The Tony Romo era is not over

Status
Not open for further replies.

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Nice try, but that doesn't wash. Rodgers' fall in the draft wasn't out of the ordinary or inexplicable. It's very explicable - 32 organizations completely whiffed on how good this guy was. Even the Packers. Because if any team had any clue, they certainly would have been willing to move to the middle of the first round to get him. The saw him throw, they saw him run, they knew everything about him...and they passed on the guy. He was not in serious consideration for the first pick. If he was, he would have been the second, or third, or fourth pick. Yes, it does happen frequently - look at the highest rated passers today - Brady, Rodgers, Romo, Wilson - heck, even guys like Roethlisberger certainly went later than they should have, given how good they are today. And there are probably even more examples of guys who were supposed to be can't miss who were total disasters. The QB position is the highest paid and most valuable...and it's the most inexact in terms of finding true quality. It's just very hard to measure some of the things that really matter when it comes to great QB play. At least, it has been up to this point. I think some of the new technologies today, including some virtual reality setups, could probably do a much better job of identifying who will truly be good at the next level, but that's for another day. And even that might not matter because virtual reality could never mirror true reality in the sense that these guys wouldn't be getting crushed by 300 lbs. linemen in virtual reality scenarios. They would know they're not in any real danger. That changes things.

If a team could see into the future and know that a QB would be as good as Rodgers but the stipulation is that they have to keep that QB as a backup for 3 yeas and he can't be the starter until year 4, then where would that player be drafted?

Would teams use the #1 overall pick on a QB that won't start until his 4th season?

I think some top 10 QBs that failed would likely have succeed if they had been able to stay on the bench and not have the pressure to be the starter until their 4th season.
 

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
Would teams use the #1 overall pick on a QB that won't start until his 4th season?

If you had a crystal ball and could see the guy was going to be a multi-time NFL MVP and a once in a decade type of talent the answer is yes, especially at the QB position.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
If you had a crystal ball and could see the guy was going to be a multi-time NFL MVP and a once in a decade type of talent the answer is yes, especially at the QB position.

That makes sense in the idea world but in reality team with a top 10 pick need to get better now and are not focuses on 4 years down the road. The owner needs to sell ticket and the GM / HC need to keep their jobs.

Some teams probably already have or think they have their QB of the future and think some non-QB 1st round pick is what they need to get to the top.

That leaves teams like the Cowboys and Patriots that would likely have the most interest in a player that won't be the true starter for a few years. The problem for the Patriots and hopefully for the Cowboys is that it would be difficult to trade up from the end of the 1st to the top of the 1st.
 

PA Cowboy Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,354
Reaction score
51,350
Except they can, and they will.

Unfortunately you're right. The FO never seems to learn from the past. We better win in the next couple of years . And then we'll probably waste Dez's best years looking for a QB. Considering that Jerry thought Bradon Weeden was a quality QB speaks volumes. I don't know if he could find a quality QB if one fell in his lap.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,440
Reaction score
212,343
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It may go on another 4 years, it might be 4 months. The Cowboys should operate from here on like Romo is about to retire. Otherwise, unless the team gets very, very lucky you're going to see some really bad football here for awhile when he's gone.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,837
Reaction score
20,694
Unfortunately you're right. The FO never seems to learn from the past. We better win in the next couple of years . And then we'll probably waste Dez's best years looking for a QB. Considering that Jerry thought Bradon Weeden was a quality QB speaks volumes. I don't know if he could find a quality QB if one fell in his lap.

No, our problem was COMPLETELY ignoring the QB AFTER Aikman retired. It was not before, but after. When we did take a QB, we chose an overrated QB project coming out of college.

We had a chance to do that with Manziel, and didn't. I'd also like some of you to point out a QB in this years draft that is a MUST grab, I'm not seeing it.
 

PA Cowboy Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,354
Reaction score
51,350
No, our problem was COMPLETELY ignoring the QB AFTER Aikman retired. It was not before, but after. When we did take a QB, we chose an overrated QB project coming out of college.

We had a chance to do that with Manziel, and didn't. I'd also like some of you to point out a QB in this years draft that is a MUST grab, I'm not seeing it.

No it was before. This team wasn't prepared for life after Aikman. The organization was under the impression that Aikman was going to go on and on even if he was in decline the last couple of years. The Carter pick was Jerry being Jerry. He wanted to prove that he was smarter than everybody else. And the scary thing is Carter was better than the other scrubs Jerry brought in to compete with him.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,837
Reaction score
20,694
No it was before. This team wasn't prepared for life after Aikman. The organization was under the impression that Aikman was going to go on and on even if he was in decline the last couple of years. The Carter pick was Jerry being Jerry. He wanted to prove that he was smarter than everybody else. And the scary thing is Carter was better than the other scrubs Jerry brought in to compete with him.

Most teams aren't prepared after they lose their franchise QB because it's hard to find a franchise QB!

You want to know how to bring in a QB and for them to have immediate success? Have a nice team built around them. I want this to be a solid TEAM when we draft a QB. We still have a team to build NOW while we have our franchise QB.

It's simply just not the time to be drafting a QB in the first or second rounds, especially in this years draft. Some of you act like an Andrew Luck is on his way out.
 

cajuncocoa

✮ ✮ ✮ ✮ ✮
Messages
4,236
Reaction score
1,638
The season is over. I won't be one of those guys that comes back and say "I told you so", but there's no way we make the playoffs. Prepare yourself.

Here's the thing: it's either over or it's not. You have a 50/50 chance of being right. I'd rather take the positive view at this point, because there's never been a Cowboys' season where we've lost less than 3 games. Yes, I realize that this team would have to win out to equal the best season a Cowboys' team has ever had, but that's not even necessary to make the playoffs. And that's all they need to do: make the playoffs. At that point, it's a new season, and if everyone is back on board and healthy, who knows?

 

cowboyblue22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
8,707
as much as we don't want it to be yes it is almost over only have maybe couple more years
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,687
Reaction score
18,036
What is it with this sudden infatuation with so many Dallas fans acting like the season is over, the draft is practically tomorrow, and that we desperately need to draft a QB with our top pick...?...

Last I checked, we still have a MVP-caliber QB, who indicated earlier this year that he wants to play for at least another 3-4 seasons beyond 2015... And it's not like Romo has shown decline, on the contrary, he has actually gotten better with age.

The Cowboys are pretty good right now, and our focus should be drafting other impact players to surround Romo with so we can win now. It's not time to worry about winning 5 years from now...

Why are so many zoners rushing to put in fork in the Tony Romo era? He's not done, not even close, but we are close to contending for a Super Bowl, and now is the time to go all-in with Romo. You can draft 200 QB's before you find another one as good as Romo, so you don't waste his best years by throwing away a 1st-round pick on a QB who's destined to ride the bench and will probably be a bust anyway.

Furthermore, Tony's not dead, he will return soon, and he will save our season. All this talk of QB will look even more silly if we're picking last in the first-round, which is exactly what Romo says will happen, just ask Tom Brady...

The season is not over, and Romo's era is about as over as John Elway's era was over in 1994...

It is called planning for the future, laddie.
Also, it is one thing for an aged and hobbled QB to want to play for 3-4 years and quite another thang to actually be able to. (And forgive me for using a preposition at the end of the sentence.)
So let us end the snark about planning for the future. Yeth, play Romo until the wheels come off. But by that time, it will be too late to start looking for a QB of the future. Then come 5-8 years of being in the wilderness like the last years of the Landry regime.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,687
Reaction score
18,036
It was never over.

Yeah! It's not over until we say it's over!

th
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top