Hostile;2907710 said:Looks innocent enough, but without pads it probably stung pretty good.
DandyDon1722;2907736 said:For as much as people were beating Scandrick up before we knew what was wrong with Roy, I like his approach to the game, pads or no pads.
Maybe we're not as "soft" as we have been, mentally or physically.
SLATEmosphere;2907738 said:There's a time and a place. Doing it without pads against our #1 is not one of them.
Everlastingxxx;2907745 said:Yea, just give up an easy slant TD in front of 26 thousand. If he had that type of mindset he would be Anthony Henry.
Everlastingxxx;2907745 said:Yea, just give up an easy slant TD in front of 26 thousand. If he had that type of mindset he would be Anthony Henry.
SLATEmosphere;2907738 said:There's a time and a place. Doing it without pads against our #1 is not one of them.
DandyDon1722;2907752 said:That's where I think you're wrong Slate and you were one of the guys beating him up. He didn't line up on the play thinking that "that's the number one" across from me, his instincts told him to make a play the ball in a practice situation and he did.
Maybe one out of 50 times Roy gets hurt on that play. I know its no pads but personally, I'd rather have him be aggressive than passive. I have no problems with the play.
SLATEmosphere;2907738 said:There's a time and a place. Doing it without pads against our #1 is not one of them.
DandyDon1722;2907736 said:For as much as people were beating Scandrick up before we knew what was wrong with Roy, I like his approach to the game, pads or no pads.
Maybe we're not as "soft" as we have been, mentally or physically.