Thoughts From a Pats Fan

Pats Fan

Benched
Messages
508
Reaction score
0
Of course regarding Bledsoe. I am a former sufferer of Bledsoe. When Brady came in, my football life suddenly got better.

My thoughts. One thing I know is Bledsoe would never, ever take you to the promised land. Never. Of that I am sure. It is not just that he is immobile, it is also the case that he does not stand up to pressure, takes too long to get rid of the ball, and the biggest problem, he cannot -- or look for a secondary receiver - oh, and did I mention he cannot read defenses. You are well rid of him if he is gone for good. We threw him out the door, Buffalo threw him out the door, and if the rumor is true, he is letting himself out the door this time. No loss, trust me as a New England fan. And I didn't watch him on TV, I had to sit in the stands and watch him. On again, off again Bledsoe. Oh, except if it counts, then it is always OFF again.

Now many people will continue to support him in Dallas. That was the case in New England and Buffalo. No offense to anyone, but do those people know football??? Don't worry about it. I never looked back.

As far as Romo, he is mobile. The tight end no longer has to be just a blocker (big plus). The problem is that he needs some on field experience. Looks like he can read a defense, has a pretty good arm, and adds some leadership. What I saw last night was a guy trying to force the ball into the secondary. Simply stated bad decision making. That being said Bledsoe has the same problem and how darn long has he been playing??? Give Romo a shot. If he continues to start (most likely will), and is making the same dumb mistakes by the end of the year, time to look to the draft for a QB. Still doesn't change the fact that Bledsoe is a bum. As they say, move on already.

As far as Parcells, I give him a lot of credit for making that move last night. He just should have done it at the beginning of the year. As you know, we in New England had Parcells as a coach and he brings a lot of positives. On the negative side, he likes to have players around him that he knows. Rolling the dice is something very hard for him to do. Give the guy credit for making this move (although I am sure Jones put a little pressure on). But I was also glad when Parcells moved on. Belichick puts the best players on the field. Bledsoe was benched in his prime. I am not sure Parcells would have done that.

Well, just my two cents. Been there, done that. But I would give this new kid a shot. Practice and a real game are two different worlds. He has the physical skills, now is the development of the mental skills. Bledsoe just never seemed to get that part!!!
 

DBoys

New Member
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
0
Pats Fan;1113690 said:
Of course regarding Bledsoe. I am a former sufferer of Bledsoe. When Brady came in, my football life suddenly got better.

My thoughts. One thing I know is Bledsoe would never, ever take you to the promised land. Never. Of that I am sure. It is not just that he is immobile, it is also the case that he does not stand up to pressure, takes too long to get rid of the ball, and the biggest problem, he cannot -- or look for a secondary receiver - oh, and did I mention he cannot read defenses. You are well rid of him if he is gone for good. We threw him out the door, Buffalo threw him out the door, and if the rumor is true, he is letting himself out the door this time. No loss, trust me as a New England fan. And I didn't watch him on TV, I had to sit in the stands and watch him. On again, off again Bledsoe. Oh, except if it counts, then it is always OFF again.

Now many people will continue to support him in Dallas. That was the case in New England and Buffalo. No offense to anyone, but do those people know football??? Don't worry about it. I never looked back.

As far as Romo, he is mobile. The tight end no longer has to be just a blocker (big plus). The problem is that he needs some on field experience. Looks like he can read a defense, has a pretty good arm, and adds some leadership. What I saw last night was a guy trying to force the ball into the secondary. Simply stated bad decision making. That being said Bledsoe has the same problem and how darn long has he been playing??? Give Romo a shot. If he continues to start (most likely will), and is making the same dumb mistakes by the end of the year, time to look to the draft for a QB. Still doesn't change the fact that Bledsoe is a bum. As they say, move on already.

As far as Parcells, I give him a lot of credit for making that move last night. He just should have done it at the beginning of the year. As you know, we in New England had Parcells as a coach and he brings a lot of positives. On the negative side, he likes to have players around him that he knows. Rolling the dice is something very hard for him to do. Give the guy credit for making this move (although I am sure Jones put a little pressure on). But I was also glad when Parcells moved on. Belichick puts the best players on the field. Bledsoe was benched in his prime. I am not sure Parcells would have done that.

Well, just my two cents. Been there, done that. But I would give this new kid a shot. Practice and a real game are two different worlds. He has the physical skills, now is the development of the mental skills. Bledsoe just never seemed to get that part!!!

Thanks for the insight bro!
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
Thanks for the objective outlook without bashing the Cowboys, I'm glad to have you on Cowboyszone, a refreshing viewpoint.
 

mr.jameswoods

Active Member
Messages
3,678
Reaction score
4
Bledsoe wasn't benched. He was injured and his backup played amazing and won the Superbowl. Bellichik didn't really make an amazing decision regarding that.

And what the heck are you talking about Bledsoe not being able to throw to a second receiver. In New England, he spread the ball among 5 or 6 receivers including Ben Coates. Bledsoe has always been great about distributing the ball.

But I agree with your other points. He holds onto the ball too long and he still stares down receivers which leads to his throws getting intercepted.
 

jesusphreak

New Member
Messages
664
Reaction score
0
Bledsoe has always been great about distributing the ball.

Even if he has been great about it in the past, he hasn't been great this year about it. Witten and Crayton hardly ever got any passes their way. TO seemed like an afterthought with Bledsoe, too.
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
4,961
Pats Fan;1113690 said:
Of course regarding Bledsoe. I am a former sufferer of Bledsoe. When Brady came in, my football life suddenly got better.

My thoughts. One thing I know is Bledsoe would never, ever take you to the promised land. Never. Of that I am sure. It is not just that he is immobile, it is also the case that he does not stand up to pressure, takes too long to get rid of the ball, and the biggest problem, he cannot -- or look for a secondary receiver - oh, and did I mention he cannot read defenses. You are well rid of him if he is gone for good. We threw him out the door, Buffalo threw him out the door, and if the rumor is true, he is letting himself out the door this time. No loss, trust me as a New England fan. And I didn't watch him on TV, I had to sit in the stands and watch him. On again, off again Bledsoe. Oh, except if it counts, then it is always OFF again.

Now many people will continue to support him in Dallas. That was the case in New England and Buffalo. No offense to anyone, but do those people know football??? Don't worry about it. I never looked back.

As far as Romo, he is mobile. The tight end no longer has to be just a blocker (big plus). The problem is that he needs some on field experience. Looks like he can read a defense, has a pretty good arm, and adds some leadership. What I saw last night was a guy trying to force the ball into the secondary. Simply stated bad decision making. That being said Bledsoe has the same problem and how darn long has he been playing??? Give Romo a shot. If he continues to start (most likely will), and is making the same dumb mistakes by the end of the year, time to look to the draft for a QB. Still doesn't change the fact that Bledsoe is a bum. As they say, move on already.

As far as Parcells, I give him a lot of credit for making that move last night. He just should have done it at the beginning of the year. As you know, we in New England had Parcells as a coach and he brings a lot of positives. On the negative side, he likes to have players around him that he knows. Rolling the dice is something very hard for him to do. Give the guy credit for making this move (although I am sure Jones put a little pressure on). But I was also glad when Parcells moved on. Belichick puts the best players on the field. Bledsoe was benched in his prime. I am not sure Parcells would have done that.

Well, just my two cents. Been there, done that. But I would give this new kid a shot. Practice and a real game are two different worlds. He has the physical skills, now is the development of the mental skills. Bledsoe just never seemed to get that part!!!

what do you mean Bledsoe was benched in his prime?? i thought he got hurt, and Brady took over from there, and the Pats never looked back.
 

Everlastingxxx

All Star
Messages
7,209
Reaction score
188
Thanks, reading that makes me feel better. I am excited to see what the future holds with Romo or any other quarterbacks. Tired of the future being held hostage by Bledsoe.
 

DallasCowboysRule!

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,094
Reaction score
991
Pats Fan;1113690 said:
Of course regarding Bledsoe. I am a former sufferer of Bledsoe. When Brady came in, my football life suddenly got better.

My thoughts. One thing I know is Bledsoe would never, ever take you to the promised land. Never. Of that I am sure. It is not just that he is immobile, it is also the case that he does not stand up to pressure, takes too long to get rid of the ball, and the biggest problem, he cannot -- or look for a secondary receiver - oh, and did I mention he cannot read defenses. You are well rid of him if he is gone for good. We threw him out the door, Buffalo threw him out the door, and if the rumor is true, he is letting himself out the door this time. No loss, trust me as a New England fan. And I didn't watch him on TV, I had to sit in the stands and watch him. On again, off again Bledsoe. Oh, except if it counts, then it is always OFF again.

Now many people will continue to support him in Dallas. That was the case in New England and Buffalo. No offense to anyone, but do those people know football??? Don't worry about it. I never looked back.

As far as Romo, he is mobile. The tight end no longer has to be just a blocker (big plus). The problem is that he needs some on field experience. Looks like he can read a defense, has a pretty good arm, and adds some leadership. What I saw last night was a guy trying to force the ball into the secondary. Simply stated bad decision making. That being said Bledsoe has the same problem and how darn long has he been playing??? Give Romo a shot. If he continues to start (most likely will), and is making the same dumb mistakes by the end of the year, time to look to the draft for a QB. Still doesn't change the fact that Bledsoe is a bum. As they say, move on already.

As far as Parcells, I give him a lot of credit for making that move last night. He just should have done it at the beginning of the year. As you know, we in New England had Parcells as a coach and he brings a lot of positives. On the negative side, he likes to have players around him that he knows. Rolling the dice is something very hard for him to do. Give the guy credit for making this move (although I am sure Jones put a little pressure on). But I was also glad when Parcells moved on. Belichick puts the best players on the field. Bledsoe was benched in his prime. I am not sure Parcells would have done that.

Well, just my two cents. Been there, done that. But I would give this new kid a shot. Practice and a real game are two different worlds. He has the physical skills, now is the development of the mental skills. Bledsoe just never seemed to get that part!!!

Great post. I think I agree with everything you said.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
I actually believe that Parcells has long favored Romo, and its been Jerry who has been pressuring him to stick with Bledsoe.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
mr.jameswoods;1113709 said:
Bledsoe wasn't benched. He was injured and his backup played amazing and won the Superbowl. Bellichik didn't really make an amazing decision regarding that.

And what the heck are you talking about Bledsoe not being able to throw to a second receiver. In New England, he spread the ball among 5 or 6 receivers including Ben Coates. Bledsoe has always been great about distributing the ball.

But I agree with your other points. He holds onto the ball too long and he still stares down receivers which leads to his throws getting intercepted.


Then why did it take Romo in the game for us to have a rare Jason Witten sighting?
 

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
My response to your take on Belichik and Parcells is this...

Belichik had an easy decision to stay with Brady in 2001 because Brady played so well that year when Bledsoe was hurt and it was very easy to see that even though he was a young QB he made much quicker and better decisions than Bledsoe. That team took off with him after going 5-11 the year before and 0-2 that year with Bledsoe. Bledsoe's injury was a gift to Belichik.

The bottom line is this..Brady makes Bill Belichik this era's Lombardi.

If you disagree, go pull Belichik's HC record pre-Brady (and it's lengthy enough to be a fair indicator) and bring that stat in here and let's discuss. That is not a knock on Belichik. He's a great defensive coach. But Brady is the reason he is mentioned in the same breath as Lombardi.

I totally agree with your take on Romo. I think he can be a good player if he limits his impulses and simply plays within the game, much like Brady did in 2001.
 

dmq

If I'm so pretty, why am I available?
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
941
It was so great to see our TEs catching passes again. I for one really give Parcells a bunch of credit for this move. He convinced Bledsoe to come here and he convinced JJ he could still play. He admitted on national tv after the half that he was wrong. Parcells will coach the bad decisions out of Romo. He has been grooming him. Parcells even says many kind things about Romo. How many former QBs reaped praise from Parcells? I trust that he sees something in this guy, Heck I saw it. He seems very charismatic and brings new energy to this team. I for one really want to see more of him. I have been waiting for over a year now.
 

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
InmanRoshi;1113728 said:
I actually believe that Parcells has long favored Romo, and its been Jerry who has been pressuring him to stick with Bledsoe.

I don't necessarily disagree, but I mentioned last night that I spoke to a friend of mine last night before the game who has a cousin that played College ball at Vanderbilt under Parcells and David Lee. My friend said Lee was frustrated because he thought Romo should have been playing for a while, but that Bill had such a loyalty to Bledsoe it was very difficult for him to make the switch.

I think Parcells demeanor last night showed what a gut-wrenching thing it was for him to bench a "Parcells Guy" on Monday Night Football in front of the whole nation. Parcells knew that had to be terribly humiliating for Bledsoe.
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
Good post......Bledsoe is tough, but he just cannot move......I thought he should of helped Romo a little last night. Offer some advice etc....
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,956
Reaction score
8,174
InmanRoshi;1113728 said:
I actually believe that Parcells has long favored Romo, and its been Jerry who has been pressuring him to stick with Bledsoe.

Interesting take. Hard to believe, though.

I think BP's considering BP his friend as well as hand picked 1st round selection had something to do with giving him more opportunities than were really necessary, until he finally said enough is enough.

BTW, I was waiting for Pats Fan to post and say the same things about Bledsoe that he has always said.
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
All we can hope for is that Romo is anywhere close to as good as Brady.
 

ddh33

Active Member
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
2
I think Drew has been Jerry's guy too, actually. Oh, there's no doubt in my mind that Bill loves Drew. I think he wishes him all the best, but I think that deep down Bill knows that Drew can't help him get what he wants.

Jerry, on the other hand, has a guy with pedigree. He's got a mature guy who is going to say the right things. He's a warrior. He's a little higher profile. Plus, I think Jerry genuinely likes Drew so much that he wants him to succeed.

In the end, I still think it's best to go with Romo.
 

bysbox1

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,381
Reaction score
341
CowboyChris;1113715 said:
what do you mean Bledsoe was benched in his prime?? i thought he got hurt, and Brady took over from there, and the Pats never looked back.

You are right. Bledsoe got hurt.

But when he was healthy again, New England never looked back. If I remember correctly he came back ready to play at the end of the year, and they went with Brady instead.

The rest is history.
 

Ganja

Member
Messages
195
Reaction score
6
mr.jameswoods;1113709 said:
Bledsoe wasn't benched. He was injured and his backup played amazing and won the Superbowl. Bellichik didn't really make an amazing decision regarding that.

:hammer:
 
Top