See I knew you liked movies like Animal House !!!
Classics? Yeth.
Little, brain-cell robbing movies featuring 30-year-old mens playing teens, nein!
Classics? Yeth.
Little, brain-cell robbing movies featuring 30-year-old mens playing teens, nein!
I agree it's not over yet. Dallas has next year and the year after that to get it done with tony. He'll play at least 2 more years. Barring serious injury of course. But they do need to find a young qb. I can't see using a 1,2,3 round pick this offseason or next though. It's win now mode.
It's lose now mode without Romo. You seem to have written off the season.
Ya I gave up after the Saints game with this season but dallas still has 2 more seasons to get a sb win. I'll still root for them like always but it's just not the same this season it's been a bummer.
I agree, but injuries happen, it's not like he's Sam Bradford...
That's how you got so smart !!!
I can almost guarantee Tony Romo will get hurt again ... THIS YEAR.
I bet you got right off here and went to watch that movie again !!!!
Because without beating the saints, what does the season matter anyway? It was one freakin' game. So we won't win as many as last season, that doesn't mean the season is lost.
Without a huge turn of events I don't see this team getting to at least 9 wins. Not impossible but also highly unlikely. There's a ton of issues with the organization and I'm not going to be all negative like I can be. There's enough of that already on here. Just saying that I've personally given up hope on this year. It might turn around it might not. I've been emotionless since the Atlanta game and have hardly watched any football since. I'd be just as happy as the next fan if this season turned around.
Okay but I think your giving up hope is a few games premature. There is the possibility I'll be right there with you by the end of the month.
I just haven't seen anything to keep me having hope this season. That's why I'm not saying anything to the people who still have hope. Everybodies got their own way to look at things.
Again, Romo plans on playing for more than a couple of years beyond this season, at least three... We are already a pretty good team, but it would really help our chances of winning a Super Bowl if we use our top draft picks on a stud DT or FS that could come in and be an instant upgrade... Drafting a QB in the first-round and having him sitting on the bench for a minimum of 3 seasons is not going to help us win the Super Bowl with Tony Romo as our QB...
And again, it's very unlikely that you'll draft the next Aaron Rodgers, even if you had the #1 pick... It's much more likely that we'd do what Cleveland did and spend a first-rounder on the next Brandon Weeden...
But there's another scenario that's just as bad, you could spend a high pick on a QB, like Detroit did in 2009 when they took Mathew Stafford #1 overall, and he could show all the promise and potential that Stafford has at times... You know he's a starting-caliber QB, and sometimes he looks really good, but in the end, he's just not quite good enough... He was just good enough to give you just enough hope that your team ended wasting 6+ seasons hoping he'd take that next step but instead he regresses...
Which is worse, Cleveland drafting Weeden and knowing within 2 seasons to cut bait, or being Detroit drafting Stafford, who plays just good enough to string you along for 6+ seasons? I don't like either option, which is why I don't think it's time to start throwing high draft picks at a problem we don't yet have...
Maybe you are right.... why am I doing this?