tee Higgins type of deal (adjusted for yearly inflation) and not think twice about it.
He'll go off meds if he gets tagged.
 
Yes. Agreed. But that means extending Pickens. Not tagging him. People seem to think that giving a player a long term deal is some kind of risk. It is not. No risk at all. It just cost the owner more money in real dollars. But it is always better for the team whether or not the player pans out. Tagging Pickens means they are not serious about the next two years. Just worried about losing money.
Agreed. I believe we need to do it in whatever way gives us the best chance of fielding a formidable team for the next few years , until Dak ages out and we need his replacement.
 
If I were Jerry I would mortgage the farm to go all in on the next 2-3 years. Restructure everyone. Add void years to everyone. Go wild in free agency. If we don't win in the next 2-3 years we are rebuilding anyway with a new QB, so why not maximize it?
 
I wonder how his old team is making out and if they miss him? I see they are in the playoffs. Interesting.
 
The tag would require the Cowboys to devote over 9% of the 2026 salary cap to George Pickens.
WI'll probably have close to 50% of the cap tied up in Dak, cedee, and pickens next year.

And our offense will still wet the bed against any legitimate defense on the road
 
A team in the playoffs goes out of their way to get rid of.him. a team outside the playoffs is desperate to resign him. You cant make this stuff up.
 
Tag and trade.
I’d tag for sure. Then see what a deal would look like. And they know how things have been with him better than we do. I did feel like a couple of games he was somewhat disinterested
 
I’d tag for sure. Then see what a deal would look like. And they know how things have been with him better than we do. I did feel like a couple of games he was somewhat disinterested
I believe we are have a better chance of getting a top WR than a top DE in this draft.

If Jerry and Pickens Agent can't agree early, then Jerry needs to tag and explore trade options.
 
Would be dumb to sign him too a long term guaranteed contract after one season here and it being a contract year ..of course that's why Jerry will do it
GP talented, but has to stay on meds.

He was terrible in the Detroit game.

Tag him and he will be passive aggressive.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
471,567
Messages
14,349,372
Members
23,856
Latest member
jessicajohnn
Back
Top