perrykemp
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,503
- Reaction score
- 9,274
Whoa, hold up.
During the past ten seasons, 2006 to 2015, the Dallas Cowboys have had more Pro Bowlers on their offensive line than any other team......by FAR.
The Cowboys have had 18 Pro Bowlers, 4 times Romo had 3 Pro Bowlers in a season, twice he had 2, twice one, and only twice has he had zero Pro Bowlers. The Cowboys have averaged 1.8 Pro Bowlers on the offensive line over the past 10 seasons. That's three times the league average per team of .6 Pro Bowlers per season. It is also the same average for Rodgers and the Packers. He also has a future Hall of Famer at TE and he's not been too shabby of a blocker either.
The team has done a good job providing both protection and quality receivers far above the league average. The Cowboys have also averaged 1.3 Pro Bowl receivers and TE's during class Romo's tenure as the starting QB. The league average is .4. The Packers have averaged .5 with Rodgers.
Quite often Romo has been forced to escape because he held on to the ball longer instead of finding an open receiver or throwing it away. That's has been a double edged sword for Tony and the Cowboys. The refusal to give up on a play has yielded big plays for and against the Cowboys.
I'm a big Tony fan but to be fair, it hasn't exactly been Romo standing alone against world. One thing that he has in common with Rodgers is he was able to sit the bench for three years behind one of the most productive QB's in history..
Good post.