DWelch1775 said:Hey i've been a playstation fan since it came out, but after playing the 360 for awhile, i know playstation is in alot of trouble. The 360 is awesome, it like a damn computer.
CowboyShuy said:PS3 is not in trouble, XBOX 360 is!! just wait and see what the PS3 has, why do you think PS3 waited for all this time? to make something worst than XBOX or something better? common sense, if i were you i will wait for PS3 100 bucs more but you dont have to pay $100 each year to play online like XBOX
TheKey said:does anyone own one and can you tell me if it would be worth my 300 bucks.
Biggest difference IMO is that 360 has built in Memory and the PS3 won't I hate buying memory cards....CowboyShuy said:PS3 is not in trouble, XBOX 360 is!! just wait and see what the PS3 has, why do you think PS3 waited for all this time? to make something worst than XBOX or something better? common sense, if i were you i will wait for PS3 100 bucs more but you dont have to pay $100 each year to play online like XBOX
jksmith269 said:Biggest difference IMO is that 360 has built in Memory and the PS3 won't I hate buying memory cards....
peplaw06 said:The disadvantage PS3 is gonna be at due to being a year behind 360 is HUGE. The first generation games for the 360 were crap for the most part. There have been some good games, but not really at launch. And there still isn't a console headliner, like Halo... but Halo 3 will be coming (retread, but still a headliner). Not to mention Gears of War is coming this fall. That will be the new Halo.
Launch games are consistently bad. So when PS3 does come out... it's going to go through the same type of stuff. You may not see great PS3 games until 18 months after 360's launch. By then 360 will be putting out great game after great game. The PS3 may never catch up.
I have a lot of concerns about the PS3. There's still not a definite launch date. Latest I've heard is October or November, but they've been delaying it already. Oh and good luck getting one at launch. I've also heard rumors that it could cost up to $900
http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/23/commentary/game_over/column_gaming/
Given all these issues, I'm happy with my $400 360 that I've had for 7 months thank you.
TheKey said:does anyone own one and can you tell me if it would be worth my 300 bucks.
TruBlueCowboy said:I tell ya right now, if you don't own an HDTV, it's not worth it all. Same types of games as the original Xbox, only HDTV graphics now. Same with PS3, although I'd imagine that system will be a huge improvement over the PS2 since that was probably an outdated system to begin with.
For all the folks telling you to save your money for a PS3, it's about $200 more, and the main reason to buy it is for the cheap blu-ray player. So if you're really into watching HD resolution movies, and don't intend on buying one of the thousand dollar blu-ray players that will probably be on the market near Xmas, get a PS3.
Otherwise, there's no difference between the 360 and PS3. Both have similar specs, both have similar controllers and online options, and both will have similar games with PS3 having more of a Japanese influence and 360 having more of an American influence from software companies.
HeavyHitta31 said:Save your money for the PS3. It is faster, has a better graphics engine, and it's online play is second to none. The controller also isnt impossible to master like the damn tank Microsoft puts out.
CowboyShuy said:It wont cost $900, and why do you think PS3 is waiting all this time? cause they are learning from XBOX 360 mistakes, and PS3 will have hardrive also, PS3 is $100 more but you dont have to pay $100 each year for playing online, if you want to check PS3 features watch this!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mq5job_en0
PS2 > XBOX
PS3 > XBOX 360
release date is novemeber, $500 for the better PS3 that has a lot of space so you can save photos, DVD´s, music. But if you are only buying PS3 to play and save games buy the $400 PS3.
LOL! So Untrue. Sony, the company that always over-promises and underdelivers. Have fun spending that $600 that will be no better than the 360.HeavyHitta31 said:Save your money for the PS3. It is faster, has a better graphics engine, and it's online play is second to none. The controller also isnt impossible to master like the damn tank Microsoft puts out.
DING DING DING! We have a winner.Otherwise, there's no difference between the 360 and PS3. Both have similar specs, both have similar controllers and online options, and both will have similar games with PS3 having more of a Japanese influence and 360 having more of an American influence from software companies.
The number of "console exclusives" will be minimal in this next generations of games. Developers are starting to see that they lose out ($$$$$) by keeping a game exclusive to one console.the trick is - see which ones have "propriatary games" - or games you can't get on any other system and compare games also.
I only pay $50 for xbox live for online play and it's well worth it.CowboyShuy said:PS3 is not in trouble, XBOX 360 is!! just wait and see what the PS3 has, why do you think PS3 waited for all this time? to make something worst than XBOX or something better? common sense, if i were you i will wait for PS3 100 bucs more but you dont have to pay $100 each year to play online like XBOX
bobtheflob said:I'm waiting for the wii myself. I'm on too much of a budget for the others.