The truth about the 2006 Seatle Playoff Game

[Kwmike22]

Everyone remembers Romo droping the ball at the end. The the truth is Roy Williams was owned by Jeremy Stevens that game. Statistics do not lie. Jeremy Stevens had statisticly the best game of his career in the 2006 playoff game. Seatle game plan was to match Jeremy against Roy in passing situations and it worked. Jeremy had 77 yards and 2 touchdowns.

 

[superpunk]

http://img214.*************/img214/1382/facepalm2ly3.jpg

 

[CATCH17]

I vote close the thread.

 

[tomson75]

So this is the fourth thread you've started like this. Sweet.

Take a hike.

 

[theebs]

!!!!!!!!!



I think someone is now chumpitized.

 

[LeonDixson]

We lost that game because we ran plays that kept their linebackers in the play, which was one of their strengths, instead of attacking their decimated secondary. We were simply out-coached. Stupid, stubborn Bill Parcells lost that game for us.

 

[bbgun]

If you're going to misspell a word, make sure you don't use the bold function and draw attention to it.

 

[superpunk]

If you're going to misspell a word, make sure you don't use the bold function and draw attention to it.

You must not be familiar with fonix.

 

[CATCH17]

We lost that game because we ran plays that kept their linebackers in the play, which was one of their strengths, instead of attacking their decimated secondary. We were simply out-coached. Stupid, stubborn Bill Parcells lost that game for us.

Dont feed the troll.

 

[superpunk]

Dont feed the troll.

Especially not with garbage like that.

 

[Mansta54]

Especially not with garbage like that.

That wasn't garbage, that was fact.. We didn't attack their secondary nearly enough.. It's true!!

 

[Kwmike22]

I posted a tread to get peoples opinion about this. There is no reason to critized me personaly, because of my opinion. There is no reason to call me a troll or to ask to close the tread. I make a valid point.

 

[superpunk]

That wasn't garbage, that was fact.. We didn't attack their secondary nearly enough.. It's true!!

No. It was garbage.

I posted a tread to get peoples opinion about this. There is no reason to critized me personaly, because of my opinion. There is no reason to call me a troll or to ask to close the tread. I make a valid point.

What year is this?

 

[Mansta54]

I posted a tread to get peoples opinion about this. There is no reason to critized me personaly, because of my opinion. There is no reason to call me a troll or to ask to close the tread. I make a valid point.

:horse:

 

[Mansta54]

No. It was garbage.

Their secondary was virtually fresh off the street and injured, naw, we didn't attack them enough IMO at all.

 

[tomson75]

I posted a tread to get peoples opinion about this. There is no reason to critized me personaly, because of my opinion. There is no reason to call me a troll or to ask to close the tread. I make a valid point.

Of your 5 posts thus far, four of them have been threads you've started about Williams.

This thread, which you were kind enough to post twice, wasn't asking for peoples opinions either.

This thread clearly illustrates to this forum what your intentions are here.

Why should we think this gem would be any different?

You are trolling, and should be dealt with accordingly.

 

[CosmicCowboy]

Well, all that is in the 'past'...there is a new season coming up ease up. :starspin

 

[Sarge]

The ultimate reason we lost that game was terrible coaching and play-calling. When you have the opposing teams' secondary demolished with injuries and we continuosly run the ball - there is a fundamental problem there - a problem that I am VERY comfortable that we have fixed via Garrett.

 

[Mansta54]

The ultimate reason we lost that game was terrible coaching and play-calling. When you have the opposing teams' secondary demolished with injuries and we continuosly run the ball - there is a fundamental problem there - a problem that I am VERY comfortable that we have fixed via Garrett.

 

[DallasEast]

Of your 5 posts thus far, four of them have been threads you've started about Williams.

This thread, which you were kind enough to post twice, wasn't asking for peoples opinions either.

This thread clearly illustrates to this forum what your intentions are here.

Why should we think this gem would be any different?

You are trolling, and should be dealt with accordingly.

I should've known better than to doubt you, but I did a search of his posting history anyway. wow.