The Official Big Fancy Who do we bring in for QB (starter or Back up) Thread *MERGED*

BotchedLobotomy

Wide Right
Messages
15,514
Reaction score
23,617
There are some really bad backup QB's in the league right now, who could possibly be out there that is worth bringing in?
 

SilverStarCowboy

The Actualist
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
1,998
Well Weeden has won as many Super Bowls as Romo, give the guys a chance.He might be a year better here.He looked younger and healthier than Romo with an arm that Romo cannot come close too.



confusion.jpg
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Not a popular pick but I'd try for sanchez. He's way better than weeden and moore. But highly doubt the eagles would be down. Lol here's another reason I'm sure I'll get stabbed. Should've signed vick!

Sanchez is good for a couple of games.
Then when you really need him... He folds.

Eagles took Demarco just to hurt us. They wouldn't let Sanchez go.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Why sign a guy that nobody else thought was any good to sign.

They don't have to sign anyone if they are comfortable with Weeden and elevating Moore from the PS to the active roster. If they want to add someone I don't see why they would waste a draft pick to trade for some scrub. There are scrubs available to sign.
 

Deep_South

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,030
Reaction score
3,653
He's a QB with NFL experience. There just aren't too many to choose from. Jason Campbell didn't play last year, but he might be worth a look. He's 33.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,203
I would take Tebow just for the potential to move the ball on the ground.

I feel like we could score 20 points a game just using a zone read offense with some playaction off of it.

Of course i'd stick with Weeden but I don't think that trying to impose our will on the ground is a bad idea.


Regardless i'd like to see a mobile guy brought in that can run.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
If Chip has shown anything it's his amazing track record with bad player decisions. Tebow was one, I'd let him settle into his commentary career.
 

lkelly

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,950
Reaction score
6,417
Philly probably looks better in the preseason for two reasons:

1. Chip Kelly strikes me as a guy who spends time game planning for preseason opponents because it feeds his ego to win.

2. Opponents likely spend very little time game planning for his offense in the preseason because they don't want to take time time away from practice meant to evaluate roster spots. They run vanilla defensive schemes against the Eagles in those games and the offense looks great.
 

garyv

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,241
Reaction score
1,747
You might consider him a scrub and I'm not a Tebow fan but hes 8-6 I read hes 8-6 as a Starter and does
bring excitement and a problem to opposing defenses. Remember your talking as backup to Weeden and the
fact this maybe a fallback option for the Eagles. I personally would fear the Eagles much more with Tebow
than Sam Bradford.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
I love Tebow as a person and a player, but he cannot run this offense.

He needs a Wildcat/Spread/Read Option type of situation.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,707
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,203
I love Tebow as a person and a player, but he cannot run this offense.

He needs a Wildcat/Spread/Read Option type of situation.

I honestly wouldn't mind adopting that if Weeden doesn't pan out.


I'd rather adopt that offense for 5 or 6 games then try to run our offense through a Christian Ponder type.

We need to find points however we can get them.
 
Top