The real reason we kept so many Receivers?

starfrombirth

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,084
Reaction score
1,419
Just a thought, but is it possible that the real reason we kept all the receivers because we have more talent their than at TE? Is it possible that BP is considering a more vertical attack? Think about it. All preseason all that we have seen doesn't show a TE attack but more of receiver lean. We have all been raving about the receivers maybe BP has seen the same thing and changed his plans with the talent he has available. Just a thought.:star:
 

Natedawg44

Active Member
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
0
Any offense where Witten isn't one of the main cogs, I can't get down with.
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
starfrombirth said:
Just a thought, but is it possible that the real reason we kept all the receivers because we have more talent their than at TE? Is it possible that BP is considering a more vertical attack? Think about it. All preseason all that we have seen doesn't show a TE attack but more of receiver lean. We have all been raving about the receivers maybe BP has seen the same thing and changed his plans with the talent he has available. Just a thought.:star:

Essentially, yes. I think this whole 'two te set' thing is blown WAY out of proportion. Even if it is our base, our base doesn't mean you'll see it 80% of the time or anything.

Frankly, we were deeper at WR than TE. Why keep a lesser TE who has less skill than your worse WR? You keep talented players and scheme them, not scheme less talented players.
 

austintodallas

Consider Yourself Sucked
Messages
2,413
Reaction score
1
Crown Royal said:
Essentially, yes. I think this whole 'two te set' thing is blown WAY out of proportion. Even if it is our base, our base doesn't mean you'll see it 80% of the time or anything.

Frankly, we were deeper at WR than TE. Why keep a lesser TE who has less skill than your worse WR? You keep talented players and scheme them, not scheme less talented players.
Very good point.
 

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,511
Reaction score
6,475
yea with all the things our recievers have shown in camp and preseason.....damn it would be hard to let them go..even 1 of em...Sam hurd..and Rector....i think will be real good back ups...and will pose a threat when we decided to go 5 wide or 4 wide..cuz they can catch n make plays

they also shown in preason when ownes,glenn, and patrick were to get hurt they could step up and be leaders....and we all already kno wat jason witten can do..hes another lethal weapon

as long as the o lie can hold thier own
 

Hiero

New Member
Messages
3,075
Reaction score
0
I think it also has to do with our top three guys being potential injuries during the year
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
They boys will be hitting teams from every direction, IMO. The TEs will get looks, the 1st thru 3rd receiver will get looks - The full back and running back will get looks..

I've watched this line closely and it's obvious that our pass blocking is far superior to our run blocking. I don't worry about the middle of that line in pass protection because I've seen how good our backs are at picking up the middle blitz, and for the most part, Bledsoe has found the open receiver when defenses have blitzed during pre-season.

So this means to me that we are going to be a pass happy team, I could be wrong.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
starfrombirth said:
Just a thought, but is it possible that the real reason we kept all the receivers because we have more talent their than at TE? Is it possible that BP is considering a more vertical attack? Think about it. All preseason all that we have seen doesn't show a TE attack but more of receiver lean. We have all been raving about the receivers maybe BP has seen the same thing and changed his plans with the talent he has available. Just a thought.:star:

Doubt it -- the 4th TE and 6th WR wouldn't be active gameday. That means you keep whoever is better, position doesn't really come into play.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
summerisfunner said:
so Clove, it's gone from 3 days to 2?
And from the Super Bowl to playoffs. I've got too many to go every 3rd day...;)
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,873
Reaction score
112,838
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
starfrombirth said:
The real reason we kept so many Receivers?
TO could act up and get cut.
Glenn could get hurt.
Crayton could get hurt.

There are my 3 big reasons.
 

cobra

Salty *******
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
Why did we keep more WRs than TEs?

Answer:

(value of Rector to the team this season x 3) + (value of Rector to the team long term) > (value of Curtis to the team this season x 3) + (value of Curtis to the team long term)

and

(value of Hurd to the team this season x 3) + (value of Hurd to the team long term) > (value of Curtis to the team this season x 3) + (value of Curtis to the team long term)

and

(value of Austin to the team this season x 3) + (value of Austin to the team long term) > (value of Curtis to the team this season x 3) + (value of Curtis to the team long term)

That's why.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Therefore, having an abundance of WRs familiar with the system and young and less injury-prone is exactly what BP has in mind.

Also, spreading the defense with 3 WR sets is going to do more to help the running game than playing 2-TE sets that cause the defense to stack in and run their run-blitz packages to break up the timing of the OL. Timing that they really dont have at this point with so many new faces.

It's harder to run-blitz if the offense is dropping into 3 and 5 step drops and throwing quickly. Run blitzes creates pressure on the secondary and LBers to cover anybody coming out of the backfield, too.

So with us keeping so many WR's..it seems to definitely be tipping BP's hand as to what we are going to be featuring at least early. I'd think that once the OL does this and the offense succeeds, and points are on the board, we will then go to a 2-TE offense and try to play T of P.

And let the defense try to mop up the other team as they hopefully play from behind and forget the ground game trying to throw the ball. Letting us rush the passer with Ellis, Ware and Co.

I'm Ok with that. Let's have about 5-6 WRs that are involved and spread the ball so even if TO, Witten and Glenn are on the field, guys like Rector, Hurd, Austin and Crayton can burn the the holes in the defense trying to cover everybody.

Why would you run first if you can play pitch and catch at will..?

We've seen the screen pass a few times this pre-season and I think that also is going to be a big weapon this year with MBIII as the 3rd down back.

Again, passing the ball for quick hits of yardage and keeping the wear and tear off the RB's so they can be effective later in the year when hopefully the defense is going to mature into a true force each Sunday seems like a very reasonable game plan.

A lot depends on keeping Bledsoe and TO staying healthy and the defense not hitting any games where they start to give up long pass plays like they did last year. No more Commander, KC and Giant collapses and we can seriously think homefield advantage in the NFC.

We'll see. But I believe BP has decided to pull out all the stops and throw the ball bigtime and try to get 10-14 point leads early in games and sit on the defense for the wins.

Very different than last year where we played to try to keep the game close going into the 4th QT and try to win. That doesn't win consistantly in today's NFL.

Wide-open offenses and multiple schemes that keeps the defense guessing is what wins.

parcellswaterboy
 

FLcowboy

When Jerry, when?
Messages
4,061
Reaction score
260
starfrombirth said:
Just a thought, but is it possible that the real reason we kept all the receivers because we have more talent their than at TE? Is it possible that BP is considering a more vertical attack? Think about it. All preseason all that we have seen doesn't show a TE attack but more of receiver lean. We have all been raving about the receivers maybe BP has seen the same thing and changed his plans with the talent he has available. Just a thought.:star:

All of that, and maybe the fact the running game went south.
 
Top